Advanced Search Results

Assam Bengal Railway Co. Ltd. Vs. Atul Chandra Sen

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1937Cal314

certificate shall be granted in respect of assets for which a previous certificate has been obtained. Section 385, Succession Act, merely says that a certificate subsequently granted would be invalid under certain circumstances. Moreover the effect of Section … It follows that they are not entitled to the indemnity or protection afforded by Section 7, Provident Funds Act, 1925. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with costs. -

Dinabandhu Roy Brajaraj Saha, Firm Vs. Sarala Sundari Dassya W/O Haral ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR1940Cal296

has no 'interest in the estate of the deceased' within the meaning of Section 283 (1), Clause (c), Succession Act of 1925, (b) that assuming that such a creditor of the heir-at law has the right to present … Order J. has laid down the law correctly in Priyanath Bhattacharjee v. Sailabala Debi (1929) 16 A.I.R. Pat 385, when he said that Section 50, Probate and Administration Act, (Section 263, Succession Act) does not mean that

Harsh Vardhan Lodha and Others Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Right to Information

AIR 1933 Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun and ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas and ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held that - the position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of … Michael (3)] h) R. Mathalone and ors. vs. Bombay Life Assurance Co. Ltd. and ors. (AIR 1953 SC 385), On the point as to who can acquire new shares of a company. It was held - a

Harsh Vardhan Lodha and ors. Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

h) AIR 193.Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun & ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas & ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held thatthe position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of a receiver, … M. Michael (3)]. h) R. Mathalone & ors. vs. Bombay Life Assurance Co. Ltd. & ors. (AIR 195.SC 385), On the point as to who can acquire new shares of a company. It was held - a

Pioneer Dyeing House Ltd. Vs. Shanker Vishnu Marathe

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 153(2)

Reported in : [1967]37CompCas546(Bom); 1967MhLJ557

1 Cal. 127 and Bengal Bank Ltd. v. Suresh Chakravartty [1952] A.I.R. Cal. 133, referred to. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … will not attempt to forecast.' 20. In In re English, Scottish and Australian Chartered Bank (1893) 3 ch. 385, during the winding up proceedings of a chartered banking company, a scheme of reconstruction was proposed under which

State of M.P. Vs. Sheshrao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376(1), 376(2) and 506; Constitution of India - Article 136; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 384, 385, 385(2) and 386

Reported in : AIR2005SC4417; JT2005(12)SC425; (2005)8SCC11(1)

Adverse inference Non examination of party to suit Held, Adverse inference can be drawn against that party. INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 [C.A. No. 35/1925]. Section 63;] Proof of Will Suspicious circumstances - Will executed just two weeks prior to … appellate Court to dismiss an appeal summarily if it considers that there is no sufficient ground for interference. Section 385 Cr.P.C. gives the procedure for hearing appeals not dismissed summarily and Section 386 Cr.P.C. gives the powers of

Anthony Swamy Vs. Chowramma

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 295 and 299; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908; ;Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 - Sections 11(4) - Schedule - Articles 4 and 11(1)

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1294

letters of administration with the Will annexed purporting to have been filed under Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 ('the Act'), while it has to be regarded as a petition filed under Section 276 of the Act.

State of M.P. Vs. Dayanand Dohar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Schedule Caste/Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - Sections 3(1); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376, 376(1) and 376(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 384, 385 and 386; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2006SC754; JT2005(12)SC559; (2005)8SCC12(1)

Adverse inference Non examination of party to suit Held, Adverse inference can be drawn against that party. INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 [C.A. No. 35/1925]. Section 63;] Proof of Will Suspicious circumstances - Will executed just two weeks prior to … appellate Court to dismiss an appeal summarily if it considers that there is no sufficient ground for interference. Section 385 Cr.P.C. gives the procedure for hearing appeals not dismissed summarily and Section 386 Cr.P.C. gives the powers of

William Jacks and Co. (India) Ltd. Vs. Skipper Sales Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40, Rules 1 and 2; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 6; Constitution of India - Article 300A

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)357; 69(1997)DLT36

to Public Witness .I, he being her brother. He had obtained Probate under Section 289 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in the Court of Mr. N.C. Kochhar, District Judge, Delhi (as His Lordship then was) in Probate Case … (159) EX. P.4isallotmentletterdated9.11.1977 which refers to Flat No. 301,750 sq. ft. Third Floor. The rate mentioned is Rs. 385.00 per sq. ft. Ex. P.5 is the letter dated 31.1.1984 in and by which Mr. Baijit Singh Shah

Hindu Community in General and Citizens of Gobichettipalayam Senniappa ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act - Sections 108; ;Indian Trusts Act; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; ;Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 14 and 14(1); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80, 80(2), 92, 104(1) - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 39, Rule 1 - Order 40, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 27; ;Hindu law

Reported in : (2005)3MLJ149

the special requirement of attestation prescribed in the case of a Will by Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The onus to prove the Will is on the propounder and in the absence of suspicious circumstances surrounding … the file of Sub Court, Erode as well as additional statement filed by one Perumal in O.S. No. 385 of 1980 on the file of Sub Court, Gobi. He also referred to the evidence of the scribe,