Advanced Search Results

Basti Ram Vs. Ved Parkash and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law - Article 382; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 114 and 115

Reported in : AIR1974P& H152

share and even more than that.' By virtue of Section 57 read with Schedule III of the Indian Succession Act, 1925(hereinafter referred to as the Act), Sections 114 and 115 have been made applicable to all Wills made … 1. This judgment will dispose of R. F. A. 353 of 1962 and Cross Objections marked as C. M. 312/C of 1963. 2. This regular first appeal has

N. Namberumal Chetti Vs. Veeraperumal Pillai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1930Mad956; (1930)59MLJ596

the legacy as administrator of Aparanji's estate, from establishing his claim to the legacy?13. Section 213 (1), Indian Succession Act, 1925, says:No right as executor or legatee can be established in any Court of Justice, unless a Court of … pronote. The rate of interest payable on a legacy when the testator is a Hindu is fixed by Section 353, Indian Succession Act, at 6 per cent, and under Section 351 interest begins to run from the expiration

Baburao Tatyaji Bhosle Vs. Madho Shrihari Aney

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 30, 32, 33, 36, 36(8), 37, 57, 79, 81, 82, 85, 90, 90(3), 90(5), 98, 99, 99(1), 100, 116A(1), 117, 123, 123(3), 123(4), 140, 141 and 149; Representation of the People (Amendment) Act, 1958

Reported in : AIR1961Bom29; (1961)63BOMLR20; ILR1960Bom994

Bom. L.R. 353 and K. Kamaraja Nadar v. Kunju Thevar [1958] A.I.R. S.C. 687, referred to. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

P. Mani Alias P. Balasubramaniam Vs. P. Viswanathan (Deceased) and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 5, 45, 47, 63, 67, 68, 73, 114 and 118; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 59, 63, 89 and 289; Hindu Succession Act - Sections 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Hindu Law

Reported in : 2008(2)CTC831; (2008)4MLJ1199

v. Subodh Kumar Banerjee (since deceased and after him his LRs) and Ors., wherein it is held as follows:Succession Act (1925), Sections 63 and 289 - Will - Mode of proof - Onus - Principles indicated - When court … [1962]3SCR195 Rani Purnima Debi and Anr. v. Kumar Khagendra Narayan Deb and Anr., it is observed as follows:Succession Act (1925), Section 63 Will - Execution - Genuineness - Testator not making proper provision for his wife and sister depending … the Will and his mother also filed a suit in C.S. No. 353 of 1987 and the same was numbered as O.S. No. 12852 of

Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. versus Suresh Chand and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]9S.C.R.339

u/s.53A of TP Act, which deals with Part Performance. Headnotes† Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - s.54 - Succession Act, 1925 - s.63 - Evidence Act, 1872 - s.68 - Respondent no.1/plaintiff filed suit no. 613/1997 for possession, mesne … power of attorney is an agency by which the [2025] 9 S.C.R. 353 Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. v. Suresh Chand and Anr. agent derives … possession of the defendant No.1. • That the Will has not been proved in accordance with law. • Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act is not attracted if the possession of the property is not

Anant Trimbak Sabnis Vs. Vasant Pratap Pandit

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(11), 13(1)(3) and 15; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 211, 211(I) and 213; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 2, 5, 7, 12, 13, 15, 15(1) and 15(2); Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Amendment) Act, 1973; B.T. and A. Act, 1948 - Sections 2(21); Indian Companies Act - Sections 312; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Amendment) Act, 1978; Evacuee Property Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1980Bom69; 1979MhLJ755

extent, this suit is liable to be dismissed.25. Mr. Parekh then relies on Section 211 of the Indian Succession Act. 1925 and contends that even if bequest of the tenancy rights is held to be ineffective, the plaintiff Executor … the Kings Bench in the case of Doe'd. Good be hare v. Sevan. (1815) 3 M. & S. 353, as also, the judgments of the Privy Council and S. C, in the case of Simon Christopher v.

353/2008

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

with Wills which have not been executed in accordance with section 63(c) and section 281 of the Indian Succession act, 1925. It is also mentioned in these reports that the Hon'ble Judge had directed the department to act in … 1 PLA No. 353 of 2008 In the High Court at Calcutta Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction -- In the Goods of :

Gokaldas Melaram Vs. Baldevdas T. Chabria

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306

Reported in : AIR1961Kant188; AIR1961Mys188

petition shall be costs in the cause and shall abide the eventual result. 20. Revision dismissed. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925. Section 2(h): [N. Kumar,J] Proof of Will Legal requirements Duty of the Court Held, Under the Act, the Will … suit. 14. The decision of the former High Court of Mysore in Moodlanna v. Basappa, 20 Mys LJ 353 on which Mr. Gopivallabha lyengar relied is, in my opinion, of no assistance to him. What was decided

Ashok Kothari Vs. Dipti Bavishi

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 234, 261, 263, 268, 279, 283 and 283(1); ;Probate and Administration Act - Sections 62 to 78; ;Administrator-General's Act; ;Hindu Wills Act; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : AIR2007Cal21

with this Chapter and the said Acts.15. We shall hereafter discuss the procedure laid down in the Indian Succession Act 1925 but regard being had to the fact that probate is granted by this Court both in the Common … practice as described in Tristram and Coote's Probate Practice, 13th Edition p. 353, that Durgapati being a party interested as reversloner in the estate of … Bench of this Court opined as follows:The probate can be revoked upon any of the grounds mentioned In Section 234. The duty of the Judge upon an application being made under this section somewhat depends upon what

Arthamudi Ramu and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 23; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2A; Motor Vehicles Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rules 1 and 3; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2008ACJ1659; 2006(5)ALD243

situation that emerges on account of the death of a party to proceedings. Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act') provides for continuation of the proceedings by or against an individual even after the … this Court in United India Insurance Co. Limited v. E. Laxma Reddy (died) per LRs. 2006 (3) ALD 353.6. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, submits that the Tribunal applied the correct principle