Advanced Search Results

Manmohan Singh and anr. Vs. Joginder Kaur and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 208, 214, 276 and 295

Reported in : 2002(64)DRJ293

was maintaining all the expenses including those of kitchen. Further that as per Section 62 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, it is the last Will that prevails Section 62 provides as under:32. Will may be revoked or altered … up by the plaintiff.61. Will is to be proved like any other document except to the extent of Section 65 of the Evidence Act which requires the examination of attesting witnesses if available. However, in case there are

Lakshmi Murali vs M.Rajan

Court : Chennai

is to be proved in terms of the provisions of Section 68 of the Evidence Act and the Succession Act, 1925. The propounder of the Will is called upon to show by satisfactory evidence that the Will was signedby … conclusion that, the Ex.A2 Certified Copy of Will 01.09.1995 can be looked into as secondary evidence by relying section 65(c) of Indian Evidence Act and ignoring that, non pleading and no explanation in the plaint and evidence regarding

M.V.P. Rama Rao and anr. Vs. to Whomsoever It May Concern

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 63(3), 65, 222 and 299; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68

Reported in : 1993(2)ALT187

Mohammed Quadri, J.1. The short question that arises in this appeal filed under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short the Act) is: Whether the appellants are entitled to grant of probate under Section 222 of … may be expressed or by necessary implication. It necessarily leads to the enquiry as to whether the will. Section 65 of the Act defines the privileged wills. It reads as follows:-'Any soldier being employed in an expedition or

L. Bakthavatsalam and ors. Vs. R. Alagiriswamy (Died) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 30 and 63; Central Act, 1986; Indian Succession Act, 1956; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63, 65, 68, 69, 71 and 80; Specific Relief Act - Sections 34; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 58 and 60; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3, 14, 15 and 16; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145; Central Act, 1986; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2, Rule 2

Reported in : 2007(5)CTC513; (2007)6MLJ128

has not been taken note of by the learned First Appellate Judge. 45. Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 speaks about the execution of unprivileged Wills, which reads as under:63. Execution of unprivileged Wills. - Every testator, … absolutely no evidence to show that the Will is in existence at all. It is his contention that Section 65(c) of the Indian Evidence Act has no application, since there was no corresponding pleading at all. He would

N.Jagannathan. Vs.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Court of Wards Act, 1902 - Section 60; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 296; Madras High Court Original Side Rules - Order 25 Rule 65,; Constitution of India - Articles 215

submitted by Mr.Satish Parasaran, learned counsel appearing for one of the respondents in the appeals, under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 there is absolutely no provision enabling a party to send the Letters of Administration obtained from India to … in collusion and accordingly, as per the provisions of Order XXV Rule 65 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, which is as follows:"Order … under the Tamil Nadu Court of Wards Act, 1902 has absolutely no meaning. On a bare reference to Section 60 of the Tamil Nadu Court of Wards Act, 1902, which is claimed to be a provision under

S.A. Quddus Vs. S. Veerappa and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33, 65 and 68; Karnataka Registration Rules, 1965 - Rules 81; Mysore Registration Rules, 1965 - Rule 81

Reported in : AIR1994Kant20

that Will has been duly proved. Its execution and attestation as required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 are proved. The contentions therefore raised with regard to the validity of the Will stand rejected. Validity of

P.Eswari, vs Nallappa Gounder(Died)

Court : Chennai

so. Since other witness was not examined, Ex-B.4 is not proved as per Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.11.3. The Trial Court permitted the defendants’ side to … it appears that the custody of the original of Ex-B.4 - Will is with the plaintiff. As per Section 65 (a) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, when the original of a document appears to be in the

Shri.Vimal Appayya Markal vs Smt.Gulabi W/O Arjun Inchal and Smt.Gulab ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

in evidence, the execution of the Will is not proved in accordance with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872. The contention of defendant No.1-the legatee under the Will … be done in particular manner. Secondary evidence should have to be received only on compliance of provisions of Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1925 (Section 60 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 ).5. It is for the

Mrs. Pushpa Vadera Vs. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Education

Reported in : (1996)87CompCas921

no effect as the will has not been executed and attested in the manner provided under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The witness clause of the will reads as under : "In witness whereof, I have signed this will … will forwarded. The respondent-company has also invited attention to articles 62 and 65 of the articles of association of the company which are reproduced hereunder … on March 28, 1990, by Mrs. Pushpa Vadera, an Indian inhabitant (hereinafter referred to as "the appellant") under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956, for issuance of necessary directions to Thomas Cook (India) Limited (hereinafter referred

Chandramohan Vs. Shanmugavalli

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Evidence Act - Section 63, 68, 69, 70, 65(c), 90; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 59, 63(c); Registration Act 1908 - Section 52, 60

statutory requirements of proving the Will. A Will must be proved in terms of Section 63(c) of the Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872. In the event the provisions thereof cannot be complied with, … title is based, is required to be proved by primary evidence and secondary evidence may be given under Section 65(c) of the Evidence Act. But, before that, loss of the original Will was required to be proved. It