Advanced Search Results

Anthappa (Deceased) by His Testamentary L.Rs Vs. Distinappa Alias Subb ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyConstitution

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 332 and 832; Indian Succession Rules; Hindu Law; Adaptations of Law Order, 1950; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 29(2) and 392; General Clauses Act - Sections 3, 4A and 24; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(1), 13(3), 14, 15 and 372

Reported in : AIR2006Kant60; ILR2006KAR1576; 2006(1)KarLJ270

in force and full effect in view of the provisions of Section 3(1) and 3(2) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925?2. Does the notification referred to immediately herein supra stand impliedly repealed by the provisions of Section 392 of

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997,

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997,

Babu Lal Grand Sons Family Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1989)31ITD52(Delhi)

and therefore, in view of Section 14 of the Transfer, of Property Act, 1908 and Section 114 of Succession Act, 1925, the tying-up of property beyond the minority of the persons to whom the Trust created belonged, was against … of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT v.Smt. Usha Agarwal Family Trust [1989] 176 ITR 392.7. We have carefully considered the rival submissions as also the decisions referred to above. No doubt as held

K.R. Rajalakshmi Devi (Deceased) by L.Rs Vs. K.R. Chandrasekhar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 59, 61, 63 and 289; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 67 and 68; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 45 and 47; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 1998(3)KarLJ634

circumstance by placing satisfactory evidence on record. The Supreme Court in the said decision held as follows: '(B) Succession Act (1925), Section 61 -- Will --Genuineness -- Proof -- Failure of plaintiff to remove suspicious circumstances by placing satisfactory material … as O.S. No. 419 of 1971, vide copy of the plaint at Ex. P-31 and P-32, O.S. No. 392 of 1971 also before the Munsiff, Chintamani vide copy of the plaint at Ex. P-33, O.S. No. 12

In Re: New Kaiser-i-hind Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd. (In Liquidation ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 13 and 23(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 391(2), 392, 392(1), 392(2), 393, 393(2), 397, 398, 402, 433, 434, 439, 441(2), 536 and 536(1)

Reported in : [1968]38CompCas701(Bom)

proper for both groups to apply for liquidation of company - proper to wind up company. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … company itself took out a judge's summons that the company be wound up under the provisions of section 392(2) of the Companies Act as the scheme could not be worked. This judge's summons is Company Application No.

In Re: Sakamari Steel and Alloys Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 390, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 391(6), 392, 393, 393(1), 394, 394A, 397, 398 and 643

Reported in : [1981]51CompCas266(Bom)

interest - such scheme is not workable - same conclusion follows for class of unsecured creditors. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … the court under ss. 391 to 394 - more particularly after the amendment of these provisions in 1965. Section 392 enjoins the court to supervise scheme and, therefore, it is all the more necessary to examine the bolts

In Re: Dena Bank Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956, Sections 39(1), 145, 391, 392(1), 394 and 394(1)

Reported in : [1976]46CompCas541(Bom)

holder's - said fact renders challenge on amalgamation for not being beneficial to company as unsustainable. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … put up before me for sanction will need to be modified in exercise of my powers under section 392(1)(b) of the Companies Act. It is true that the power of modification is usually exercised by the court

Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

per centum on such amount or value. page 242 of 531 certificate under Part X of the Indian succession Act 1925 (39 of 1925) or under the Regulation of the Bombay Code No.8 of 1827 in respect of any … Gram Panchayat of Village Jamalpur v. Malwinder Singh. The case arose in the context of direct conflict between Section 8(2) of the Central Act of 1950 and Section 3 of the Punjab Act of 1953 on the

Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi an ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

per centum on such amount or value. page 242 of 531 certificate under Part X of the Indian succession Act 1925 (39 of 1925) or under the Regulation of the Bombay Code No.8 of 1827 in respect of any … Gram Panchayat of Village Jamalpur v. Malwinder Singh. The case arose in the context of direct conflict between Section 8(2) of the Central Act of 1950 and Section 3 of the Punjab Act of 1953 on the