Advanced Search Results

Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. versus Suresh Chand and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]9S.C.R.339

u/s.53A of TP Act, which deals with Part Performance. Headnotes† Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - s.54 - Succession Act, 1925 - s.63 - Evidence Act, 1872 - s.68 - Respondent no.1/plaintiff filed suit no. 613/1997 for possession, mesne … being a minor, may 8 AIR 1959 SC 443 [2025] 9 S.C.R. 355 Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. v. Suresh Chand and Anr. dispose of … possession of the defendant No.1. • That the Will has not been proved in accordance with law. • Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act is not attracted if the possession of the property is not

P. Mani Alias P. Balasubramaniam Vs. P. Viswanathan (Deceased) and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 5, 45, 47, 63, 67, 68, 73, 114 and 118; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 59, 63, 89 and 289; Hindu Succession Act - Sections 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Hindu Law

Reported in : 2008(2)CTC831; (2008)4MLJ1199

v. Subodh Kumar Banerjee (since deceased and after him his LRs) and Ors., wherein it is held as follows:Succession Act (1925), Sections 63 and 289 - Will - Mode of proof - Onus - Principles indicated - When court … [1962]3SCR195 Rani Purnima Debi and Anr. v. Kumar Khagendra Narayan Deb and Anr., it is observed as follows:Succession Act (1925), Section 63 Will - Execution - Genuineness - Testator not making proper provision for his wife and sister depending … execution of the will.Further, in the aforesaid decision at page 354 and 355 it is laid down as follows:(b) Evidence Act (1872), Sections 5 and

Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar and Others Vs. Jayashree Jayant Salgaonkar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

otherwise, they submit, would be to put these corporate statutes in direct and irreconcilable conflict with the Indian Succession Act, 1925. For, Mr. Shah and Mr. Tamboly say, not only would succession by intestacy be defeated by a corporate … Allahabad High Court in Kesari Devi v. Dharma Devi [AIR 1962 All 355] on which reliance was placed by the High Court in dismissing the … 29A of the SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations, 1996. Defendant No.6 makes a similar claim on the basis of Section 45-ZA of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 in respect of a fixed deposit receipt for Rs.50 lakhs with

Emperor Vs. Babu Pandurang Mhaske

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1934)36BOMLR382

enhance the sentence is dealt with. ;Emperor v. Mongal Naran (1924) 27 Bom. L.R. 355. disapproved. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

Sudhir Chandra Pal and anr. Vs. Uttara Sundari Pal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1933Cal571,145Ind.Cas.684

As regards the question of locus standi the learned Judge no doubt refers to Sections 232 and 233, Succession Act. He was entitled to read the will in order to see whether in the circumstances the petitioners could … the will. Surjya died on 16th March 1924 and he left no issue. Dhanram died on 3rd January 1925. Ram Mohan died on 18th December 1927. The petitioners claim that according to the provisions of the will … the question of locus standi the learned Judge no doubt refers to Sections 232 and 233, Succession Act. He was entitled to read the will … case against Sudhir, his brother Bepin, and others making charges under Sections 355 and 352, I.P.C. The case ended on 26th June 1928, the accused

Jagdish Prasad Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

reasoning of the learned Single Judge is premised on a co-joint reading of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and three decisions of the Supreme Court reported … % Judgment Reserved On : February 24, 2015 Judgment Delivered On : March 03, 2015 + FAO (OS) 355/2008 JAGDISH PRASAD Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Rajesh Rai, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Rama Arora, Advocate for Land

Kashiram Vs. Bhura and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 82 to 88 and 95; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14(2); Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1951 - Sections 2(9) and 38

Reported in : AIR1981MP236

as a whole. The decided cases and the provisions contained in Sections 82 to 88 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, lay down that as far as possible such construction as would give to every expression in the Will … Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals. Alienated Lands) Act, 1950, that malikmakbuza rights were conferred on her under Section 38 of the Abolition Act since she was in possession on the date of abolition and that as … has been reiterated in Nathoo Lal v. Durga Prasad. AIR 1954 SC 355.4. When read in the light of the above principles, the recitals in

Jagdish Prasad vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Samiti. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition under Sections 276 & 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 was filed seeking probate of a document dated 9th February, 1982 stated to be the validly executed last … Advs. for objector Pujya Sadhvi Shantanand Smarak Samiti. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition under Sections 276 & 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 was filed seeking probate of a document dated 9th

Yad Ram (Deceased) Through His Lrs. Vs. Bir Singh and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2)

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi475; 1974LabIC970; (1974)IILLJ306Del; 1974RLR305

the view of the Bombay High Court. (23) Reliance is then placed on section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to urge that rights of a deceased survive to his executors or administrators. This general provision provides for … Ltd. (respondent No. 2) from October 26. 1963 to December 16, 1966 on a monthly salary of Rs. 355. In answer to the claim of the petitioner, the management denied the relationship and urged that the application

In the Goods of Gagan Chandra Das

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372, 373 and 383

Reported in : AIR1950Cal578

throughout British India. That rule does not meet the point in hand.9. Turning to the sections of the Succession Act, the material sections are Sections 370 to 390, Part 10 of the Act. These sections replace the Succession … Section 18 of Act VII [7] of 1889 has been replaced by Section 383 of the Act of 1925. There is no difference in the wording of the two sections. On the authority of that case, it … Simpson, (1890) 25 Q. B. D. 183: (59 L. J. Q. B. 355), I make this observation, as I shall refer to certain decisions on