Advanced Search Results

Smt. Yashoda Sambhaji Sawant Vs. Smt. Savitra Sambhaji Sawant

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Succession

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 373, 383, 370, 390, 384, 388; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, - section 115

by the Respondent in the Court of learned C.J.S.D. Satara under section 373 and 383 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Part 10 of the said Act containing Section 370 to 390 deal with succession certificate. Section 373 deals

Rajrajeshwarashram Vs. Svarupanandtirtha

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1927Bom499; (1927)29BOMLR1031; 103Ind.Cas.637

payable amounting to Rs. 1,264. That is because Section 390 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 provides that Section 383 (dealing with the revocation of a certificate) and Section 384 (dealing with appeals) are to apply to certificates … construction of the Bombay Pleaders Act 1920, which is a Bombay Act, taken in connection with the Indian Succession Act 1925, which is an Imperial Act, and the General Clauses Act 1897, Section 8, which is another Imperial Act.

Smt. Jagat Nandini and anr. Vs. Inder Pal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 39 and 44(2); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372

Reported in : [1986]60CompCas272(All)

Succession certificate was granted in favour of the applicant on December 23, 1976. The respondent applied thereafter under Section 383 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, for revocation of the succession certificate. This application of the respondent has … daughters. On or about August 1, 1975, an application for succession certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, was made by Smt. Jagat Nandini, appellant No. 1, for herself and as guardian for appellant No. 2

Smt. Budhwant Kaur Vs. Rawat Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 370, 372, 373 and 383; Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1977 - Rule 14

Reported in : AIR1988Raj1; 1987(1)WLN253

Inder Sen Israni, J.1. This is a Civil Misc. Appeal under Section 384 of the Succession Act, 1925 against the judgment dated 26-4-1985 passed by the District Judge, Jhalawar in Civil Misc. Case No. 11/82, whereby … the learned District Judge, the same court could not cancel the order except by invoking the provisions of Section 383 of the Act. It is evident from the perusal of order dated 26-4-1985 that the order revoking the

Lokanath Bhoi Vs. Gaya Prasad Bhoi and Two ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; India Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 384 and 388; Orissa Civil Court's Act, 1984 - Sections 16, 18 and 20

Reported in : AIR2004Ori176; 98(2004)CLT328

Nos. 1 and 2 filed Misc. Succession Case No. 60 of 1994 under Section 383 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (in short, 'the Succession Act') for revocation of the succession certificate granted by the Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Beersing Charan Karosiya and Others Vs. Tanhabai Pratap Karosiya and O ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

Nos.1 and 2 to challenge the decision of application which was filed under section 383 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). In the application bearing Civil Misc. Application No.81/2008 the present respondent Nos.1

Brij Bihari Mishra and Others Vs. Vijai Shanker Mishra and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 383 and 384

Reported in : AIR1991All236

dismissed with costs.17. Appeal dismissed. Family - succession certificate - Sections 383(b), ( c ) and 384 of Succession Act, 1925 - revocation - can be claimed either on the ground being obtained fraudulently by making of a false … 'd' and V are not attracted in the instant case. He relies mainly on cl. (b) of the Section for the maintainability of the application. The aforesaid provision is as under:'That certificate was obtained fraudulently by making

Gajen Talukdar and ors. Vs. Smt. Dipamoni Das

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372 and 383

challenged in this appeal on the sole ground that the learned Judge misconstrued Section 383 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short, the 'Act') and revoked the Succession Certificate duly granted to the appellant contrary to the provisions

M. Suresh Vs. Mrs. B. Sumathi and

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyService

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 212, 213, 264(1), 264(2), 266, 300, 370 to 372, 372(1), 372(3), 380, 383 and 384; Succession Certificate Act, 1889; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1929 - Sections 2; General Clauses Act; Probate and Administration Act - Sections 87; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 141; Original Side Rules - Order 25, Rule 6

Reported in : AIR2008Mad18; 2007(5)CTC330; (2007)5MLJ1388

the maintainability of the petition was doubted on the ground that as per Section 371 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short, the 'Act'), the District Judge within whose jurisdiction the deceased ordinarily resided at the time of … by the District Judge may be also revoked by the District Judge in view of the provisions of Section 383 of the Act. In terms of Section 384, an appeal shall lie to the High Court from an

Jagdish D. Mehta Vs. Suneel Anant Deshpande

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63(1), 268, 276, 280, 283(1), 284, 295, 300 and 383; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 26, 86 and 87B - Order 22, Rule 4; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rules 374, 397, 397(4), 399, 400, 401, 402 and 403

Reported in : 2008(5)BomCR56

the parties at considerable length and with their assistance have gone through the relevant provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 ('the Act' for short) and the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules ('the Rules' for short) so also … in newspaper as the Prothonotary and Senior Master may direct. A bare perusal of these provisions read with Section 383 of the Act clearly cast duty on the Prothonotary and Senior Master to take necessary steps for service