Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 56 · Page 1 of about 511 results (0.053 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 21 1991

Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth Annamalai Vs. Mrs. Valliammai Achi, W/O of Late Dr. Al ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-1991

Subject : Family

Acts : T.N. Court-fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Schedule - Sections 55, 56, 61 and 63 - Articles 1 to 6, 7, 11(K); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222, 261, 264, 265, 266, 268, 276, 284, 295 and 299; High Court Original Side Rules - Order 25, Rules 4, 25, 55, 689, 690 and 692; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 235; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). 1908 - Sections 26, 75 to 78, 86, 87-B, 90 to 92, 94, 95, 100, 104, 141 and 144 - Order 41 Rule 1; Original Side Rules, 1956 - Order 2, Rules 2, 20 to 50, 51 to 68; Government of India Act, 1915; Indian Oaths Act, 1873; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Parition Act, 1893; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890; Indian Divorce Act,1869; Specific Relief Act, 1877; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940; Indian Stamp Act, 1899;

Reported in : AIR1991Mad284

the plaintiff filed the O. P. No. 197 of 1988 under Ss. 222 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with O. XXV, Rule 4 of the Original Side Rules. In the said petition, the petitioner sought … Schedule I of the Tamil Nadu Court-fees Act could not be made applicable because in a preceding under Section 295 of the Indian Succession Act properties were not the subject matter of the dispute. The matter under … estate is stated in the petition and provision is made in S. 56 of theAct for the purpose of the computation of the fee chargeable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1975

P.C. Saxena Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-28-1975

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372; Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 56(2) and 73A

Reported in : [1976]104ITR106(Delhi)

there will be no order as to costs. Direct Taxation - succession certificate - Section 372 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Sections 56 (2) and 73A of Estate Duty Act, 1953 - appellant failed to comply with condition

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 1977

Rani Pravabati Roy and ors. Vs. Saileshnath Roy and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-14-1977

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 142, 150, 202 and 214; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 56

Reported in : AIR1978Cal147

v. Ashutosh Mukherjee it has been held that the Court in exercising jurisdiction under Section 202 of the Succession Act, 1925 is acting in pursuance of the testamentary and intestate jurisdiction with which it is vested and not of … in view of our finding that legacy is demonstrative and not specific we hold that the provisions of Section 56 of the Contract Act are not applicable to this compromise decree and the compromise decree cannot be held

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 30 2001

E.i. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Klaus Mittelbachert (Deceased) Through L.Rs.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-30-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306

Reported in : 2002ACJ549; AIR2002Delhi124; 95(2002)DLT617; 2002(62)DRJ476

prosecuting the suit. 10. Learned Single Judge after referring to the provisions of Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and to the judgment of Supreme Court in M. Veerappa v. Eyelyn Sequeira and Ors. : [1988]2SCR606 held … which the plaintiff claimed Rs. 25,000/- on account of doctors services and hospitalisation in India along with DM 56,22,500.00 (equivalent to Rs. 1,91,24,150.00 at the rate of exchange prevailing at the time of filing of the suit)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 1971

P.P. Sathya Bhama Vs. M.A. John and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-02-1971

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 56, 58, 61, 63 and 83; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 142, 332 and 333

Reported in : AIR1972Ker152

58, 61, 63 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Sections 142, 332 and 333 of Succession Act, 1925 - property in question attached and brought to sale in pursuance of decree obtained against one who was … 1963 in E. P. No. 309 of 1961 under Order 21, Rule 56. Civil P. C. in O. S. 6 of 1957 objecting to the … the estate as an association of persons overruling the plea that they should be assessed as trustees under Section 41 of the Indian Income-tax Act. 1922. In deciding the question their Lordships had to consider whether a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2009

Sarvjit Singh Sareen Vs. Mrs. Ritu Menon and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-2009

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 63, 87, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 118, 119, 120and 138; Evidence Act 1872 - Sections 68; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition Act - Sections 169; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 19 and 21; Hindu Law

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT242

proved by one of the attesting witness, Mr. Navneet Bansal in terms of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872. It is urged that the contents of the … 3 SCR 473, where the following observations of the Privy Council in Sarat Kumari Bibi v. Sakhi Chand 56 IA 62, were quoted and applied:the principle which requires the propounder to remove suspicions from the mind of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1997

Jugdish Chander Vs. Punjab National Bank

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-24-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 9; Successsion Act - Sections 213

Reported in : 1998RLR254

settled that it is not necessary to obtain letters of administration per Sections 211 and 212 of the Succession Act, 1925 and cases which are of relevance and as cited above may now be referred.(19) In Jogendra Chander V. … dated 2.1.69 of deft. Bank to the pff. which is Exhibited as PW4/25.(14) Reference is also made to Section 16 Limitation Act which reads : S.16. Effect of death of before the accrual of the right to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2007

Ashok Kumar Kapur and ors. Vs. Ashok Khanna and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-13-2007

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 11, 31, 33, 34, 45, 56, 77 and 83; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3(1); Trustees and Mortgagees Powers Act, 1866 - Sections 43; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 302; Charitable and Religious Trusts Act, 1920 - Sections 7; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Official Trustees Act, 1930 - Sections 10(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 90 - Order 1, Rule 8; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rules 14 and 88; Calcutta High Court Rules - Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 68 and 142

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC2091(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(2)CHN222; JT2007(4)SC362; 2007(4)SCALE265; (2007)5SCC189; [2007]75SCL193(SC); 2007AIRSCW1865; 2007(4)CivilLJ390; 2007(3)KCCR1666(SC).

Act and not otherwise. Similar provisions exist in the Official Trustees Act, 1930, Section 302 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 7 of the Charitable and Religious Trusts Act, 1920. The courts of India have all along … the respondent in the instant case that the instance case is squarely covered under the Illustration (b) of Section 56 of the Indian Trust Act and the trustees are bound to fulfil the purpose of the trust and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2014

Dhruv Dayal Gupta Vs. Hcl Infosolutions Ltd. and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-21-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

about 13th October, 1998 instituted the petition (from which FAO No.42/2011 arises) under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeking probate of the Will dated 22nd December, 1995 of Smt. Jwala Devi, pleading: (i) that Smt. Jwala

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2014

Dhruv Dayal Gupta and anr Vs. Satyawati Devi Aggarwal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-21-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

about 13th October, 1998 instituted the petition (from which FAO No.42/2011 arises) under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeking probate of the Will dated 22nd December, 1995 of Smt. Jwala Devi, pleading: (i) that Smt. Jwala

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial