Advanced Search Results

Gaudiya Mission Vs. Shobha Bose and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 384 and 384(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100, 101 and 141

Reported in : AIR2008SC1012; 2008(3)ALD10(SC); 2008(1)ALLMR(SC)909; 2008(2)ALT26(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(2)CHN26; JT2008(1)SC384; (2008)3MLJ506(SC); 2008(1)SCALE390; 2008AIRSCW564; AIR2008SC1012; 2008(2)CivilLJ464; 2008(1)LH(SC)463; 2008(2)ICC170; 2008(2)KCCRSN105

law could be raised. Gaudiya Mission vs Shobha Bose & anr. [CA No. 398/2008 DD 15.1.2008]. -- INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925. Section 384: [C.K. Thakker & Altamas Kabir, JJ] Scope of Appeal - Testamentary suit filed on original side filed on

Lokanath Bhoi Vs. Gaya Prasad Bhoi and Two ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; India Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 384 and 388; Orissa Civil Court's Act, 1984 - Sections 16, 18 and 20

Reported in : AIR2004Ori176; 98(2004)CLT328

Nos. 1 and 2 filed Misc. Succession Case No. 60 of 1994 under Section 383 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (in short, 'the Succession Act') for revocation of the succession certificate granted by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), … the provision in Section 16 of the Orissa Civil Courts Act, 1984 (in short, 'the Act, 1984') and Section 384 of the Succession Act; and(ii) the lower appellate Court committed material irregularity in recording the finding that petitioner

Abdul Karim and anr. Vs. Raheesa Ansari

Court : Kerala

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 373, 373(3), 384(1) and 388(2); Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 39

Reported in : AIR1986Ker183

disposal. 8. Learned counsel for the revision petitioners contended that the Appellate Court under Section 384 of the Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act') has no power to order remand that the Succession Court acting under Part IX

Amalorpava Mary and A. Arputha Josephine Vs. Kulandai Ammal,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 278, 287 and 384

Reported in : AIR2004Mad291; 2004(2)CTC502; (2004)1MLJ634

of Innasi Ammal, the appellants have filed the above appeal before this Court under Section 384 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.2. For convenience we may refer the parties as described in O.P. No. 278 of 87. In the matter

Shri Vitthal Ramchandra Mali Vs. Smt. Laxmi Ganpati Mali and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276, 365, 372, 384, 388, 388(1) and 388(2); Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28A and 28A(1); Indian Succession Act, 1865; Administration Act, 1881; Succession Certificate Act, 1889 - Sections 19(1), 26, 26(1) and 26(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 141 and 647

Reported in : AIR2006Bom298; 2006(4)ALLMR389; 2006(4)BomCR31

for grant of succession certificate. The question to be decided in these Appeals is whether the Appeal under Section 384 of the said Act of 1925 against the decision of the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division will lie … orders passed by the courts of Civil Judge, Senior Division on Application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act of 1925) for grant of succession certificate. The question to be

Rajrajeshwarashram Vs. Svarupanandtirtha

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1927Bom499; (1927)29BOMLR1031; 103Ind.Cas.637

of the Indian Succession Act 1925 provides that Section 383 (dealing with the revocation of a certificate) and Section 384 (dealing with appeals) are to apply to certificates granted under Regulation VIII of 1827.3. Now a preliminary point … construction of the Bombay Pleaders Act 1920, which is a Bombay Act, taken in connection with the Indian Succession Act 1925, which is an Imperial Act, and the General Clauses Act 1897, Section 8, which is another Imperial Act.

Smt. Yashoda Sambhaji Sawant Vs. Smt. Savitra Sambhaji Sawant

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Succession

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 373, 383, 370, 390, 384, 388; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, - section 115

by the Respondent in the Court of learned C.J.S.D. Satara under section 373 and 383 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Part 10 of the said Act containing Section 370 to 390 deal with succession certificate. Section 373 deals … application for grant of succession certificate. Section 383 provides for filing of an application to revoke succession certificate. Section 384 and 388 read thus :- "384. Appeal.-(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Part, an appeal shall

Kummuru Appala Swamy @ Sanjeeva Rao Vs. P.V. Prasada Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 384; Hindu Succession Act 1956 - Sections 15; Evidence Act - Sections 32

Reported in : 2007(5)ALD251; 2007(6)ALT233

District Judge, Vizianagaram, dated 21-1-2002 had preferred the present civil miscellaneous appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter in short referred to as 'Act' for the purpose of convenience).2. The appellant herein as petitioner filed

Mosamatt Parmeshwari Devi and anr. Vs. Geeta Devi and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 384 and 388(2)

be dismissed. It has been stated that the appeal has been filed under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and according to the provisions of Section 384, an appeal shall lie to the High Court. It has

Binod Sahu and anr. Vs. Smt. Chandrama Sahu and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 384

Reported in : AIR2003Ori11; 93(2002)CLT659; 2002(II)OLR62

A.S. Naidu, J.1. This is an appeal filed under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), inter alia, challenging the order passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division,