Advanced Search Results

M/S.Josco Fashion Jewellers vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

collect land Tribal Areas in the revenue and to impose States of Assam, taxes in the Tribal Areas of Meghalaya, Tripura, a few States.and Mizoram8. … their relevance beyond 30.06.2017.152. In Somaiya Organics (India) Ltd. and Ors. vs. Stateof UP[53], the case concerns U.P. Excise Act, 1910. The question to be considered was this: the vend fee, though levied under an appropriate state enactment, … 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 21ST POUSHA, 1940 WP(C).No. 11335 of 2018 PETITIONER: M/S SHEEN GOLDEN JEWELS (INDIA) PVT LTD XXI/1016(2), COLLEGE ROAD, PATHANAMTHITTA, … powers on Parliament. Now this provision is subject to Article 246A of the Constitution. Article 249, amended through Section 4 of the Act, now stands changed: if Rajya Sabha approves the resolution with 2/3rd majority, Parliament will have

Farhan Shaikh vs.state (National Investigation Agency)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Patel Brothers v. State of Assam and Ors., (2017) 2 SCC350 This decision arose in the context of the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The question which fell for consideration before the Supreme Court was whether Section … be invoked in respect of an application made to the High Court under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act (unamended). CRL.A. 871/2018 Page 37 of 49 (iv) Hukum Narain Yadav (supra) -a decision dealing with the issue … - both movable and immovable, belonging to such person, stood attached under Sub Section (3) of Section 3. Section 4(2) of the Act permitted any person aggrieved by notification issued under Section 3(2) to file an objection within

The State Of Telangana Vs. M/s Tirumala Constructions

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

8 (g) special provision with respect to the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Jammu and Kashmir, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura, Himachal Pradesh and … i.e. the State and the Union was untrammeled. Learned counsel also pointed to amendments made to the Central Excise Act, much in the same terms as in the case of the Telangana and Gujarat amendments which enlarged the … of this court. The revision notice was quashed42 by the High Court.111. By virtue of the VAT (Amendment) Act, 2018, section 84A was added in the VAT Act to be operative retrospectively with effect from April 1, 2006, inter … of amendment or repeal is subject to limitations under Section 19 .... 40 C. Validity of Telangana Act tested from the touch stone of its

Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)69TTJ(Mumbai)882

State of Haryana & Ors. v. Jageram & Ors. AIR 1980 SC 2018, the provisions of Punjab Excise Act came up for consideration. In this … on. In this connection, he strongly relied on the following judgments :(1) Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd. v. CIT : [1955]27ITR34(SC) .(2) Bombay Steam Navigation … State of Rajasthan AIR 1975 SC 2000, a similar question arose for consideration in connection with the Rajasthan Excise Act. It was held that the State has the exclusive right to manufacture and sell liquor and to sell … the contentions of the assessee. He noticed that the DOT had issued a licence to the assessee under section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 on 27-3-1986 and that the licence was 'subject to the payment of

Infrastructure Leasing And Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Hdfc Bank Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

basis of the pleadings set up by the party who seeks to introduce the document in question.” In Assam Small Scale Ind. Dev. Corp. Ltd. & Ors. v. J.D. Pharmaceuticals & Anr9 the court stated as follows: … This principle of substance, over the form, was followed in Super Poly Fabriks Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Punjab11.27. That one document is styled or described in a certain manner, or that it uses a certain … Bank. Along with MFA, an “Assignment 1 Under Section 432, the Companies Act, 2013 2 Dated 13.5.2022 in IA21962020 [in CoAp. (AT) No.346/2018]. 2 Agreement” … REPORTABLE2023INSC929IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4708 OF2022INFRASTRUCTURE LEASING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS HDFC BANK LTD. &

The Deputy Commissioner And Vs. M/S S v Global Mill Limited

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

recourse to Article 148 of the Constitution.50. Patel Brothers vs. State of Assam, [(2017) 2 SCC350 (Patel Brothers) considered Sections 81 and 84 of the … has power to condone the delay in presentation of the reference under Section 35- H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The said provision prescribes a period within 180 days of the date upon which the Commissioner of … Ahmmed), the controversy revolved on the question whether an appeal under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2018 (NIA Act) could be validly filed before the High Court after the expiry of ninety days from the … properties (both movable and immovable) belonging to such person, stood attached under Sub Section (3) of Section 3. Section 4(2) of the Act permits any person aggrieved by a notification issued under Section 3(2) to file an objection

M/S Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Article 301 as propounded in Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Assam, AIR1961SC232and the working test enunciated in Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. Vs. State … of Central Excise and another, (2016) 3 SCC643 where question of levying interest under the provisions of Central Excise Act, 1944 under Rule 96- ZO, 96-ZP and 96-ZQ of Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held question of jurisdiction … JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3257-3268 OF2019(arising out of SLP (C) Nos.31748-31759 of 2018) INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ...APPELLANT Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS … submission, we need to first notice the provisions of Act, 2007 which are relevant for the present controversy. Section 4 of the Act provides for levy of tax. Section 4(1) provides that for the purpose of development of

Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

state legislature lacked authority in law to regulate the 216 State of Assam v. Om Prakash Mehta, (1973) 1 SCC584[12].; 217 (1981) 2 SCC205[6]. 218 … Income Tax Act 1961 on the payment of bottling fees made to the State Government under the Rajasthan Excise Act 1950. Section 43-B(a) allowed a deduction in respect of any sum payable by the assessee by way of … With Civil Appeal No.7937 of 2019 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.512 of 2018 With Civil Appeal No.7938 of 2019 With Civil Appeal No.7936 of 2019 … from the destruction which is caused by rapacious and unregulated mining.” The Court noted that the restrictions under Section 4 of the MMDR Act are intrinsically meant to protect the environment and communities who depend on the environment.59.

More Retail Ltd Vs. The Excise Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

in the cases of Raman & Raman v. 34 State of Madras, A.l.R. 1959 S.C. 694; State of Assam v. Ajit Kumar, A.l.R. 1965 S.C.1196. However if the authority were under law obliged to exercise discretion, mandamus … Learned counsel for the petitioners is not disputing the fact that there is no provision under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 (Hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act, 1965’ for short) read with The Karnataka Excise (General Conditions of … Kabi Oncology Limited Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.) 3. 2018 SCC OnLine HP2069(Fresenuis Kabi Oncology Limited V. H.P. State Industrial Development Corporation … in name will not disturb a Company’s legal entity. As specified in Section 13(6) of Income Tax Act, 1961, A Company changes its name by … ANDHERI KURLA ROAD, ANDHERI (E), MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA - 400 059 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY VIVEK. S.,

M/s More Retail Private Limited Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

in the cases of Raman & Raman v. 34 State of Madras, A.l.R. 1959 S.C. 694; State of Assam v. Ajit Kumar, A.l.R. 1965 S.C.1196. However if the authority were under law obliged to exercise discretion, mandamus … Learned counsel for the petitioners is not disputing the fact that there is no provision under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 (Hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act, 1965’ for short) read with The Karnataka Excise (General Conditions of … Kabi Oncology Limited Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.) 3. 2018 SCC OnLine HP2069(Fresenuis Kabi Oncology Limited V. H.P. State Industrial Development Corporation … in name will not disturb a Company’s legal entity. As specified in Section 13(6) of Income Tax Act, 1961, A Company changes its name by … ANDHERI KURLA ROAD, ANDHERI (E), MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA - 400 059 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY VIVEK. S.,