Advanced Search Results

M. Ramani and Others Vs. Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corpora ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 and 2 to formulate a Scheme for absorbing Ex-Apprentices as per the amended provision of Sec.22(1) of the Apprentices Act 1961.) Common Order: Since the relief sought for in all these writ petitions are identical, they were … Apprentice is entitled for preference. 24. An argument was advanced stating that the Apprentice Act as amended vide Amendment Act, 2014 has crystallized the rights of the petitioners in a more definite manner. The amended Section 22(1) of the

G.Sakthivel vs the Union of India

Court : Chennai

term trained apprentices under Chennai port Trust in the light of the amendment made to section 22 of the Apprentices act 1961 vide Act 29 of 2014 with effect from 22.12.2014.For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.R.Suresh For Respondent(s): Dr. K.Kannan, Spc … 2025:MHC:1943IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON: 30-07-2025PRONOUNCED ON: 12-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN AND WMP NO.6604 OF 20251. G.Sakthivel S/o.T.Ganesan, No.4/12, Gandhi Street, Lakshmipuram, Chrompet, Chennai- 44. 2.M.Dhanasekar

Aviva Life Insurance Company India Ltd. vs Union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the impugned Amendment Act brought it into force on 1 April 2014. In other words, the impugned Amendment Act was made effective retrospectively.2. To … SHUKLA% JUDGMENT29.05.2026 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 1 of 38C. HARI SHANKAR, J.A. The lis1. The Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 20151, whichamended the Payment of Bonus Act, 19652, received Presidential assent on 31 December 2015 and was published … thus:Provision Before Amendment After Amendment Section 2(13) “employee” means any person “employee” means any person (other than an apprentice) (other than an apprentice) employed on a salary or wage employed on a salary or wage not exceeding

Indian Sugar Mills Association & Anr vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the impugned Amendment Act brought it into force on 1 April 2014. In other words, the impugned Amendment Act was made effective retrospectively.2. To … SHUKLA% JUDGMENT29.05.2026 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 1 of 38C. HARI SHANKAR, J.A. The lis1. The Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 20151, whichamended the Payment of Bonus Act, 19652, received Presidential assent on 31 December 2015 and was published … thus:Provision Before Amendment After Amendment Section 2(13) “employee” means any person “employee” means any person (other than an apprentice) (other than an apprentice) employed on a salary or wage employed on a salary or wage not exceeding

Tasmac Oozhiyar Manila Sammelanam(Citu) vs the Government of Tamilnadu

Court : Chennai

this alternative proved ineffective in addressing the underlying issues. 5.In consequence, an amendment was made to the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act in the year 2003, … Standing Orders are brought into force and for implementing the TASMAC Code 2014 and the Circulars and Orders issued by the 3rd Respondent based on … said Act shall apply: Provided that no such notice shall be necessary in the case of badli and apprentices.(3) No order of termination of service of a workman shall be made unless the workman is informed in … issue necessary notification in this regard. 2) In this connection, it is informed that it is seen from sub-section (1-A) (a) of Section 17-C of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 (Tamil Nadu Act X of 1937) that

Cochin University of Science and Technology - Cusat vs Dr.P.V.Sasikuma ...

Court : Kerala

Act.8. The definition of 'employee' under section 2 (e) of the Act, as amended by Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2009 with retrospective effect from 03.04.1997, reads as under: “(e) “employee” means any person (other than an apprentice) … applicable to the university and that the university will not come within the purview of an ‘establishment’ under section 1(3) (c) or an 'employer' under section 2 (f) and the 1 st respondent will not come within the … 03.04.1997, reads as under: “(e) “employee” means any person (other than an apprentice) who is employed WP(C)7931/2022 6for wages, whether the terms of such employment

Independent Schools Federation Of India (regd.) Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Meena Phadke v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others., Writ Petition No.5508/ 2014. 8 For short, “PAG Act”. 9 For short, “Amendment Act, 2009”. Civil … the Payment of Gratuity Act, 19728, with retrospective effect from 3rd April 1997 vide the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 20099.3. The PAG Act enacted and enforced with effect from 16th September 1972, requires payment of gratuity to … retirement or resignation or on his death or disablement due to accident or disease.10 However, sub-section (3) to Section 1 of the PAG Act restricts its applicability to the following establishments : “1. Short title, extent, application and … Definitions. - xx xx xx (e) employee means any person (other than apprentice) employed on wages, in any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway

K.R.Cholarajan, vs the State of Tamil ,

Court : Chennai

State and Subordinate Service Rules in proper perspective and applying Rule 8-A of the FSS Rules and the amendment made in fixing the inter se seniority between the direct recruits, have rightly passed the impugned order and … direct the respondents to refix the seniority of the petitioners from the date of their appointment as Forest Apprentice on 08.12.2014 and grant promotion for the post of Assistant Conservator of Forests based on their seniority. For … Section 40 (2) of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 also provides for a similar provision and the same is quoted … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on Pronounced on03.02.2026 13.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P. NOS.6145, 17629 OF 2024 W.P. NOS. 1829,

Public Service Commission, Uttaranchal Vs. Jagdish Chandra Singh Bora ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to costs. ………………………….J.[Surinder Singh Nijjar]. …………………………..J.[Ranjana Prakash Desai]. New Delhi; March 3, 2014.-.---------------------- [1]. (1995) 2 SCC1[2]. (2000) 5 SCC438[3]. (1990) 3 SCC157[4]. (1990) 1 … aforesaid judgments, the trained apprentices claimed to be a class apart. It was claimed that the classification between the apprentices and others would not be only for the purpose of giving preferential treatment in the selection but also … 10 bonus marks to the trained apprentice candidates as per the “Uttaranchal Subordinate Service [Emergency Direct Recruitment (First Amendment)]. Rules, 2003” in the selection held by UPSC; and after adding 10 marks, merit list of the selected … No.2 to 10 who have secured higher marks than candidate No.1 who actually has lesser marks, if no weightage is given to his/her. Therefore, candidate … of minimum qualifying marks in the written examination. Section 4(11) provides that the PSCU shall prepare a

Ex Navy Direct Entry Artificers Asso. Vs. The Union of India Ministry ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

after subregulation (1) as so amended, the following sub-regulation shall be inserted, namely:-- “(1A) New Entrants:--(a) Boys, Artificer, Apprentices and Direct Entry sailors may be enrolled for a period calculated to permit a period of 15 years' … their O.A. stands dismissed by the AFT vide order dated January 22, 2014. The appellants thereafter filed review petition seeking review of that judgment which … Entrants.” 11.After going through the various provisions of Navy Act, Navy 8 Regulations, Part III and the aforesaid amendments, the AFT culled out the relevant features in the form of salient points in the following manner:“25. Salient … been assailed by the appellants by way of instant appeal preferred under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007.4. We now advert to