Advanced Search Results
C.G. David Tharakan Vs. Dr. Mrs. Lily Jacob
Kerala
Jul-16-1992
Family
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 70
AIR1993Ker9; I(1994)DMC154
this contention, the question that arises for consideration is whether the Will dated 18-7-1974 was validly revoked. 12. Section 70 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', provides for revocation of unprivileged Will … ordered to be numbered as a suit, as provided by Rule 26 of the Rules under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, Appendix-XII to the Civil Rules of Practice, Kerala. Petitioner in the Original Petition is the plaintiff and the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaikhushru Jehangir Vs. Bai Bachubai Jehangir and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-23-1948
PropertyCivil
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 70
AIR1951Bom339; (1950)52BOMLR694
between attorney & client out of the estate. 18. Certificate for two counsel. Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925), Section 70 - Will-Codicil-Revocation of will and codicil-Revival of mill and codicil by a subsequent codicil-Revocation of subsequent codicil-Revival of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Jagadish Vs. Dr. S. Kumaraswamy since dead by LR's S.K. Lingaraju a ...
Karnataka
Mar-20-2007
Family
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63 and 70; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100
ILR2008KAR87; 2008(2)KCCRSN119; 2008(3)ICC421
is upheld and consequently the plaintiffs suit for partition is dismissed.Parties to bear their own costs. (A) Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 63 - Execution of unprivileged Wills - Section 70 - Revocation of unprivileged Will or Codicil
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bhagat Ram and anr. Vs. Suresh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-25-2003
PropertyFamily
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 63 and 70; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 58 and 59
AIR2004SC436; 2004(2)AWC1179(SC); (SCSuppl)2003(2)CHN144; 98(2004)CLT114(SC); [2004(2)JCR150(SC)]; 2003(10)SCALE13; (2003)12SCC35
Act?Question-1:11. 'Will' and 'codicil' are defined respectively in Clauses (h) and (b) of Section 2 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 as under:-'(h) 'will' means the legal declaration of the intention of a testator with respect to his property … same time, and no particular form of attestation shall be necessary.'13. It is also relevant to refer to Section 70 which provides that no unprivileged will on codicil, nor any part thereof, shall be revoked otherwise than by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSridevi Amma and ors. Vs. Venkitaparasurama Ayyan and ors.
Kerala
Jan-27-1959
FamilyProperty
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 70, 90 and 124; Cochin Law
AIR1960Ker1
provision corresponding to Section 24 of the English Wills Act 1837 or to S. 90 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The provision under the common law of England before the Statute of 1837 was that a testamentary disposition … Bequests to religious or charitable uses. Nor have we any provision for revocation of unprivileged wills as in Section 70 of the Indian Succession Act as follows :'Section 70. No unprivileged will or codicil, nor any part thereof,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadhabai Balasaheb Shirke (Since Deceased, Through Her Heirs and L.Rs ...
Mumbai
Feb-28-2007
Family
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8 to 10, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2) and 16; Hindu Womens Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3) and 3(4); ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 70 and 72; Hindu Succession (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1994; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100
2007(2)ALLMR823; 2007(5)BomCR324
of Bhikubai and Mahadeo were valid and whether Bhikubai revoked the Will under Section 70 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short,('the Act of 1925').Both the Wills were held to be valid and the contention that Bhikubai revoked
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevi Charan Vs. Durga Porshad Chhanu Lal and ors.
Delhi
Feb-15-1967
Property
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 70
AIR1967Delhi128
order that each party should bear his own costs throughout.(42)Appeal allowed. Property - will - Section 70 of Succession Act, 1925 - in event of non existence of original will whether it can be said to have been destroyed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBandara Veeramma and ors. Vs. Chirtravuri Ramakrishna Sarma and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-18-1975
Property
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 70 and 71
AIR1976AP370
reason. We dismiss this appeal with costs.24. Appeal dismissed. Property - attestation of will - Section 63 of Succession Act, 1925 and Sections 70 and 71 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - suit for partition of properties as estate
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Jaswant Kaur Vs. Smt. Amrit Kaur and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-25-1976
FamilyProperty
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 70; Evidence Act - Sections 68
AIR1977SC74; (1977)1SCC369; [1977]1SCR925
respondents the costs of this Court and of the High Court. Family - Will - Section 70 of Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - dispute related to validity of Will - High Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDurga Prashad Vs. Debi Charan and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-19-1978
Family
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 70
AIR1979SC145; (1979)1SCC61; [1979]1SCR873; 1978(10)LC911(SC)
of the revocation of the will in view of the express provisions of Section 70 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 hereinafter called the Act. It was contended in the alternative that even if the presumption was available to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »