Advanced Search Results

Madhuri Pukharaj Baldota Vs. Omkarlal Daulatram Banwat and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

SCC 369; Srideviand Ors. v Jayaraja Shetty, (2005) 2 SCC 784; PentakotaSatyanarayana, supra). 20. Section 63 of the Succession Act, 1925 sets out the requirements for the valid execution of a will. A testator must sign it, or affix

Premakumari.R. vs O.K.Sivasankara Pillai

Court : Kerala

Additional District Court, Ernakulam, in O.S.No.27 of 2011. The proceedings were initiated under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act 1925. The defendants resisted the original petition denying the execution of the Will, and thus, the proceedings were converted … situation or is not expected of a normal person.21. In Jaswant Kaur v. Amrit Kaur [(1977) 1 SCC 369], the Supreme Court enunciated the principles for dealing with a Will shrouded in suspicion. The Supreme Court observed

Ravindra Nath Agrawal Vs. Yogender Nath Agrawal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Will dated 06.04.2011 annexed thereto, under Section 276 read with Sections 250 and 273(b) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Upon receipt of summons in the said testamentary case, the daughter Lily Nath 5 came up with the … 191 of the Act are included in this Part.26. Part IX of the Act contains Sections 217 to 369, divided into 13 chapters. Chapter IV of Part IX contains provisions governing “the practice in granting and revoking

Preman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 118; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 25 and 26

Reported in : AIR1999Ker93

of 1996. The petitioners in both the Original Petitions are Christians. Aggrieved against Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, they have filed the Original Petitions to declare the said provision as unconstitutional, discriminatory, arbitrary and violative of … following provisions of the Act, namely. Sections 5 - 49, 58 - 191, 212, 213 and 215 - 369, the members of any race, sect ortribe in the State, or of any part of such race, sect

Tincowri Pramanik Vs. Narayan Chandra Mukherjee and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Section 307 and 307(2)

Reported in : AIR1957Cal364

It is now well settled that the powers of the executors in India as provided in Section 307, Succession Act, 1925 (corresponding to Section 269, Succession Act, 1896 (Act X of 1896) ) are, at least, as extensive as … Bom 342 (A), Maneklal v. Keshav, AIR 1938 Bom 71 (B), Nistarini Dassi v. Nundolal Bose, 30 Cal 369 (C), there may be circumstances disclosed inthe will itself from which the Court may ascertain whether the testator

Ka Riverretta Diengdoh Vs. Ka Trially Sara Rymbai and Another

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. This appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (in short the 1925 Act), is directed against the judgment and order dated 22-9-2008 passed by the learned … sub-section (2) thereof, Sections 301 to 306, Sections 308 to 312, Sections 317 to 319, Sections 368 and 369.(2) The term “estate” or “property” wherever occurring in any of the Sections mentioned in column (1) shall be

Talla Palli Kasi Visalakshmi Vs. Tallapalli Venkata Vijayalakshmi and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 300

Reported in : AIR2004AP160; 2004(1)ALD569

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed by the sole appellant, against respondents-1 and 2, under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 questioning the, validity and legality of certain parts of the adjudications made by, and set forth in para … dated 5.6.2000, of the Court of the II Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, (Enquiry Court) made in S.O.P. No. 369 of 1995 of its file and the Decree of even date that followed the same therein.3. Perused the

Solomon and ors. Vs. Muthiah and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1974)1MLJ53

III of 1951), which came into force on 1st April, 1951. it was the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 that applied to the succession to the property of Swaminathan which opened on his death on 29th May, … Sections 5 to 49, 58 to 191, 212, 213 and 215 to 369, the members of any race, sect or tribe, to whom the State … Muthammal did not have an absolute interest in the immovable properties inherited from her husband Swaminathan, but under Section 17 of the said Regulation, she was entitled to an absolute right in respect of the movables and

Shirish Popatlal Shah Vs. Arun Popatlal Shah

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

A Will is proved if it meets the requirements of Sections 59, 61 and 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 59 says that a Will can be validly made by any adult of sound mind. The testamentary or … the judicial conscience that there is nothing untoward (Smt. Jaswant Kaur v Smt. Amit Kaur, (1977) 1 SCC 369).When more than one such circumstance exists, the cumulative effect must be Considered (S.R Srinivasa Rao and Ors. v

Hazari and ors. Vs. Neki and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 - Sections 14 and 15(1); Punjab Pre-emption (Amendment) Act, 1960 - Sections 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rules 1, 10 and 11; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306

Reported in : AIR1968SC1205; (1968)70PLR823; [1968]2SCR833

1960, Order 22 Rules 1, 10 and 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 306 of Succession Act, 1925 - appellant contended legal representatives not entitled to decree for pre-emption as right of pre-emption was personal right … should deposit the amount of Rs. 3,500/- in court on or before 15-1-1963. In suit Nos. 368 and 369 of 1961 the condition was that the plaintiffs should make the deposit of Rs. 5,000/- and Rs. 7,000/-