Advanced Search Results

Pressy Pinto Vs. Rony Maxim Pinto and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 35A, 91, 92, 95, 295 and 299; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24; Karnataka Court-Fee and Suits Valuation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(2), 2(14), 96, 104 and 144 - Order 7, Rule 10 - Order 9, Rules 9 and 13 - Order 11, Rule 21 - Order 21, Rules 34, 72, 92 and 106(1) - Order 22, Rules 9 and 10 - Order 25, Rule 2 - Order 33, Rules 5 and 7 - Order 35, Rules 3, 4 and 6 - Order 37, Rules 2, 3 and 6 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A, 4 and 10 -Order 40, Rules 1 and 4 - Order 41, Rules 1, 2, 19, 21, 23 and 23A - Order 43, Rules 1 and 2 and Order 47, Rule 4

Reported in : AIR2009Kant157; 2009(5)KarLJ601; 2009(4)AIRKarR281

of the observation of learned single Judge on earlier occasion in RFA 324/02.3. Sections 295, 299 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and so also Sections 96, 104 and Order 43, Rules 1 and 2 of the C.P.C. are relevant … for the time being in force, from no other orders:(ff) an order under Section 35-A;(ffa) an order under Section 91 or Section 92 refusing leave to institute a suit of the nature referred to in Section 91 or

Gotiram Nathu Mendre Vs. Sonabai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 91 - Schedule - Articles 44 and 91; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 59 - Schedule - Article 59; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 211, 307, 307(1) and 307(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 32, Rule 7(1) - Order 41, Rule 25; Bombay Rent Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1970Bom73; (1969)71BOMLR157; ILR1969Bom402

No. 1 contended that Sakhubai was constituted an 'executor within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which defines an executor as meaning a person to whom the execution of the last will of a … ab initio void. Unless the sale deed was set aside by a suit under the provisions of Art. 91 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, it was good against the plaintiff. In any event, the plaintiff attained

Twinkle Jatin Khanna @ Twinkle Akshay Kumar Vs. Anita Advani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

has limited effect and cannot deprive such party to seek revocation of probate u/s 263 of the Indian Succession Act 1925. Reliance is placed on the judgment of Supreme Court in case of Elizabeth Anthony Vs Mchel Charles John … the respondent filed another complaint before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate against the applicant and her family members under section 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code inter alia praying for production of original will of Mr. Rajesh Khanna. It

Subal Paul Vs. Malina Paul and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 268, 276, 278, 283(1), 284, 295, 296 and 299; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 35A, 91, 92, 95, 96, 100, 100A, 104, 104(2), 117 and 588 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 1 - Order 49, Rule 3; Hindu Marriages Act - Sections 28; Government of India Act - Sections 108; Trade Marks Act - Sections 76; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 217(1) and 218D; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 54

Reported in : AIR2003SC1928; 2003(2)ALLMR(SC)703; 2003(1)CTC627; JT2003(5)SC193; 2003(2)SCALE373; (2003)10SCC361; [2003]1SCR1092

the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the High Court filed under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act. 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). 2. When this matter came up before a Bench of two Judges, … for the time being in force. from no other orders:'(ff) an order under Section 35A:(ffa) an order under Section 91 or Section 92 refusing leave to institute a suit of the nature referred to in Section 91 or

E.i. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Klaus Mittelbachert (Deceased) Through L.Rs.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306

Reported in : 2002ACJ549; AIR2002Delhi124; 95(2002)DLT617; 2002(62)DRJ476

prosecuting the suit. 10. Learned Single Judge after referring to the provisions of Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and to the judgment of Supreme Court in M. Veerappa v. Eyelyn Sequeira and Ors. : [1988]2SCR606 held

Satish Chander Sabharwal and anr. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Amendment Act, 2002; Bihar Land Encroachment Act - Sections 54; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 299; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9), 4, 35A, 91, 92, 95, 100A, 104, 104(1), 104(2) - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : 122(2005)DLT170; 2005(83)DRJ40

in the concerned statutory enactment.13. The Apex Court has also considered this issue in respect of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 ( hereinafter to be referred to as, 'the said Act' ) itself in Subal Paul v. Malina Paul … the time being in force, from no other orders :-(ff) an order under Section 35A;(ffa) and order under Section 91 or Section 92 refusing leave to institute a suit of the nature referred to in Section 91 or

Cauvery Belliappa (Since Deceased) By L.Rs. and Another Vs. B.B. Cheng ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

as the proof of the Will is concerned, he would point out that Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 requires a Will to be attested by two witnesses. In the present case on hand, it cannot be … SCC 503 and Janki Narayan Bhoir v. Narayan Namdeo Kadam AIR 2003 SC 761 : (2003) 2 SCC 91, to assert that an attesting witness must be proved by evidence to have animo attestandi or animus or

Anand Versha & Anr vs Narender Kumar Sharma (Deceased) Thr Lrs &am ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

making the will, by operation of law, the will stands revoked. (See Sections 69 and 70 of the Succession Act, 1925.) Registration of a will does not make it any more effective.Conclusionxxx xxx xxx24. We therefore reiterate that immovable … of varying the contract as between the parties to the contract; but, no such limitations are imposed under Section 91. Having regard to the jural position of Sections 91 and 92 and the deliberate omission from Section 91

N. Anantha Kumar Vs. P. Anjaneyulu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 30; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59 and 63

Reported in : 2004(4)ALT98

provisions of Section 30 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, r/w. Sections 59 and 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.3. The learned Counsel for the appellant/plaintiff had taken this Court thoroughly through the findings recorded by the Court

Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. versus Suresh Chand and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]9S.C.R.339

u/s.53A of TP Act, which deals with Part Performance. Headnotes† Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - s.54 - Succession Act, 1925 - s.63 - Evidence Act, 1872 - s.68 - Respondent no.1/plaintiff filed suit no. 613/1997 for possession, mesne … by a contract for sale is recognised in Section 3 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and in Section 91 of the Trusts Act. The personal obligation created by a contract of sale is described in Section 40