Advanced Search Results

Rajanikant Mansukhlal Vs. Kiko Ratilal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1932Bom506; (1932)34BOMLR1124; 140Ind.Cas.206

of the land were demonstrative legacies and fell within Section 150 and not Section 142 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 :;Calow v. Calow [1928] 1 Ch. 710, Page v. Leapingwell (1812) 18 Ves. Jun. 463, and Fryer v. … appellant that if these legacies are demonstrative legacies and not specific legacies she is entitled to interest under Section 351 of the Indian Succession Act.7. It is further urged on behalf of the appellant that if thers legacies

Prativa Bose Vs. Kumar Rupendra Deb Raikat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 158, 178 and 181; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 48 and 141 - Order XXXVIII; Limitation Act, 1877; Arbitration Act; Bengal Civil Court Act, 1871- Sections 12; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 23; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 192-195; Bengal Wills and Intestacy Regulation, 1799 - 2, 3, IV and V; Mahomedan Law; Bengal Wills and Intestacy Regulation, 1793 - Sections 2 and XIX; Central Provinces Laws Act, 1876; Railway and Canal Traffic Act, 1854 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1965SC540; [1964]4SCR69

have issued it to apply to such a case. Then it was said that ss. 192-195 of the Succession Act, 1925 impliedly repeated s. 4 of the Regulation. These sections of the Succession Act no doubt Act no doubt … the Limitation Act would not apply to such application. (1) [1953] S.C.R. 351, 371. The next question is whether the order could only be made … Diwani Adalat in the execution of wills and administration to the estate of persons dying intestate." The first section is in the nature or a preamble, and so far as relevant,sets out the object of the Regulation

Parameshwaran Subramani Vs. Nil

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

rule, quoted above. The petition is disposed of. No costs. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 129 Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 291 Grant of Letters of Administration Petitioners sought to grant Letters of Administration to Property and credits of … Subba Rao AIR 1972 Mys 293: (1972) 1 Mys LJ 578 (ii) Adwait Nath Sil AIR 1948 ALL 351 (FB) (iii) Deputy Commissioner of .... Vs Jagadish Chandra Deo Dhabal Deb 62 Ind case 513 The provisions

Thomas MartIn Vs. Teresa Martin

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR2003Ker29

7th April 2000. Thereafter, respondent in the appeal filed I.A. No. 351/2000 under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for revocation of the grant of probate. The petition for revocation of the probate was numbered as LA.

Kaliappan (Died) and Others Vs. A.K. Somasundaram (Died) and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

with 'Transfer for Benefit of Unborn Person' is almost similar to that of Section 113 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. It cannot be lost sight of that Section 13 of the Transfer of Property Act controls Section 113 … and is invalid as to the rest.” 47. InP.V.S.Vencatachellum V. P.V.S.Kabalamurthy Pillai, AIR 1955 Madras 350 at page 351, it is held thus: “Under Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act, a condition absolutely restraining a

N. Namberumal Chetti Vs. Veeraperumal Pillai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1930Mad956; (1930)59MLJ596

the legacy as administrator of Aparanji's estate, from establishing his claim to the legacy?13. Section 213 (1), Indian Succession Act, 1925, says:No right as executor or legatee can be established in any Court of Justice, unless a Court of … testator is a Hindu is fixed by Section 353, Indian Succession Act, at 6 per cent, and under Section 351 interest begins to run from the expiration of one year from the testator's death. I agree, for the

P.A.T. Subbaraya Pillai Vs. Vaheesan, Minor and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 102, 152, 180 and 190

Reported in : AIR1963Mad405

of 1958 are also dismissed with costs. Family - partition - Sections 102, 152, 180 and 190 of Succession Act, 1925 - appeal against Order passed by Court below regarding recovery of legacies granted under will - Section 152 … one year after the expiry of the date of the death of the testator. This is based upon Section 351 of the Indian Succession Act. The award of interest by the learned Judge is, therefore, correct though inone

Amal Krishna Aditya Vs. Ganesh Chandra Das

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyTenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 106; ;Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 19; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 13(1)

Reported in : AIR1998Cal221

Morley v. Bird, (1798) 3 Ves 628. This principle has been adopted in Section 106 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, replacing Section 93 of the Indian Succession Act, 1865 and a joint tenancy has been recognised in a … as cited by Mr. Roy Chowdhury namely, Smt. Sumilita Bhattacharyya v. Smt. Nila Chatterjee, (1989) 2 Cal LJ 351 which was a Division Bench judgment, and also in the case of Smt. Kamala Devi Mukherjee v. Arun

Shamsunder Rajkumar Vs. Bharat Oil Mills

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 17, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 19, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 1, 2 and 3; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 17 and 25

Reported in : AIR1964Bom38; (1963)65BOMLR584; ILR1963Bom436; 1963MhLJ414

Life Assurance Company (1944) 46 Bom. L.R. 767 : S.C. [1944] A.I.R. Bom. 351, referred to. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

Champa Devi and ors Vs. Gulabi Devi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

on the 3rd day of July, 2013) The applicants have preferred an application under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter it would be referred to as the 'Act') before the Civil Judge, Class I, Baidhan for grant