Advanced Search Results
Raana Haripada Roy Vs. Subhash Chander Rewari
Mumbai
Sep-17-2013
Education
him to agitate the grant of probate. 5. Learned counsel placed reliance on section 230 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in support of his submission that the renunciation by the executor could not be done orally and it … judgment of the Supreme Court in case of RamchandraRambux vs. Champabai and others reported in AIR 1965 SC 354 in support of his submission that if there are surrounding circumstances which creates suspicious in the mind of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMichael Lorence Lopis and Others Vs. Joseph Lorence Lopis and Others
Mumbai
Nov-07-2014
Land Acquisition
June, 1983. The said deceased and the parties to this proceedings are governed by the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 being Christians. The said will was registered with the sub registrars office. On 9th November, 1987, the said … To what relief Petitioner is entitled for? 4. Whether Petition is not maintainable for non-compliance of provisions of section 281 of Indian Succession Act of 1925? 5. What decree and order? 8. The trial court rendered a … SCC 443 H.Venkatachala Iyengar vs. B.N.Thimmajamma and others. (2) AIR 1965 SC 354 Ramchandra Rambux vs. Champabai and others. (3) AIR 1977 SC 74 Smt.Jaswant
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMichael Lorence Lopis and Others Vs. Joseph Lorence Lopis and Others
Mumbai
Nov-07-2014
Land Acquisition
June, 1983. The said deceased and the parties to this proceedings are governed by the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 being Christians. The said will was registered with the sub registrars office. On 9th November, 1987, the said … To what relief Petitioner is entitled for? 4. Whether Petition is not maintainable for non-compliance of provisions of section 281 of Indian Succession Act of 1925? 5. What decree and order? 8. The trial court rendered a … SCC 443 H.Venkatachala Iyengar vs. B.N.Thimmajamma and others. (2) AIR 1965 SC 354 Ramchandra Rambux vs. Champabai and others. (3) AIR 1977 SC 74 Smt.Jaswant
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P. Mani Alias P. Balasubramaniam Vs. P. Viswanathan (Deceased) and ors ...
Chennai
Feb-19-2008
Family
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 5, 45, 47, 63, 67, 68, 73, 114 and 118; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 59, 63, 89 and 289; Hindu Succession Act - Sections 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Hindu Law
2008(2)CTC831; (2008)4MLJ1199
v. Subodh Kumar Banerjee (since deceased and after him his LRs) and Ors., wherein it is held as follows:Succession Act (1925), Sections 63 and 289 - Will - Mode of proof - Onus - Principles indicated - When court … [1962]3SCR195 Rani Purnima Debi and Anr. v. Kumar Khagendra Narayan Deb and Anr., it is observed as follows:Succession Act (1925), Section 63 Will - Execution - Genuineness - Testator not making proper provision for his wife and sister depending … attending the execution of the will.Further, in the aforesaid decision at page 354 and 355 it is laid down as follows:(b) Evidence Act (1872), Sections
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Palani and Others Vs. S. Bharathi Dasan (Deceased) and Others
Chennai
Jan-12-2016
Land Acquisition
of 2007 numbered on conversion of O.P.No.607 of 2007, filed under Sections 232 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Order 25 Rule 5 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, praying that Letters of Administration … (Prayers: T.O.S.No.22 of 2007 numbered on conversion of O.P.No.607 of 2007, filed under Sections 232 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Order 25 Rule 5 of the Madras High … SC 443and Management Committee, T.K.Ghosh's Academy Vs. T.C.Palit - 1974 (2) SCC 354 : AIR 1974 SC 1495). 35. We may not delve deep into
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Kuppusami Pillai Vs. Jayalakshmi Ammal
Chennai
Mar-15-1934
Land Acquisition
154Ind.Cas.537
is not of the full interest in remainder, that disposition is void under Section 100 of the Indian Succession Act, 1865, (corresponding to Section 113 of the Succession Act of 1925) and that the plaintiff, therefore, cannot maintain … Law. (See also Soundarrajan v. Natarajan 62 Ind Cas. 987 : 44 M. 446 470 : 40 M.L.J. 354 : 29 M.L.T. 210 : (1924) M.W.N. 210 : 13 L.W. 662 bottom and 462 Page of 44
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Rameshwar Ramnath
Mumbai
Feb-01-1929
Criminal
(1929)31BOMLR529
accused.;Kishan Singh v. The King-Emperor (1928) L.R. 55 I.A. 390, S.C. 30 Bom. L.R. 1572 followed. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … of acquittal irrespective of the applicant being the Local Government.4. In In re Faredoon Cawasji 19 Bom. L.R. 354 a Divisional Bench of this Court held that this Court has power under Section 439 of the Criminal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited States Vs. Montoya De Hernandez
US Supreme Court
Jul-01-1985
Land Acquisition
S. 114 (1975). [ Footnote 2/21 ] Cf. Mallory v. United States, 354 U. S. 449 , 354 U. S. 451 -452 (1957); McNabb v. … takes about six days off a person's life expectancy [ Footnote 2/32 ]) and from the perspective of successive generations. The "additivity" factor -- the cumulative effect of x-rays on an individual's biological and genetic wellbeing -- … not unreasonably long. Alimentary canal smuggling cannot be detected in the amount of time in which other illegal activity may be investigated through brief stops. When respondent refused an x-ray as an alternative to simply awaiting her
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. versus Suresh Chand and Anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-01-2025
Land Acquisition
[2025]9S.C.R.339
u/s.53A of TP Act, which deals with Part Performance. Headnotes† Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - s.54 - Succession Act, 1925 - s.63 - Evidence Act, 1872 - s.68 - Respondent no.1/plaintiff filed suit no. 613/1997 for possession, mesne … of a will are that it is 7 (2012) 13 SCC 80 354 [2025] 9 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports intended to come into effect only … possession of the defendant No.1. • That the Will has not been proved in accordance with law. • Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act is not attracted if the possession of the property is not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Ramniwasi Vs. Madanlal
Rajasthan
Jan-18-1973
PropertyCivil
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act - Sections 68
AIR1973Raj295; 1973()WLN65
Kan Singh, J.1. The appeal before me is by a caveator under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Section 96, Civil P. C. and is directed against the judgment of the learned District Judge. … Venkatachala Jyengar v. B. N. Thimmajamma, AIR 1959 SC 443; 2. Ramchandra v. Cham Bai, AIR 1965 SC 354; 3. Gorantla Thataiah v. Thotakura Venkata Subbaiah, AIR 1968 SC 1332; 4. Vellaswamy Servai v. Sivaraman Servai, AIR
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »