Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the apprentices amendment act 2014 section 13 · Page 1 of about 42 results (0.036 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 25 2017

M. Ramani and Others Vs. Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corpora ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-25-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Apprentice is entitled for preference. 24. An argument was advanced stating that the Apprentice Act as amended vide Amendment Act, 2014 has crystallized the rights of the petitioners in a more definite manner. The amended Section 22(1) of the … 1 and 2 to formulate a Scheme for absorbing Ex-Apprentices as per the amended provision of Sec.22(1) of the Apprentices Act 1961.) Common Order: Since the relief sought for in all these writ petitions are identical, they were … therefore, the petitioners cannot place any reliance on the observations in para 13 of the decision in the case of U.P.State Transport Corporation (supra). Further,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2025

G.Sakthivel vs the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-12-2025

term trained apprentices under Chennai port Trust in the light of the amendment made to section 22 of the Apprentices act 1961 vide Act 29 of 2014 with effect from 22.12.2014.For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.R.Suresh For Respondent(s): Dr. K.Kannan, Spc … 4.A.Sudharsan S/o.Arumugham, No.15/39, 4th Street Kumaran Nagar, Kaladipet, Thiruvettiyur, Chennai- 19.5.V.Chandrasekar S/o.Veerapathiran, No.57, Adam Sahib Street, Rayapuram, Chennai- 13. 6.N.Nandakumar S/o. Natrajan, No. 41/48, Cannal Street, Triplicane, Chennai- 05. 7.G.Kuppusamy S/o.R.Govindan, No.6, 3rd Street, Triplicane, Chennai- 05.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2026

Indian Sugar Mills Association & Anr vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the impugned Amendment Act brought it into force on 1 April 2014. In other words, the impugned Amendment Act was made effective retrospectively.2. To … thus:Provision Before Amendment After Amendment Section 2(13) “employee” means any person “employee” means any person (other than an apprentice) (other than an apprentice) employed on a salary or wage employed on a salary or wage not exceeding … SHUKLA% JUDGMENT29.05.2026 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 1 of 38C. HARI SHANKAR, J.A. The lis1. The Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 20151, whichamended the Payment of Bonus Act, 19652, received Presidential assent on 31 December 2015 and was published

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 29 2026

Aviva Life Insurance Company India Ltd. vs Union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the impugned Amendment Act brought it into force on 1 April 2014. In other words, the impugned Amendment Act was made effective retrospectively.2. To … thus:Provision Before Amendment After Amendment Section 2(13) “employee” means any person “employee” means any person (other than an apprentice) (other than an apprentice) employed on a salary or wage employed on a salary or wage not exceeding … SHUKLA% JUDGMENT29.05.2026 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 1 of 38C. HARI SHANKAR, J.A. The lis1. The Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 20151, whichamended the Payment of Bonus Act, 19652, received Presidential assent on 31 December 2015 and was published

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2025

Tasmac Oozhiyar Manila Sammelanam(Citu) vs the Government of Tamilnadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-2025

this alternative proved ineffective in addressing the underlying issues. 5.In consequence, an amendment was made to the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act in the year 2003, … Standing Orders are brought into force and for implementing the TASMAC Code 2014 and the Circulars and Orders issued by the 3rd Respondent based on … workmen, in so far as it is contrary to the provisions of the Model Standing Orders as per Section 13 of the Standing Orders Act and direct the Respondents 2 and 3 and the officials of the 2nd … said Act shall apply: Provided that no such notice shall be necessary in the case of badli and apprentices.(3) No order of termination of service of a workman shall be made unless the workman is informed in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2014

Union of India and Others Vs. All India Postal Ed Employees Union (Pun ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-10-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

(13) of Section 2, being the definition clause, as under:- “(13) "employee" means any person (other than an apprentice) employed on a salary or wage not exceeding ten thousand rupees per mensem in any industry to do … has been entered into by the employees with their employer before the commencement of the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 1976 (23 of 1976).or (ii)where (ii)where the employees enter into any agreement or settlement with their employer after … THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Kang Gursharan Singh 2014.07.15 10:01 Civil Writ Petition No.13491 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : JULY10

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2023

K.K.Velayudhan vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-03-2023

amendment of the presidential Order in terms of WP(C) No. 12639 of 2019 :6:the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order (Amendment) Act, 2007 which received the assent of the President on 29 th August , 2007 and was published in … Challenging Ext P4, a revision was WP(C) No. 12639 of 2019 :4: preferred as per the provisions of Section 13 of the Kerala (Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1996. While so, … caste certificate issued by the 6th respondent. Petitioner was recruited as an apprentice in the 7th respondent factory in general quota and was absorbed in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2023

We The Women Of India Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2023

Subject : Right to Information

court’s discussion in paragraph 8 clarifies the position - although the required amendment explicitly laying this out in the Rules, would be appropriate. Points (ii) … of the POSH Act. 8 Section 14 of the POSH Act and Rule 10 of the Rules. 9 Section 13 of the POSH Act and Rule 9 of the Rules. 10 Section 21(1) of the POSH Act. 7 … whether the terms of employment are express or implied and includes a co-worker, a contract worker, probationer, trainee, apprentice or called by any other such name” 5 Section 2(g) reads as follows: “(g) "employer" means- (i) in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2026

K.R.Cholarajan, vs the State of Tamil ,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-13-2026

State and Subordinate Service Rules in proper perspective and applying Rule 8-A of the FSS Rules and the amendment made in fixing the inter se seniority between the direct recruits, have rightly passed the impugned order and … direct the respondents to refix the seniority of the petitioners from the date of their appointment as Forest Apprentice on 08.12.2014 and grant promotion for the post of Assistant Conservator of Forests based on their seniority. For … Section 40 (2) of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 also provides for a similar provision and the same is quoted … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on Pronounced on03.02.2026 13.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P. NOS.6145, 17629 OF 2024 W.P. NOS. 1829,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2018

Ex Navy Direct Entry Artificers Asso. Vs. The Union of India Ministry ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-08-2018

Subject : Education

after subregulation (1) as so amended, the following sub-regulation shall be inserted, namely:-- “(1A) New Entrants:--(a) Boys, Artificer, Apprentices and Direct Entry sailors may be enrolled for a period calculated to permit a period of 15 years' … their O.A. stands dismissed by the AFT vide order dated January 22, 2014. The appellants thereafter filed review petition seeking review of that judgment which … Entrants.” 11.After going through the various provisions of Navy Act, Navy 8 Regulations, Part III and the aforesaid amendments, the AFT culled out the relevant features in the form of salient points in the following manner:“25. Salient … been assailed by the appellants by way of instant appeal preferred under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007.4. We now advert to … while granting leave to appeal to the appellants. 13.We now proceed to take up the two questions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial