Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 386 · Page 1 of about 80 results (0.036 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 07 1949

Benares Hindu University Vs. Gauri Dutt Joshi

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-07-1949

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 232 and 236

Reported in : AIR1950All196

therefore, be entitled to a grant of letters of administration Under Section 232, Succession Act, unless debarred by Section 386 of the Act.7. Section 236 of the Act is as follows : 'Letters of administration cannot be granted … single Judge on the ground that the Benares Hindu University was an association of individuals and Section 236, Succession Act, therefore, was a bar to the grant of letters of administration to the Benares Hindu University. The learned … Judge dismissing an application Under Section 276 of Act, XXXIX [39] of 1925. One Ram Dutt Joshi died on llth of March 1943, leaving a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 1997

K.R. Rajalakshmi Devi (Deceased) by L.Rs Vs. K.R. Chandrasekhar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-12-1997

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 59, 61, 63 and 289; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 67 and 68; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 45 and 47; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 1998(3)KarLJ634

circumstance by placing satisfactory evidence on record. The Supreme Court in the said decision held as follows: '(B) Succession Act (1925), Section 61 -- Will --Genuineness -- Proof -- Failure of plaintiff to remove suspicious circumstances by placing satisfactory material … 390 of 1971 before the Court of Munsiff, Chintamani, copy of the plaint at Ex. P-48, O.S. No. 386 of 1971 also before the Court of Munsiff, Chintamani, copy of the plaint at Ex. P-51 and order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1957

Southern Bank Ltd. Vs. Kesardeo Ganeriwalla and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-01-1957

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Sucession Act, 1925 - Sections 263, 272 and 283; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104; ;High Court Original Side Rules - Rules 29 and 33; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1958Cal377,62CWN444

in our country in, making a grant is done in terms of the procedure laid down by the Succession Act, 1925, and when a grant is made by this Court, the rules on the matter on the Original Side … the right to the revocation of the probate. The grounds for revocation of probate are set out in Section 283 of the Succession Act of 1925 and it is well settled that that section is exhaustive: See … when all do not join in the application for probate (ibid p. 386). Certificates are statutory certificates proving death e.g. as issued under the Merchant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 24 1962

Ramaswamy Iyer Agnellus Lawrence Gopalan Vs. the Union of India and an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-24-1962

Subject : CriminalLimitation

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 68, 69, 70 and 409; Army Act - Sections 3, 69 and 174; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 386, 386(2) and 386(3) - Schedule - Rules 5, 10 and 11

Reported in : AIR1963Bom21; (1962)64BOMLR440; 1963CriLJ152; ILR1962Bom523

Army Act, is subject to the limitation imposed by Section 70 of the Indian Penal Code. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … Gopalan filed before the Magistrate an objection to the attachment under Rule 6 of the Rules framed under Section 386 of the Criminal Procedure Code. She claimed that she was the owner of the Life Insurance Polices, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1927

Paramanandachari Vs. M. Veerappan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-23-1927

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 107Ind.Cas.431

116 : A.I.R. 1926 Mad. 407 : 23 L.W. 7282. The learned Vakil for the respondent refers to Section 386 of the Succession Act of 1925 (Section 22 of Act VII of 1889) which shows that he need … J.1. Under the 1st part of Section 16 of the Succession Certificate Act (now Section 381 of the Succession Act of 1925) the certificate (Ex. B) is conclusive against the debtor [vide, Kuchur Iyer v. Vengu Ammal 93

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1927

Paramanandachary Vs. M. Veerappan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-23-1927

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1928Mad213a

[vide, Kuchu Iyer v. Vengu Ammal A.I.R. 1926 Mad. 407].2. The learned vakil for the respondent refers to Section 386, Succession Act of 1925 (S. 22 of Act 7 of 1889), which shows that he need not pay … Ramesam, J.1. Under the first part of Section 16, Succession Certificate Act (now Section 381, Succession Act of 1925), the certificate (Ex. B) is conclusive against the debtor [vide, Kuchu Iyer v. Vengu Ammal A.I.R.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2010

Hari Singh and anr. Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-03-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

due execution of the will and attestation of two attesting witnesses as required under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and they have not proved the same under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872" and that he … her or her daughters. The Widow of Late Kundan Singh died in 1966. On 15.3.1976, their FAO (OS) 386/1996 Page 3 of 63 daughter, Smt.Gurbaksh Kaur filed Objections against the grant of Probate sought by the Petitioners

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2003

In Re: the Goods of Late Ravinder Kumar

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-04-2003

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 225; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 9 and 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148 and 149; Sucession Act, 1925 - Sections 276 and 278

Reported in : AIR2004All46

Sri J. Nagar that the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure save as otherwise provided in the Indian Succession Act, 1925 have been made applicable to the proceedings in relation to the grant of probate and Letters of Administration.10. … Kailash Chandra case (supra), it was laid down as follows (at page 386 of the said AIR) :'..............It seems clear to us that the Court … the Court has power to enlarge the period for payment of Court-fee in view of the provisions of Section 148 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is further submitted by Sri J. Nagar that the provisions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2016

Adi Dara Patel and Others Vs. S. R. Jondhale and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-22-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Minocher so also Sorabji and a daughter Nagi. 111. Mr. Chidambaram's arguments overlook the scheme of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and its specific provisions relating to the role and power of executors. That Act consolidates the law applicable … law laid down in Prahlad Singh vs. Union of India((2011) 5 SCC 386), Sitaram Bhandar Society((2009) 10 SCC 501), P. K. Kalburqi((2005) 12 SCC 489)and … calling for the records, papers and proceedings pertaining to :- (i) The order dated 30th November, 2006 under section 8(4) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short the ULC Act ). (ii) The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2017

Manjula Banerjee vs.state and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-08-2017

Subject : Education

referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J.1. This first appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is filed by the sister and who was the respondent No.4 in the probate petition filed by respondent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial