Advanced Search Results

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … provisions of the General Clauses Act, 1897, as adapted by the Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950. Under Art. 367(1) of the Constitution, unless the context otherwise requires, the General Clauses Act, 1897, shall subject to any adaptations

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … provisions of the General Clauses Act, 1897, as adapted by the Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950. Under Art. 367(1) of the Constitution, unless the context otherwise requires, the General Clauses Act, 1897, shall subject to any adaptations

Maheswar Pramanick and ors. Vs. Chabirani Sadhukhan and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

not entitled to any decree in view of the provisions of Sections 211 and 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Reliance was placed on All India Reporter 2004 Supreme Court page 2060 (Commissioner, Jalandhar Division & Ors.v.Mohan Krishan … Act, 1872 reliance was placed on 1996 Volume 8 Supreme Court Cases 367 (Tarlok Singh v. Vijay Kumar Sabharwal).Relying on the Income Tax notices it … of such notice. The defendants were estopped from challenging the title of the plaintiffs. It was contended that, section 115 of the Evidence Act, 1872 was attracted. A mere decree or order of eviction by itself could

N. Renuka Devi Vs. E. Lalitha and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

out of the above said decisions, it is necessary to take notice of the relevant provisions in the Succession Act, 1925. Section 266 of the Act provides that the District Judge shall have, in relation to the granting of Probate

Mathuradas Vassanji Vs. Raimal Hirji

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyFamily

Reported in : AIR1935Bom385; (1935)37BOMLR642; 159Ind.Cas.533

pay the claims of all creditors in full, the executor is bound, under Section 323 of the Indian Succession, Act, 1925, to pay them equally and rateably so far as the estate of the deceased, permits. It is not

Shri Jagdish Khandewal and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276, 278 and 290

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)129; 91(2001)DLT546; 2001(58)DRJ675

the petitioner, is of no relevance. The petitioner obtained Letters of Administration as per the procedure prescribed under Succession Act, 1925. The Letters of Adm. in the form prescribed u/S 290 of the said Act were granted on 7.5.79 … of Administration under Indian Succession Act and on 1.5.96 the District Judge, Delhi granted Letters of Administration under Section 276 and 278 of the Indian Succession Act. It seems that later on some applications were filed by … Mrs. Vijaya Gursahaney vs. DDA & Ors. 1994 Rajdhani Law Reporter (DB) 367 has held:-It is not disputed, and nay it could be disputed, that

Kotni R.N. Subudhi Vs. V.R.L. Murthy Raju

Court : Orissa

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63

Reported in : AIR1961Ori180

Will just two days prior to her death. The respondent filed an application u/s. 278 of the Indian Succession Act in the Court of the District Judge, Ganjam to prove the Will and to obtain necessary Letters of … Sinha relied upon the authority of a case in Sarkar Barnard and Co. v. Alak Manjari Kueri, AIR 1925 P. C. 89. That was a case of mortgage deed and their Lordships have held that where a … to constitute a valid Will and the formalities required for the same. Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act provides as follows:'63. Every testator, not

U.J.S. Chopra Vs. State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act - Sections 66; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 203, 271(2), 272, 280, 338, 366, 367, 369, 407, 417, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 423(2), 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 432, 435, 438, 439, 439(1), 439(2), 439(5), 439(6), 440, 442 and 469(1)

Reported in : AIR1955SC633; (1956)58BOMLR831; 1955CriLJ1410; [1955]2SCR94

accused after hearing the advocate (see In re Saiyed, Anif Sahib A.I.R. 1925 Mad. 993, Emperor v. Sher Singh I.L.R. [1927] Lah. 521, Crown v. … section in this chapter refers to 'The Judgment in every trial in any Criminal Court of original jurisdiction.' Section 367 provides what must be contained in 'every such judgment,' that is to say judgment in an original trial. … cause against his conviction although any attempt to set aside his conviction would not have much chance of success. For reasons to be stated hereafter I would rather say that in such a situation no application for … Court, Bombay, of an offence under section 66(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act (Act XXV of 1949) and sentenced to undergo imprisonment till the rising

Smt. Radhika Kapur vs.state and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER This petition invoking the provisions of Section 278 and 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 prays for grant of letters of administration and / or succession certificate respecting Will dated 14.11.2013 of late

Commissioner of Gift-tax, Bombay City-i Vs. Jer Mavis Lubimoff

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 3 and 4(1)

Reported in : [1978]114ITR90(Bom)

clear if regard be had to the provisions in the statutes. The Explanation to section 69 of the Succession Act, 1925, provides that where a man is invested with power to determine the disposition of property which he is … correct meaning of that expression is also evident from Halsbury's Laws of England, volume 30, 3rd edition, paragraph 367, wherein it is, inter alia, stated that dispositive powers, more commonly known as powers of appointment, are powers