Advanced Search Results

Radheshyam Basak Vs. Santosh Kumar Basak and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 265, 372 and 388(1); ;Calcutta (West Bengal) Civil Rules, 1935 - Rule 317(1); ;Calcutta (West Bengal) Civil Order, 1935; ;Calcutta High Court (Appellate Side) Rules - Rules 7 and 9; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1977Cal17

of 24-Parganas have been invested with the functions of the District Judge under Section 388(1) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 within the local limits of Sadar Munsif of Alipore under the Government of West Bengal Judicial Department Notification … in support of his contention. The first case referred to has been reported in ILR (1940) 1 Cal 358, (Jhirighat Native Tea Co. Ltd. v. Bipul Chandra Gupta). In this case it has been held that 'If

Sewdayal Ramjeedas Vs. Official Trustee of Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : AIR1931Cal651

this may be, I think it right to draw attention to the language of Illus. (v), Section 119, Succession Act, 1925 (the vesting sections):(v) A bequeaths the whole of his property to B upon trust to pay certain debts … more than this: it re-affirmed the familial-decision in the Land Mortgage Bank v. Sudurudeen Ahmed [1892] 19 Cal. 358 to the effect that a vendor's suit for the specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property

Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. versus Suresh Chand and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]9S.C.R.339

u/s.53A of TP Act, which deals with Part Performance. Headnotes† Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - s.54 - Succession Act, 1925 - s.63 - Evidence Act, 1872 - s.68 - Respondent no.1/plaintiff filed suit no. 613/1997 for possession, mesne … of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in RFA No. 358 of 2000 Appearances for Parties Advs. for the Appellant: S. Mahendran. Advs. … possession of the defendant No.1. • That the Will has not been proved in accordance with law. • Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act is not attracted if the possession of the property is not

Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Another Vs. Ashok Jagjivan Gokal and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

executors and/or trustees. 48. On conjoint reading of Sections 323, 333, 363, 358 and 369 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 it is clear that … respondent Nos.1 and 2. Learned counsel placed reliance on Sections 192, 193, 301, 317 and 318 of Indian Succession Act 1925 in support of his submission that respondent Nos.1 and 2 who have acted contrary to the interest of … already having been filed by the petitioners against the first respondent. Mr Andhyarujina, learned counsel submits that under Section 317 of the Indian Succession Act, it is duty of the Executor to submit Inventory within six months

Mr. Mh Rajbarbhuiya Vs. Mr. Am Mazumdar.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : divorce

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 384

1. Challenge in this appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is made against the judgment and order dated 4. 3. 2002 passed by the learned District Judge, Hailakandi, … of divorce of the second wife by the deceased. Moreover, in the case reported in (1981) 1 GLR 358 (Jiauddin Ahmed v. Anwara Begum) this court observed that though marriage under the Muslim law is only a

Jai Prakash vs.sub- Registrar Iv-A & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

making the will, by operation of law, the will stands revoked. (see Sections 69 and 70 of Indian Succession Act, 1925). Registration of a will does not make it any more effective.16. We therefore reiterate that immovable property can … To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning

Mussit. Rebun Nessa (2nd Wife), W/O Late Intaj Ali Laskar, Vs. Mussit. ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Right to Information

1. Challenge in this appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is made against the judgment and order dated 4.3.2002 passed by the learned District Judge, Hailakandi, in Misc.(Succession) … of divorce of the second wife by the deceased. Moreover, in the case reported in (1981) 1 GLR 358 (Jiauddin Ahmed v. Anwara Begum) this court observed that though marriage under the Muslim law is only a

Prabhakar S/O Chinappa Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 8 and 29(3); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57 and 213(2)

Reported in : 2004(4)MhLj886

Shri Bhangde further submitted that in view of the provisions ofSection 213 read with Section 57 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Succession Act'), when a right as executor or legatee is to be established … Court in the case of Vimalabai Govind Juverkar vs. State of Maharashtra and others reported in 1976 Mh.LJ. 358. Shri Bhangde further submitted that in view of the provisions ofSection 213 read with Section 57 of Indian

G.P. Sharma Vs. Hari Shankar Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

making the will, by operation of law, the will stands revoked. (see Sections 69 and 70 of Indian Succession Act, 1925). Registration of a will does not make it any more effective.16. We therefore reiterate that immovable property can … that by virtue of this agreement to sell he got benefit of the doctrine of part performance under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 for half ownership interest in the suit property. RSA No.50/2013

Bharat Mal @ Bharat Kumar vs.ram Avtar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

not married, marries after making the will, by operation of revoked. (see sections 69 and 70 of Indian Succession Act, 1925). Registration of a will does not make it any more effective. the will law, stands Conclusion 15. Therefore, … tenant in the said property. It was also submitted on behalf of the respondent that in terms of Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act,1899,the said General Power of Attorney not having been duly stamped was thus