Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 57 · Page 1 of about 663 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 22 2007

Madhukar Rajanna Darbhe Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-22-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 57, 213, 213(1) and 213(2); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 3, 118 and 119; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1962; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 331; Hindu Disposition of Property Act, 1916; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR339; 2008(2)BomCR418

challenged in these 2 Writ Petitions on the ground that provisions of Section 57(a) and (b) of Indian Succession Act, 1925, violate Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India with prayer to hold that Probate is required

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2005

Mukesh Ramchandra Bhardwaj Vs. Usha Vasantrao Kathale

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-15-2005

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 213(1) and 213(2)

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR266; 2005(6)BomCR426; 2005(3)MhLj425

not obtain a probate of the Will as required by Sub-section (1) of Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 as well as as per the law laid down by this Court in the case of Babasaheb Yeshwant … Bank at Bhandara and, therefore, it does not fall within the ambit of Sub-clauses (a) and (b) of Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act and, therefore, in view of provisions of Sub-clause (c) of Section 57 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1969

Vrandavanla Goverdhanlal Pitti and anr. Vs. Kamala Bai Goverdhanlal an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-01-1969

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59 to 190, 211, 213, 222 and 237 to 260

Reported in : AIR1970AP109

amended by Act XXI of 1870) corresponding to the sections set out in Schedule III of the Indian Succession Act 1925 were made applicable to all wills and codicils specified in clauses (a) and (b) of Section 57 wherever

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 29 2001

S. Maldi Reddy (Dead) by His Lrs. Vs. M. Ramakrishna Reddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-29-2001

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57 and 213(1) and (2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 3

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD128; 2001(4)ALT586

is clear from the bare reading of Section 213(2) read with Section 57(a) and (b) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 that the prohibition contained in sub-section (1) of Section 213 applies to wills executed by Hindus on or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2004

N. Anantha Kumar Vs. P. Anjaneyulu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-20-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 30; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59 and 63

Reported in : 2004(4)ALT98

provisions of Section 30 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, r/w. Sections 59 and 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.3. The learned Counsel for the appellant/plaintiff had taken this Court thoroughly through the findings recorded by the Court … was enacted subsequent thereto repealing the Acts of 1865 and 1870, but incorporating the provisions thereof in Sections 57(a) and (b) and in 1926 the Act was amended and the provisions of Section 63 of the Indian

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2001

Mrs. Winifred Nora theophilus Vs. Mr. Lila Deane and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-10-2001

Subject : Family Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 47, 57, 213 and 213(1) and (2); Indian Siuccession (Amendment) Act, 1962

Reported in : AIR2002Delhi6; 2001(62)DRJ422

is mentioned in the plaint that parties are Indian Christians as defined in Section 2(d) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The pedigree table of the family of the parties is shown in para-1 of the plaint.2. The dispute … Buddhist, Sikh or Jaina where such wills are of the classes specified in clauses (a) an d(b) of Section 57; and (ii) in the case of wills made by any Parsi dying, after the commencement of the Indian

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2004

Smt. Bimla Gaindher Vs. Smt. Usha Gaindher and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-17-2004

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 213, 214, 299, 370, 372 and 387

Reported in : AIR2004All329; 2004(2)AWC1855

A.K. Yog, J.1. Above First Appeal From Order under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (called 'the Act'), filed by Smt. Bimla Gaindhar Is against the judgment and order dated March 12th, 1996 … 'Will', in question did not fall in either of the category contemplated under Clauses (a) or (b) of Section 57 read with Section 213 of the Act.5. The sole question required to be decided in the instant case

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2004

Prabhakar S/O Chinappa Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-29-2004

Subject : Family

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 8 and 29(3); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57 and 213(2)

Reported in : 2004(4)MhLj886

Shri Bhangde further submitted that in view of the provisions ofSection 213 read with Section 57 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Succession Act'), when a right as executor or legatee is to be established

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2003

Shri Bhagwanji Karsanbhai Rathod Vs. Shri Surajmal Anandraj Mehta

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-08-2003

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57 and 213; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1962

Reported in : AIR2003Bom387; 2003(4)ALLMR85; 2003(5)BomCR228; 2004(1)MhLj62

not necessary in view of the plain language of Section 213 read with section 57 of the Indian Succession Act 1925. If that argument was to be accepted then, obviously there was no other ground which has been held

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2001

Gangavath Lalu Vs. Gangavathi Tulsi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-13-2001

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 213 and 213(1)

Reported in : AIR2001AP326; 2001(2)ALT437

been executed.11. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Hari Sreedhar submits that the relevant provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act'), more particularly Sections 57 and 213 of the Act were not placed and brought … learned counsel for the petitioner that it is abundantly clear from a reading of Section 213(2) read with Section 57(a) and (b) of the Act that whatever prohibition contained in Sub-section (1) of Section 213 of the Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial