Advanced Search Results

Hasina Bibi Vs. Amurat Bibi and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372 and 379; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 35 - Schedule - Articles 11 and 12

Reported in : AIR2003Ori205; 96(2003)CLT241; 2003(II)OLR215

for parties.3. The petitioner is a woman. She has made an application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of succession certificate to the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), First Court, Cuttack (vide Misc. Case … portion of the notification which reads as follows ;'SRO No. 575/94- In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 35 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 (VII of 1870) the State Government do hereby remit in the whole

Paru Kutty Amma and ors. Vs. Chettath Navoth Lakshmi Amma and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 180; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 35

Reported in : AIR1954Mad556

with costs to be paid by respondents 1 to 4. Property - contesting Will - Section 180 of Succession Act, 1925 and Section 35 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - revision petition against Order of Subordinate Judge directing

S. Sudaramurthy and Others Vs. Saraswathi Lakshmanan and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

in favour of defendants 1 and 2 is void. Attention is drawn to Section 122 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which reads as follows: 122. Onerous bequests. “ Where a bequest imposes an obligation on the legatee, he … claim to be in joint possession of the property in seeking to value the suit in terms of Section 35(2) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the KCFSV Act', for

Suphal Marandi S/O Late Dewan Marandi Vs. Smt. Kapra Murmu W/O Late Ch ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 32 to 35; Special Marriage Act, 1872 - Sections 24

Reported in : 2005(3)BLJR2334; [2006(1)JCR37(Jhr)]

succession certificate in respect of the estate of the deceased be granted in favour of the appellant. Indian Succession Act, 1925, Sections 32 to 35 - Grant of succession certificate--Deposits lying in name of deceased wife of appellant--Wife having … evidence came to the conclusion that the deceased left behind two brothers also and, therefore, in terms of Section 35 of the Indian Succession Act since the appellant knowingly concealed the fact that the deceased died leaving behind

Maniklal Shah Vs. Hiralal Shaw

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35 and 77; ; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923; ; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 300, 300(1), 300(2) and 800; ; Probate and Administration Act, 1881 - Section 2; ; Succession (Amendment) Act, 1929 - Section 2

Reported in : AIR1950Cal377,54CWN225

the concurrent jurisdiction which the High Court has with the District Judge under Sub-section (1) of Section 300, Succession Act, 1925, is restricted by Sub-section (2) of that section.It is pointed out that the present case is one to … is thus kept by a public servant in the discharge of his official duty and is admissible under Section 35, Evidence Act. Any entry in such a register can be proved under Section 77, Evidence Act by the

Madhukar D. Shende Vs. Tarabai Aba Shedage

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 11, 13, 35 and 68; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR2002SC637; 2002(1)ALLMR(SC)921; 2002(50)BLJR509; 2002(6)BomCR522; (2002)2BOMLR295; (2002)1CALLT44(SC); (SCSuppl)2002(2)CHN13; [2002(1)JCR448(SC)]; JT2002(1)SC74; (2002)1; (2002) 2 SCC 85

evidence tendered in proof of a will should additionally satisfy the requirement of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. If after considering the matters before it, that is, … had come to vest in one Babu Kanha Mali who had orally gifted the same to the defendant 35 or 40 years prior to the institution of the suit and therefore the title in the suit property

Manek Dara Sukhadwalla Vs. Shernaz Faroukh Lawyer and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the remedy of filing an Application for revocation of the probate under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 15. Learned Counsel then pointed out the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of G. Gopal … which in our considered view may be applied in a case of this nature are: ........." (emphasis supplied) 35. In view of the above discussion, even otherwise, the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Krishna Kumar

Sh. Asha Sehgal and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act 1925 - Sections 276; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rule 4

Reported in : 2008(102)DRJ172

are wife and children of Mr. Surender Kumar Sehgal filed a petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 seeking probate of the will in question purported to have been executed by the testator in their favor. … their cross examination by the appellants that Mr. Surender Kumar Sehgal was the adopted son of the testator. 35. In such circumstances learned Trial Judge has correctly opined that the appellants have failed to establish that Mr.

Vishwa Nath and anr. Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 34, 35, 40 and 40A; Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Rules, 1901 - Rule A378(B); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3141

case (supra). Bala Prasad's case (supra), Smt. Pitmo's case (supra) and Awadeshs case (supra) were all on Indian Succession Act, 1925, with regard to registered Will. There is no dispute with regard to principles laid down for proof of … was within the jurisdiction of the Naib Tahsildar to ignore the registered Will while passing an order under Section 35 of U. P. Land Revenue Act, 1901. For considering the submission raised by counsel for the petitioners, it

Smt. Radhamma and ors. Vs. H.N. Muddukrishna and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4(1), 14 and 30; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 281A, 281A(1) and 281A(3); Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 35(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; Indian Succession Act, 1925; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR2006Kant68; 2006(1)KarLJ176

which is capable of being so disposed of by him, in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (39 of 1925) or any other law for the time being in force and applicable to Hindus.Explanation.--The interest … plaint is hit by provisions of Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988?2. Whether defendant 2(e) proves that provisions of Section 14 of Hindu Succession Act is a bar to maintain plea against Schedule 'H' of plaint?12. R.F.A. No. … document was read over to the executant and understood by him.37. Section 35(1)(a) and (b) of the Registration Act, 1908 refers to the admission required