Advanced Search Results

V.M. Raghavalu Naidu and Sons by Executors, C.G. Krishnaswami Naidu an ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 3, 10, 41 and 41(1)

Reported in : AIR1950Mad790; [1950]18ITR787(Mad); (1950)IIMLJ300

and when the executors of a will have become trustees and the legatees have become beneficiaries.18. Chapter 7, Succession Act, 1925, succinctly defines the duties of executors. Shortly stated it is their duty to clear the estate to pay … They have not done that. Regarding the maintenance allowances also the situation stands in the same position. Under Section 348 of the Act as the annuities have not been charged and no fund has been appropriated by the

M/S. Sri Gajanan Stores Rep. by Its Managing Partner Sudhakar Phadki, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

as follows: O.P.No.342 of 1995: This O.P. was filed by the petitioners therein under Section 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short ‘the Act’) for granting probate of the Will, dated 06-08-1993 pertaining to the petition ‘A’ and … 1. These two appeals are filed against the common order, dated 02-08-1999 passed in O.P.Nos.342 of 1995 and 348 of 1996 respectively on the file of the II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad. 2.

Sanju Devi and ors. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this first appeal under Section 348 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) the appellants/petitioners impugn the order of the Court below dated 18.9.2013 which

N. Renuka Devi Vs. E. Lalitha and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

out of the above said decisions, it is necessary to take notice of the relevant provisions in the Succession Act, 1925. Section 266 of the Act provides that the District Judge shall have, in relation to the granting of Probate … 1914 Bom 8), Gangabai Vs. Jaikishindas, AIR 1938 Sind 36 (FB). In re Seethalakshmi, ILR (1980) 2 Ker 348 and Bai Zabu Khima Vs. Amardas, AIR 1967 Guj. 214, wherein it was held that contentious probate proceedings

Mariyaya Chanviraya Hiremath Vs. Shantirappa Danappa Nelvigi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1939Bom338; (1939)41BOMLR575

v. Cowasjee Dadabhoy (1924) I.L.R. 48 Bom. 348 : S.C. 26 Bom. L.R. 209, commented on. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

Philo Peter and anr. Vs. Divyanathan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222, 276 and 295; T.N. Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Schedule - Article 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : AIR1989Mad111; (1988)IIMLJ1

out of the above said decisions, it is necessary to take notice of the relevant provisions in the Succession Act, 1925. Section 266 of the Act provides that the District Judge shall have, in relation to the granting of Probate … 1914 Bom 8), Gangabai v. Jaikishindas, AIR 1938 Sind 36 (FB). In re Seethalakshmi, ILR (1980) 2 Ker 348 and Bai Zabu Khima v. Amardas, , wherein it was held thatcontentious probate proceedings must take the form

Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. versus Suresh Chand and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]9S.C.R.339

u/s.53A of TP Act, which deals with Part Performance. Headnotes† Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - s.54 - Succession Act, 1925 - s.63 - Evidence Act, 1872 - s.68 - Respondent no.1/plaintiff filed suit no. 613/1997 for possession, mesne … in exchange for a price paid or promised or part-paid and part-promised. 348 [2025] 9 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports Sale how made. -Such transfer, in … possession of the defendant No.1. • That the Will has not been proved in accordance with law. • Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act is not attracted if the possession of the property is not

Philo Peter and anr. Vs. Divyanathan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1988)2MLJ1

of the above said decisions, it is necessary to take notice of the relevant provisions in the Indian Succession Act (1925), Section 226 of the Act provides that the District Judge shall have, in relation to the granting of Probate … Bom. 309 Ganga Bai v. Jaikishindas, A.I.R. 1938 Sindh 36, In Re Seethalakshmi and Ors. I.L.R. (1980) Ker. 348 and Zabu Khima v. Amardas : AIR1967Guj214 , wherein it was held that contentious probate proceedings must take

Zarina @ Taushida Latif Qureshi Vs. Dilip Modji Donakia and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

not established. 40. The Petitioner has no locus to challenge the probate. The Petition is dismissed with costs. Succession Act, 1925 - Section 264, 300 – Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 50, 60 – Cases Referred: 1. Beant Singh … Choudhary and Ors. AIR 1954 SC 601 (Para 36). Comparative Citations: 2012 (5) MAH.L.J 863, 2012 (6) BCR 348, 2013 (1) ALL MR 210

Gyan Anand vs State of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Anand. The appellant propounded the said Will by filing the underlying petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as “ISA”), claiming himself to be the beneficiary. Vide the impugned judgment, however, the Trial … COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 01.04.2026Pronounced on : 26.05.2026Uploaded on : 26.05.2026 + FAO 348/2008 GYAN ANAND .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Ms. Rajshri Ashutosh Dubey, Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Mr. Amit P. Shahi,