Advanced Search Results

In Re, Smt. Amina

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionFamily

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 13, 14, 17, 19(1), 363, 366(22), 368 and 372; Guardian and Wards Act, 1890; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 51; Government of India Act, 1935; Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1908 - Sections 384 - Order 21, Rule 15(1)

Reported in : AIR1992Bom214

petition keeping in substance the questions formulated in this order of reference open.3. Section 51 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 reads as under:--'51. Division of a male intestate's property among his widow, children and parents.--(1) Subject to the … express any opinion that Article 366(22) was a provision relating to a covenant within the meaning of Article 363. In that case the petitioner who was not recognised as a Ruler by the President abandoned at the

Jitendra singh rajendra Singh kushwaha and Others Vs. Suresh Rajendra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

the Administrative Committee of Hon ble Judges for a suitable amendment to the Rules and the Form. Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 63(c) Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Section 114 Validity of Will Legality of execution Whether last Will and testament … him from her Will. Similarly, in Naresh Charan Das Gupta v Paresh Charan Dad Gupta, (AIR 1955 SC 363)the testator practically disinherited his son, and recorded in his will that he was doing so because his son

K.S. Sathyanarayanan Vs. D. Yasodha and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

is dismissed. However, considering the relationship between the parties, there shall be no order as to costs. Indian Succession Act,1925 - Section 222, Section 276 Limitation Act Article 137 Claim for probate Period of limitation Whether claim for … on the Judgment of the High Court of Calcutta reported in (1955) 1 SCR 1035: AIR 1955 SC 363 (NARESH CHARAN DAS GUPTA v. PARESH CHARAN DAS GUPTA); the Division Bench judgment of this Court reported in

Mst. Saroj Bai Vs. Hariram and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1987MP143

of facts did not arise in . those cases as well. What I find rather in Manikbai, AIR 1925 Bom 363 is indeed interesting and destroys the contention pressed by Shri Arun Mishra. Their Lordships agreed with … Bindraban's share in the agricultural land which the two brothers owned and possessed took place not under Hindu Succession Act or pre-existing Hindu Law but under Kanoon Mal Gwalior.5. On the facts aforesaid the legal consequence of Sarjo … her husband Bindraban on his death by virtue of the provisions of Section 253 of Kanoon Mal Gwalior, then applicable to cases of succession to

Mary Assumption Trinidade Etc. Vs. Vincent Manuel Trinidade and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 5(2); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2 and 273; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(28)

Reported in : ILR1976Delhi95

effect of the aforesaid conclusion, it was held, negativing the contention of the respondents herein that the Indian Succession Act, 1925 did not then extend to Goa that on the annexation of Goa, the Succession Act was automatically extended … marked either to the elder son, who had been disinherited, or to his wife.(3) By a petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, the younger son, respondent No. 1, sought from the District JudgeLetters of … Sailendra Krishna Ray, Air 1949 Patna 318(3) ; ., Air 1936 Bombay 363(4) and in the matter of G. A. Kuppuswami Nayagar; Air 1930 Madras

Darjus Jehangir Vs. Lyla Minoo Ghasvalla and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Successions Act, 1925 - Sections 74, 75, 82, 83, 88, 119, 120, 131 and 132; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR2000Bom372; 2000(2)ALLMR32; 2000(3)BomCR447; (2000)2BOMLR108

Mr. Bookwala had relied upon sections 74, 75, 82, 88, 119, 120, 131 and 132 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Mr. Bookwala has relied on the decisions in the cases of (i) Re. Rowland & another 1963 CD … been made to respondent No. 1 and conditional in some of the others. Mr. Bookwala had relied upon sections 74, 75, 82, 88, 119, 120, 131 and 132 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Mr. Bookwala has

Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Another Vs. Ashok Jagjivan Gokal and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

as executors and/or trustees. 48. On conjoint reading of Sections 323, 333, 363, 358 and 369 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 it is clear … respondent Nos.1 and 2. Learned counsel placed reliance on Sections 192, 193, 301, 317 and 318 of Indian Succession Act 1925 in support of his submission that respondent Nos.1 and 2 who have acted contrary to the interest of … already having been filed by the petitioners against the first respondent. Mr Andhyarujina, learned counsel submits that under Section 317 of the Indian Succession Act, it is duty of the Executor to submit Inventory within six months

Manilal Sunderji Doshi Vs. Kamal Manilal Doshi and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

and a further conception that the testator had testamantary capacity as required under Section 59 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to execute the will. The Court may, therefore, presume the execution and attestation (See SaratChandra Mondal Vs. Panchanan … subject in India was the case of NareshCharan Das Gupta Vs. Paresh Charan Das Gupta AIR 1955 SC 363 followed in Desh raj Gupta Vs. State 2010 (119) D.R.J. 138 DB. That was the usual case of

Yogesh Duggal and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276, 278; Limitation Act - Article 137

Briefly stating the facts of the case are; the appellants filed a petition under Section 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 in November, 1994 for grant of probate of a Will dated 12.08.1971 of their mother Late Smt. Puran … Kumar Banerjee Vs Subbodh Kumar Banerjee, AIR 1964 SC 8076. Naresh Charan Vs Paresh Charan, AIR 1955 SC 3637. Prithwis Kumar Mitra Vs Bibhuti Bhushan Mitra, (1966) ILR Calcutta 408(DB)8. Sher Muhammad Khan & Ors Vs Depurt

The State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Lord Nothbook and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

immovable properties of Sh. Raja Sardar Singh. First one was the application under Section 195 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and the application under Section 192 for the appointment of the Curator before the District Court at Jaipur. … State Explanation In the article, the expressions Ruler and Indian State have the same meanings as in Article 363” 22. Article 296 does not leave any discretion for determination of what might constitute escheat or bona vacantia.