Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. S.M. Bhandari

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 19A, 19A(2) and 19A(6); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 142

Reported in : (1987)63CTR(AP)166; [1987]167ITR643(AP)

back the amount in the estate of the deceased. He placed reliance on section 357 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (39 of 1925), and also sought reliance on CIT v. Bakshi Sampuran Singh . 5. In view of

Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Another Vs. Ashok Jagjivan Gokal and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

respondent Nos.1 and 2. Learned counsel placed reliance on Sections 192, 193, 301, 317 and 318 of Indian Succession Act 1925 in support of his submission that respondent Nos.1 and 2 who have acted contrary to the interest of … already having been filed by the petitioners against the first respondent. Mr Andhyarujina, learned counsel submits that under Section 317 of the Indian Succession Act, it is duty of the Executor to submit Inventory within six months … Judah Vs. Mrs Isolyne Sarojbashini Bose and Ors.; (3) 2007 (11) SCC 357 (Kanwarjit Singh Dhillon Vs. Hardyal Singh Dhillon and Ors; (4) 2008 (4)SCC

Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. versus Suresh Chand and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]9S.C.R.339

u/s.53A of TP Act, which deals with Part Performance. Headnotes† Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - s.54 - Succession Act, 1925 - s.63 - Evidence Act, 1872 - s.68 - Respondent no.1/plaintiff filed suit no. 613/1997 for possession, mesne … cases, the initial onus on the propounder becomes heavier. [2025] 9 S.C.R. 357 Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. v. Suresh Chand and Anr. 10.9. The … possession of the defendant No.1. • That the Will has not been proved in accordance with law. • Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act is not attracted if the possession of the property is not

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … in the case of National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd vs. James Chadwick and Bros. Ltd. (AIR 1953 SC 357). (f) Finally, it was submitted that the present Petition is not maintainable at the behest of the Petitioner

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … in the case of National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd vs. James Chadwick and Bros. Ltd. (AIR 1953 SC 357). (f) Finally, it was submitted that the present Petition is not maintainable at the behest of the Petitioner

Mathuradas Vassanji Vs. Raimal Hirji

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyFamily

Reported in : AIR1935Bom385; (1935)37BOMLR642; 159Ind.Cas.533

pay the claims of all creditors in full, the executor is bound, under Section 323 of the Indian Succession, Act, 1925, to pay them equally and rateably so far as the estate of the deceased, permits. It is not … the executor may be exonerated (Section 358) or may lose his right to call upon a legatee to-refund (Section 357) and yet the creditor or legatee may be entitled to ' follow the property,' or to ask for

Y. Vishnu Vs. S. Venkatesh

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 357, 421 and 421(1)

Reported in : IV(2006)BC575; [2006]134CompCas314(Kar); 2006CriLJ1853; ILR2006KAR1377; 2006(2)KarLJ389

imprisonment in default of payment of fine, by then. ; Order of Trial Court not correct. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925. Section 2(h): [N. Kumar,J] Proof of Will Legal requirements Duty of the Court Held, Under the Act, the Will … rule that is, if the recovery is for realising expenses of the complainant or the compensation awarded Under Section 357 of Cr.P.C., the power of the Court to issue warrant for recovery of that amount, continues even after

Kumud Lall versus Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through Lrs and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 5 S.C.R. 301

to what extent.Headnotes†Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - ss.13(7), 2(b)(v) - Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - ss.38(12), 2(5)(vi) - Succession Act, 1925 - s.306 - Legal Representatives Suits Act, 1855 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Ord. 22, r.4 … of the wrong-doer vide Rustomji Dorabji v. W.H. Nurse [ILR 44 Mad 357] and Ratanlal v. Baboolal [AIR 1960 MP 200] as well as in … heirs. On notice, both wife and son filed applications4 under Order XXII5 Rule 16 and 47 read with Section 1518 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) and Section 229 of 1986 Act, praying to drop

E.A.V. Krishnamurthy and Son Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 36, 36(1), 36(2) and 41(4)

Reported in : [1985]152ITR640(Mad)

held that, in the circumstances of that case, there was no discontinuance of the business, but only a succession to the business from the joint family to a partnership firm. Jagadisan J., speaking for the Bench, observed … the correct legal position under s. 36(2)(i)(a) of the Act (p. 356, 357) : 'If in a given case, the income of a business is … J. 1. This is a case stated by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The first question, which falls for our decision in this case is : 'Whether, on the facts … debts aggregating to Rs. 5,276 was not admissible as the requirements of section 36(2)(i)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, were not satisfied ?' 2. The

Santeline Fernandes (Through Margarida Gomes) Vs. Mackinnon Mackenzie ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 3, 4, 11, 14A and 32; Indian Succession Act - Sections 306

Reported in : (1968)IILLJ189Bom; 1968MhLJ292

to. ;The words 'other personal injuries not causing death of the parties' in Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, must be construed ejusdem genvris with the words preceding, namely, 'defamation, assault as defined in the Indian Penal … personalis moritur cum persona as to which Sadasiva Ayyar, J., in Rustomji Dorabji v. Nurse I.L.R. 1920 Mad. 357 said (p. 369) : '... I may add that it seems to me to be based upon no