Advanced Search Results
Premchand Gupta Vs. Moolchand and ors.
Delhi
Mar-29-1982
Property
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 278
22(1982)DLT3; 1983RLR522
She died on 24-10-1962. Gupta applied for letters of administration on 29-1-1963 under section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The Will was challenged by Bal Kishan Dass, Jai Kishan Dass, Radhey Sham and Shayam Sunder Lal, sons … and restore that of the learned District Judge. Costs here shall be essy. Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63 & 278 - Letters of Administration--When can be granted--Execution and validity of the Will on suspicious circumstances
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Vanita SarIn Vs. State of Delhi
Delhi
Feb-13-2001
Family
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 278
2001IIIAD(Delhi)647
ORDERSharda Aggarwal, J.1. This is a petition under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of Letters of Administration with respect to the estate of Mrs. Marjorie M.Behl. who died on … ORDERSharda Aggarwal, J.1. This is a petition under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of Letters of Administration with respect to the estate
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKunvarjeet Singh Khandpur Vs. Kirandeep Kaur and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-03-2008
FamilyProperty
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 232, 264 and 278; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 5 - Scheudle - Articles 113, 120 and 137; Limitation Act, 1908 - Scheudle - Article 181; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Telegraph Act
AIR2008SC2058; 2008(2)AWC2024(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(2)CHN197; 2008(2)CTC850; 2008(2)KLT296(SC); (2008)4MLJ239(SC); 2008(6)SCALE112; (2008)8SCC463; 2008AIRSCW2726; 2008(8)SCC463; 2008(3)ICC263; MANU/SC/7451/2008
the testator- Mohinder Singh Khandpur has expired on 5.10.1995 and the petition under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (in short the 'Act') for grant of Letters of Administration was filed on 7.8.2002, and therefore, the same … application under any Act. But it has to be an application to a court for the reason that Sections 4 and 5 of the 1963 Limitation Act speak of expiry of prescribed period when court is closed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
ittoop Vs. Mathunni and anr.
Kerala
Nov-11-1983
Civil
Kerala Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1960 - Schedule - Articles 4 and 11(2); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 278
AIR1984Ker73
miscellaneous Appeal was the petitioner in O. P. No. 77 of 1981. It was a petition filed under Section 278 of the Succession Act for obtaining letters of administration with the will annexed. The father of the … arguments-before us are the following :--'Schedule I, Article 4.Memorandum of appeal against order in proceedings under the Indian Succession Act, 1925.An amount of one- halfthe scale of fee p r e-scribed in Article 1 on the amount or value
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Rabinder Singh and ors. Vs. the State
Delhi
Oct-09-2007
Family
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 218, 231 and 278
2008(102)DRJ50
Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This is an application under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act') for grant of letters of administration in respect of the will … Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This is an application under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act') for grant of letters
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmalorpava Mary and A. Arputha Josephine Vs. Kulandai Ammal,
Chennai
Feb-06-2004
Family
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 278, 287 and 384
AIR2004Mad291; 2004(2)CTC502; (2004)1MLJ634
with the Will dated 29-1-69. Civil Misc., Appeal is allowed. No costs. Family - letter of administration - Sections 63, 278, 287 and 384 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 - petition filed for grant of letter of … of Innasi Ammal, the appellants have filed the above appeal before this Court under Section 384 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.2. For convenience we may refer the parties as described in O.P. No. 278 of 87. In the matter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubal Paul Vs. Malina Paul and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-13-2003
PropertyCivil
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 268, 276, 278, 283(1), 284, 295, 296 and 299; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 35A, 91, 92, 95, 96, 100, 100A, 104, 104(2), 117 and 588 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 1 - Order 49, Rule 3; Hindu Marriages Act - Sections 28; Government of India Act - Sections 108; Trade Marks Act - Sections 76; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 217(1) and 218D; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 54
AIR2003SC1928; 2003(2)ALLMR(SC)703; 2003(1)CTC627; JT2003(5)SC193; 2003(2)SCALE373; (2003)10SCC361; [2003]1SCR1092
the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the High Court filed under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act. 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). 2. When this matter came up before a Bench of two Judges, … patent appeal would lie against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the High Court filed under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act. 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). 2. When this matter came … AIR1991MP11 ; Jyotirindra Nath Chowdhury v. Pratima Rani Debi ILR (1967) Cal. 278 and Balai Lall Banerjee and Ors. v. Debaki Kumar Ganguly and Ors.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Rajrani Sehgal Vs. Dr. Parshottam Lal and Others
Delhi
Dec-18-1991
Family
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 87, 82, 114, 138, 276 and 278; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 62, 63 and 68; Hindu Law
AIR1992Delhi134
fee Rs. 1000/-.55. Appeal dismissed. Family - probate - Sections 82, 87, 114, 138, 276 and 278 of Succession Act, 1925, Sections 62, 63 and 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Hindu Law - appellant challenged rejection of objection
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Suri Vs. State and ors.
Delhi
Oct-20-2003
Family
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 218, 222, 232, 276, 278 and 291; Administration of Estates Act, 1971 - Sections 8; Colonial Probate Act, 1892; Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925; Social Security Act, 1975
AIR2004Delhi9; 107(2003)DLT626; 2003(71)DRJ446; (2004)136PLR13
is to be appointed with sureties and securities taken for the due administration of the estate. The Indian Succession Act, 1925, that is the Act, was enacted in an era quite different from the modern times. Access to Courts … have the occasion to consider the same.30. Petition stands allowed in the above terms. Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 218 and 278--Grant of probate--Will--Execution of--Deceased did not appoint any executor of the Will--In the absence of an
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs. Radhika Khanna Vs. State
Delhi
Mar-22-2001
Family
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276 and 278; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 23, Rule 1
91(2001)DLT96
Khanna (hereinafter referred to as 'petitioner') in the petition filed under sections 276 and 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 which was allowed by the other dated 7th March 1994, is that Smt. Kamla Khanna, her mother and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »