Advanced Search Results

Jagdish Chandra Trikha Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CompanyFamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 211; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 9; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 148; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 2

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)753; AIR1998Delhi266; 4(1996)CLT513; [2000]100CompCas839(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT874

necessary to obtain letters of administration in terms of the provisions of Sections 211 and 212 of the Succession Act, 1925 and cases which are of relevance and as cited above may now be referred.(19) In Jogendra Chunder Dutt … basis thereof.The question of supplying a copy of the indemnity bond,therefore, does not arise.Sd/-MANAGER'Reference is also made to Section 16 of the Limitation Act which reads as follows:'16. Effect of death on or before the accrual of

Anand Versha & Anr vs Narender Kumar Sharma (Deceased) Thr Lrs &am ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

making the will, by operation of law, the will stands revoked. (See Sections 69 and 70 of the Succession Act, 1925.) Registration of a will does not make it any more effective.Conclusionxxx xxx xxx24. We therefore reiterate that immovable … judgment in Lalitaben Jayantilal Popat v. Pragnaben Jamnadas Kataria [(2008) 15 SCC 365]. xxx xxx xxx‖ (Emphasis Supplied)42. Similarly, holding that the person propounding the … estoppel is applicable. 7.8 Respondent no. 1‟s deliberate abstention from the witness stand attracts an adverse inference under Section 114(g) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (“Evidence Act”)/ Section 119(g) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (“BSA”),

Shri Vitthal Ramchandra Mali Vs. Smt. Laxmi Ganpati Mali and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276, 365, 372, 384, 388, 388(1) and 388(2); Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 28A and 28A(1); Indian Succession Act, 1865; Administration Act, 1881; Succession Certificate Act, 1889 - Sections 19(1), 26, 26(1) and 26(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 141 and 647

Reported in : AIR2006Bom298; 2006(4)ALLMR389; 2006(4)BomCR31

orders passed by the courts of Civil Judge, Senior Division on Application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act of 1925) for grant of succession certificate. The question to be

Smt. Bhagwati Bai and anr. Vs. Bablu @ Mukund and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2007ACJ682; AIR2007MP38; [2007(2)JCR115(MP)]; 2006(4)MPLJ5

the Division Bench has held on the basis of the principle contained in Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, that on the death of the claimant who had suffered the personal injury in the accident, the legal … judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Umedchand Golcha v. Dayaram and Ors. 2001 (1) JLJ 365, in which the Division Bench has held on the basis of the principle contained in Section 306 of

Siba Gogoi Vs. Haren Gogoi and Another

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Land Acquisition

will must be proved having regard to the provisions contained in clause (c) of Section 63 of the Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872, in terms whereof the propounder of a will must prove … 5. AIR 2009 SC 1389 (Lalitaben Jayantilal Popat Vs. Pragnaben Jamnadas Kataria and ors.). 6. (2008) 15 SCC 365 ( Lalitaben Jayantilal Popal Vs. Pragnaben Jamnadas Kataria and others). [10] Refuting the said argument, advanced by the

Surinder Pal Vs. Harish Kumar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 42, 43 and 44; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2

Reported in : (2003)133PLR567

his book No. 3 and thereafter the Registrar shall redeposit the original Will. Section 2 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 defines 'Condicil', to mean an instrument made in relation to a Will and explaining, altering or adding to … collected as rent of the said shops occupied by defendant No. 6 and for the recovery of Rs. 365/- which had been collected by defendants 1 and 2 from defendant No. 7. It was alleged that Nathu

Chandra Kumar and Others Vs. Aswani Kumar and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

such suspicious and unnatural circumstances, which makes it invalid and not genuine? 14. Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short `the Act of 1925') lays down the mode and manner of execution of an unprivileged Will. … Ram Singh, (2008) 14 SCC 754, Lalitaben Jayantilal Popat v. Pragnaben Jamnadas Kataria and others, (2008) 15 SCC 365, would submit: the will is shrouded by following unnatural and suspicious circumstances: i) as per propounder Triveni Bai

S. Narayanaswa Vs. Nimmala Appanna, S/O.Peddanna, and 5 Oth

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Will is required to be proved in terms of the provision of Section 63 (c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. One of the principal requirements for proving execution of

Kaur Singh Gajjan Singh Vs. Jaggar Singh Kehar Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Customary Law; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 14 and 30; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15 and 15(3)

Reported in : AIR1961P& H489

which is capable ot being so disposed ot by him in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, or any other law for the time being in force and applicable to Hindus.Explanation.-- The interest of a … proper to set out the relevant provisions of the Hindu Succession Act hereinafter called the Act. These are Sections 2, 4, 6 and 30, and are as follows:'2. (1) this Act applies--(a) to any person, who is … of any Scheduled Tribe within the meaning of Clause (25) of Article 365 of the Constitution unless the Central Government, by notification in the Official

Sh. Suraj Prakash Singh Vs. Smt. Kamlesh Prakash and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 12 Rule 6

application attested by only one witness, it did not fulfil the mandatory requirement of Section 63(C) of Indian Succession Act, 1925. The decision of the Trial Court was upheld by this Court. In the case before this Court, a … particular form of attestation shall be necessary.7. In Lalitaben Jayantilal Popat vs. Pragnaben Jamnadas Kataria (2008) 15 SCC 365 and Janki Narayan Bhoir vs. Narayan Namdeo Kadam (2003) 2 SCC 91, Supreme Court held that the requirement