Advanced Search Results

Rathindra Lal Chakraborty and anr. Vs. Paramartha Sadhak Sangha

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Family

T.N.K. Singh, J.1. The present appeal under Section 299 of mejndian Succession Act, 1925 is directed against the judgment and order dated 09.04.99 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Shri S.

Raj Kumari Sharma Vs. Rajinder Nath Dewan and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 111

Reported in : AIR1987Delhi323; 1987(13)DRJ139

and female heirs in view of changed social and economic conditions. The provisions of Section 111 of the Succession Act, 1925 and the intention of the testator to benefit his legal heirs in his Will of 1942 is to … We are fortified by the decision in Dinesh Chandra Roy v. Biraj Kamin (1912) 39 Cal 87, under Section 99 of the Indian Succession Act, 1865 corresponding to Section 112 but the wording of the Exception in Sections

Shri Shridhar and Baba Keshav Phadke and ors. Vs. Shri Shivram and Bal ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilFamily

Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR744

with al 1 the power of a District Judge to take cognizance of any contested proceeding under Indian Succession Act, 1925, arising within the local limits of their respective jurisdiction that may be transferred to them by their respective … the matter for 16 years after the proceedings were instituted.8. In this connection, I may also refer to Section 99 of the Code of Civil Procedure where it is clearly provided that no decree shall be reversed or

Km. Rakhi and Another Vs. Ist Additional District Judge, Firozabad and ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 371; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 21, 21(1), 21A and 99 - Order XVIII, Rule 17A - Order XXXIII, Rule 1 - Order XLI, Rule 27; Suit Valuation Act - Sections 11; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 379(2)(3) and 388; Court-fees Act, 1870 - Schedule-I, Article 12; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 10 and 16; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 25 (1)

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC323

(i) Civil - jurisdiction - Section 371 of Indian Succession Act , 1925 , Sections 21, 21A and 99 of Code of Civil Procedure,1908 and … should be remanded for fresh decision. He then contends that by reason of Section 379 of the Indian Succession Act, the application for Succession Certificate should have accompanied by a deposit of a sum equivalent to the court … , had held that policy of legislation of Section 21 of the Code, is the same as in Section 99 of the Code and Section 11 of the Suits Valuation Act, that is to say, to treat the

Claude Pinto and Others Vs. M.V. Shankar Bhat and Another

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 82, 88, 211(1), 258, 259 and 307(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 7 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 99 - Order I, Rule 10(2) - Order 22, Rule 4 - Order 41, Rule 27; Probate and Administration Act - Sections 45; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20 and 20(2)

Reported in : AIR1996Kant366; ILR1996KAR2229; 1996(3)KarLJ342

Probate and Administration Act -- V of 1881. This is found in the book 'Paruck on the Indian Succession Act 1925', 8th Edition by Salil K. Roy Choudhury and H. K. Saharay at page 601. Either any of the … Will should be read as a whole to ascertain the intention of the testatrix as laid down in Section 82 of the Indian Succession Act. He relied on the decision of the Privy Council in the case … the case of Kalidas Chandra v. Jugal Kishore Datta (ILR 1962 Cal 998) in which case it was held that where the defendant is sued

Smt. Putuli Begum and Others Vs. Smt. Rehana Begum

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

1. Challenge in this appeal is made under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 against the order dated 15.07.2006 passed in Succession Revocation Misc. (J) Case No. 2 of 2002 whereby and

Smt. Putuli Begum and Others Vs. Smt. Rehana Begum

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

1. Challenge in this appeal is made under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 against the order dated 15.07.2006 passed in Succession Revocation Misc. (J) Case No. 2 of 2002 whereby and

Kasinath Patel Vs. Radha Bai and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD859; 2005(4)ALT740

original owner of the suit land. He died issueless. According to him, under the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 if a Hindu husband dies issueless, his wife alone succeeds to his estate. As defendant No. 1's husband … Will Ex.B9 as attesting witnesses, only one attesting witness has been examined, and as per the provisions of Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 at least … in Sridevi and Ors. v. Jayaraja Shetty and Ors., 2005 (2) ALD 99 (SC). In the said case, a similar suspicious circumstance as to the

Nand Kishore Rai and anr. Vs. Mst. Bhagi Kuer and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 281; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 99 - Order 6, Rule 15

Reported in : AIR1958All329

was advanced and the appeal is dismissed with costs. Civil - verification of petition -- Section 281 of Succession Act, 1925 and Order 6 Rule 15 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - non-compliance of Section 281 for verification … greater effect or value. Omission to verify, or defective verification of, a pleading is a mere irregularity within Section 99, C. P. C. and is never fatal. The provision of Section 281 of the Succession Act is less

Babu Lal Grand Sons Family Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1989)31ITD52(Delhi)

and therefore, in view of Section 14 of the Transfer, of Property Act, 1908 and Section 114 of Succession Act, 1925, the tying-up of property beyond the minority of the persons to whom the Trust created belonged, was against … referred to the decision of Delhi High Court in the case of Gee Vee Enterprises v.Addl. CIT [1975] 99 ITR 375 and the decision of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Addl. CIT v.