Advanced Search Results

Subara Bi @ Tharama Bi Vs. Bhasheeria,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149(2), 163, 163A, 165, 166, 166(1), 168, 169, 170 and 173; ;Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Section 110A and 110C; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 306; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 77; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27

injuries sustained were because of accident due to use of motor vehicle for claiming compensation - Held: yes.Succession Act, 1925, Section 306 - Actio personalis moritur cum persona - Abatement - Whether the claim of the injured for the … follows:Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Section 110-C [Section 169 of 1988 Act] and Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 74 and 77-Claims Tribunal - Procedure and powers - Public document - Whether post-mortem report, inquest report and panchnama could be

Kasturi and anr. Vs. Venu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1996)2MLJ453

progeny used in the earlier part of the Will and the provisions of Section 84 of the Indian Succession Act. 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') would have no application to the case on hand where there is … provisions of Section 88 of the Act are not attracted and on the other hand it is only Section 77 of the Act which could be applied to the case on hand and that if the word used

Maniklal Shah Vs. Hiralal Shaw

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35 and 77; ; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923; ; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 300, 300(1), 300(2) and 800; ; Probate and Administration Act, 1881 - Section 2; ; Succession (Amendment) Act, 1929 - Section 2

Reported in : AIR1950Cal377,54CWN225

the concurrent jurisdiction which the High Court has with the District Judge under Sub-section (1) of Section 300, Succession Act, 1925, is restricted by Sub-section (2) of that section.It is pointed out that the present case is one to … and is admissible under Section 35, Evidence Act. Any entry in such a register can be proved under Section 77, Evidence Act by the production of a certified copy thereof. 'The question is how much of the entry

Rama Pati Tiwari Vs. District Registrar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : FamilyCivil

Reported in : AIR2009All102; 2009(2)AWC1203

to be established by a probate case by a petition for probate under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 or in a regular civil suit before a civil court where such a 'Will' is produced for claiming … 1908. It was dismissed on 27.3.1982. Therefore, he instituted Original Suit No. 289 of 1982 on 21.4.1982 under Section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908 for a decree directing the registering authority to register the 'Will'. In the

Jugdish Chander Vs. Punjab National Bank

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 9; Successsion Act - Sections 213

Reported in : 1998RLR254

settled that it is not necessary to obtain letters of administration per Sections 211 and 212 of the Succession Act, 1925 and cases which are of relevance and as cited above may now be referred.(19) In Jogendra Chander V. … dated 2.1.69 of deft. Bank to the pff. which is Exhibited as PW4/25.(14) Reference is also made to Section 16 Limitation Act which reads : S.16. Effect of death of before the accrual of the right to

Jayamma Vs. Maria Bai Dead by Proposed Lrs. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 2(12), 2(17), 21, 21(1), 24, 48A(4), 48A(5), 48A(5A), 61, 61(1), 61(3) and 77; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 213, 276 and 299; Hindu Law; Indian Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR2004SC3957; 2005(1)CTLJ292(SC); JT2004(6)SC57; 2004(6)SCALE332; (2004)7SCC459

may be noticed.3. The appellant herein filed an application purported to be under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of letters of administration with a copy of the Will dated 20.2.1984 annexed purported to have … the State Government free from all encumbrances and shall be disposed in accordance with the provisions of Section 77.'11. On a bare perusal of the aforementioned provisions, it would appear that whereas Section 21 refers to sub-division,

Ashok Kumar Kapur and ors. Vs. Ashok Khanna and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 11, 31, 33, 34, 45, 56, 77 and 83; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3(1); Trustees and Mortgagees Powers Act, 1866 - Sections 43; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 302; Charitable and Religious Trusts Act, 1920 - Sections 7; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Official Trustees Act, 1930 - Sections 10(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 90 - Order 1, Rule 8; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rules 14 and 88; Calcutta High Court Rules - Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 68 and 142

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC2091(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(2)CHN222; JT2007(4)SC362; 2007(4)SCALE265; (2007)5SCC189; [2007]75SCL193(SC); 2007AIRSCW1865; 2007(4)CivilLJ390; 2007(3)KCCR1666(SC).

Act and not otherwise. Similar provisions exist in the Official Trustees Act, 1930, Section 302 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 7 of the Charitable and Religious Trusts Act, 1920. The courts of India have all along … finally decide the rights of the persons interested in the trust. RELEVANT STATUTORY PROVISIONS : Sections 11, 56, 77 and 83, which are relevant for the purpose of this appeal, read as under : "11. Trustee to

A.S.Dhanapal Vs. the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 - Section 80, 81(4), 82, 87(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226; Code of Civil Procedure(CPC), 1908 - Section 8087-B; Railways, Act, 1890 - Section 77; Bombay Rent Act, 1947 - Section 15; Succession Act, 1925 - Section 213; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5-A; Companies Act, 1956 - Section 108; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Section 20(1); Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 - Section 55; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 33(2)(b)

(Vide Waman Shriniwas .. Vs .. Ratilal Bhagwandas & Co., (A.I.R. 1959 S.C. 689)), Section 213 of the Succession Act, 1925 (Vide Hem Nolini Juddah .. Vs ..Isolyne Sarojabashini Bose (A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 1471)), Section 5-A of the Prevention … Gaekwar Baroda State Railway .. Vs .. Hafiz Habib-ul-Haq (A.I.R. 1938 PC 165 = (1938) 47 L.W. 753)), Section 77 of the Railways, Act, 1890 (Vide G.G. in Council .. Vs .. Masaddi Lal (A.I.R. 1961 SC 725)),

Rangku Dutta @ Ranjan Kumar Dutta Vs. State of Assam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities - Sections 19, 20(A)(1), 3, 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 3(2)(1), 120B, 302

77 of the Railways Act, 1890; section 15 of the Bombay Rent Act, 1947; section 213 of the Succession Act, 1925; section 5-A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947; section 7 of the Stamp Act, 1899; section 108 of

Late Sh Harendra Pal Singh the Lrs & Ors. Vs.rishi Pal Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

between “vested interest” and “contingent interest” as well as distinction between Sections 119 and 120 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, on the question of Will or settlement, had come up for consideration before the Supreme Court with reference … of 24 been held that Chandra Kala and even Padma Singh were bound by the said compromise agreement.21. Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 reads as under:-"“14. Property of a female Hindu to be her … Division Bench referred to Vynior case [Trin 7 Jac 1 Rot 26 77 ER595 and observed: (Mondol case[(1909-10) 14 CWN174: (1909) 9 Cal LJ644 ,