Advanced Search Results

ishwarsingh S/O Chunnusingh and ors. Vs. Krishnabai W/O Chunnusingh an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 196, 197 and 205; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 29(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 1995(3)BomCR156; (1995)97BOMLR200

section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable to a proceeding instituted under Chapter VII of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.2. Ishwarsingh Chunnusingh and five others submitted an application purporting to be under sections 192 and 195 of the … Supreme Court considered the provisions of section 470(4) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (identical with sub-section (5) of section 378 of 1973 Code). Though the section started with a mandate that no application shall be entertained after the

J.D. Shanthi (deceased) and Others Vs. M.L. Perumal and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

plaintiffs are further directed to render true and correct accounts once in a year. (vi). No costs. Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 232, Section 276 Genuineness of will Letters of Administration Whether petitioners are entitled to grant Letters of Administration … judgments of this Court reported in 2001 (3) CTC 283 (CORRA VEDACHALAM CHETTY V. G.JANAKIRAMAN); 1999 (3) CTC 378 (R.VASANTHI V. JANAKI DEVI) and (2008) 8 MLJ 647 (THAYAMMAL V. PONNUSAMY). 10. Per contra, it is the

Sugumal Duraisingh Vs. Annamani Ammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 32, 47 and 63; Indian Registration Act, 1908; ; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956; Hindu Law

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ591

to look into Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and also Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 reads as follows;Proof of execution of document required by law to … said circumstances, he has been totally debarred from questioning the validity of Ex.P2.g) In : 1999 (III) CTC 378 R. Vasanthi v. Janaki Devi and Ors. this Court has held that the registration of a Will may

Moni Dei Vs. Hadibandhu Patra and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4 and 5

Reported in : AIR1955Ori73; 21(1955)CLT116

of the grant applicable thereto, descends to a single heir, or to any property, to which the Indian Succession Act, 1925 applies.4. Nothing in this Act shall apply to the property of any Hindu dying intestate before the commencement … majority decision in -- 'Badhi Bewa v. Bhagawan Sahu', AIR 1951 Orissa 378 (SB) (A), according to which Section 3(2) of the Act is retrospective … Division Bench. The question referred to us for our opinion is formulated as follows :'Whether the provisions of Section 3(2), Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 18 of 1937 as amended by Act, 11 of 1938 are

V.M. Raghavalu Naidu and Sons by Executors, C.G. Krishnaswami Naidu an ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 3, 10, 41 and 41(1)

Reported in : AIR1950Mad790; [1950]18ITR787(Mad); (1950)IIMLJ300

and when the executors of a will have become trustees and the legatees have become beneficiaries.18. Chapter 7, Succession Act, 1925, succinctly defines the duties of executors. Shortly stated it is their duty to clear the estate to pay … v. Mrs. Saldana, 55 Mad. 891 : A. I. R. 1932 Mad 378 which follows the decision of the Lahore High Court in Hots Trust … Satyanarayana Rao, J.1. This is a consolidated reference under Section 66(1), Income tax Act, by the Appellate Tribunal relating to the relevant assessment years 1942-1943 and 1948-1944; and

Emperor Vs. Ganpat Krishnaji Parit

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1930Bom167; (1930)32BOMLR351

18 All. 88 and Queen-Empress v. Sri Churn Chungo (1895) I.L.R. 22 Cal. 1017, F.B., followed. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … with the intention of coercing him to pay his debt commits the offence of theft as defined in section 378 of the Penal Code.3. The opinion of the trial Magistrate, therefore, that though the accused was guilty of

S. Kanthimathy, S. Lakshmi, S. Vs. the Woodlands Estates Limited and

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)144CompCas830

which may be condoned by invoking the provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act. 5.9 The Indian Succession Act, 1925 does not confer executive jurisdiction on civil courts to interpret any Will, but only in respect of probate

Vishwa Nath and anr. Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 34, 35, 40 and 40A; Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Rules, 1901 - Rule A378(B); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3141

case (supra). Bala Prasad's case (supra), Smt. Pitmo's case (supra) and Awadeshs case (supra) were all on Indian Succession Act, 1925, with regard to registered Will. There is no dispute with regard to principles laid down for proof of … Officer, Ballia and the order dated 13th November, 1997 passed by Naib Tahsildar, City, Ballia in proceedings under Section 34 of U. P. Land Revenue Act, 1901.3. Brief facts giving rise to this writ petition are ;

Priyamvada Devi Birla, Rajendra Singh Lodha Vs. Laxmi Devi Newar and a ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 211; ;Estate Duty Act - Sections 20 and 37; ;Estate Duty (Controlled Companies) Rules, 1953 - Rule 15; ;Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 30; ;Companies Act - Sections 255, 291 and 292

Reported in : 2005(4)CHN544

or for passing order of injunction. He has drawn my attention to the Section 211 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and submits that all the properties under the law on death of testatrix vest unto the executor. Under … his submission he has relied on a passage from a textbook of Mortimer on Probate (2nd Edn.) page 378, William Mortimer and Snmucks of Executors Administrators and Probate (16th Edn.) page 268.28. Mr. Mukherjee, Mr. Pal and

Rupali Mehta Vs. Smt. Tina Narinder SaIn Mehta

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 192, 193, 194, 195, 208, 209, 217, 247, 268, 269 and 269(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 141 - Order 21 Rule 63 - Order 39

Reported in : AIR2007Bom62; 2006(6)ALLMR48; 2006(6)BomCR778; 2006(6)MhLj786

Birla v. Laxmi Devi Newar and Anr. : 2005(4)CHN544 . 5. Perusal of the preamble of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 shows that the Act has been enacted to consolidate the law applicable to intestate and testamentary succession. The … for both sides in detail on this question. According to the Plaintiff, in terms of the provisions of Section 268 of the Indian Succession Act to the proceedings for grant of probate and letters of administration, the … out by the Plaintiff in Suit No. 75 of 2005. Petition No. 378 of 2005 has been filed by the present Plaintiff Rupali Mehta praying