Advanced Search Results
The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Achal Singh
Supreme Court of India
Aug-21-2018
Land Acquisition
Dinesh Chandra Sangma v. State of Assam, (1977) 4 SCC441 where the Court was considering the effect of the (Assam) Fundamental Rule 56(c) which confers right on the Government servant to voluntary retire. Rule 56(c) of the (Assam) … voluntarily to retire under this rule the appointing authority may allow him, for the purposes of pension and gratuity, if any, the benefit of additional service of five years or of such period as he would have … Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules (hereinafter referred to as the “Fundamental Rules”) as amended, an employee has unfettered right to seek voluntary retirement by serving a … months is given, the doctor is deemed to have retired and any action of attempting to reject the notice of voluntary retirement after the said … and the Explanation becomes part of the main section. There is no dispute with the aforesaid proposition. … INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.8421 Of 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.12601 of 2018)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJyothi Daniel Vs. Union of India
Kerala
Jan-28-2015
Education
the Border Security Force. Petitioners are the legal heirs of Sri.Daniel. As per the rules relating to retirement gratuity and family pension, the legal heirs of a missing person is also entitled for such benefits. Accordingly, the … ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of January 2015 JUDGMENT Petitioners have approached this Court seeking the … NALKATA, TRIPURA (NORTH)- 799 263.3. THE DEPUTY COMMANDANT (ADJUTANT), HEAD QUARTERS22BATTALION, BORDER SECURITY FORCES, ALAMGANJ P.O., DHUBRI DISTRICT, ASSAM-783 301.4. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER (PN-III), DIRECTORATE GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE, PUSHPA BHAWAN MADANGIR, NEW DELHI-110 062.5. THE ACCOUNTS … w.e.f. 1-1-1986 in terms of O.M.No.2/1/87-PIC I, dated 16-4-1987 (not printed) as amended from time to time.4. In the case of missing pensioners, the family … presumed to be dead in terms of Section 108 of the Evidence Act 1872. W.P.C.No.26734/2014 3 3. Though the petitioners had filed a civil suit
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›