Advanced Search Results

Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. versus Suresh Chand and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]9S.C.R.339

u/s.53A of TP Act, which deals with Part Performance. Headnotes† Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - s.54 - Succession Act, 1925 - s.63 - Evidence Act, 1872 - s.68 - Respondent no.1/plaintiff filed suit no. 613/1997 for possession, mesne … would confer a valid title over the suit property? [2025] 9 S.C.R. 347 Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. v. Suresh Chand and Anr. II. Whether … possession of the defendant No.1. • That the Will has not been proved in accordance with law. • Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act is not attracted if the possession of the property is not

inkollu Sasikala @ Shayamala and anr. Vs. Inkollu Venkata Ratnamma and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 213, 213(1), 213(2), 214, 257, 264, 264(2), 270, 370 and 384; Administrator General's Act, 1913 - Sections 31 and 32

Reported in : 2004(6)ALT18

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This civil miscellaneous appeal is filed under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 ('the Act' for brevity) against the Judgment and decree dated 06.03.2003 passed by the learned I Additional District … specifically dealt with by a Division Bench of this Court in A.S. Murthy v. D.V.S.S. Murthy, 1979(2) ALT 347 and it was held that the Courts in the State of Andhra Pradesh do not have the power

Jiban Roy Choudhury Vs. Sm. Taramoyee Debi

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 13(1)

Reported in : AIR1979Cal339

property as provided in the will in terms of the will as also Section 119 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The concept of 'full owner' in Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 used in the context … in the instant suit.'10-11. In Carritt Moran & Co. P. Ltd. v. Ronea Ltd., ILR (1969) 1 Cal 347 the Division Bench following Yogamava's case, P. N. Mookerjee, J. delivering the judgment of the Court, observed:'The plaintiff,

Emperor Vs. Suleman Ibrahim Nakhuda

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1911)13BOMLR201

to sustain the charges. The committal can be quash ed on a point of law only. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … of illegality. Therefore, I agree with the order proposed. Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 215, 347--Order of committal--Quashwing of--Point of law--Practice.;An order of committal to the Sessions Court cannot be quashed by the High

Ahmed Ebrahim Vorajee Vs. the Government of the Province of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1943Bom50; (1942)44BOMLR912

certificate, which amounts to a refusal to revoke it, does not fall under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and is not appealable.;Manchharam v. Kalidas (1894) I.L.R. 19 Bom. 821 and Sharif-un-nissa Bibi v. Masum Ali (1920) … Manchharam v. Kalidas I.L.R. (1894) 19 Bom. 821 and Sharif-un-nissa Bibi v. Masum Ali (1920) I.L.R. 42 All. 347. In the former case there were two applications for revoking the certificates granted to two different persons with

Jayantilal Mansukhlal and anr. Vs. Mehta Chhanalal Ambalal

Court : Gujarat

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 21 and 105

Reported in : AIR1968Guj212; (1968)0GLR129

21 of the Act thus acts as a proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 105 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in cases governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.(19) In India, prior to the enactment of the Hindu … that in an earlier Bombay decision in Yeknath v. Laxmibai, 24 Bom LR 836 = (AIR 1922 Bom 347), Macleod, C. J. and Shah, J., while dealing with the question of the power of a Hindu widow

S. Maldi Reddy (Dead) by His Lrs. Vs. M. Ramakrishna Reddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57 and 213(1) and (2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 3

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD128; 2001(4)ALT586

is clear from the bare reading of Section 213(2) read with Section 57(a) and (b) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 that the prohibition contained in sub-section (1) of Section 213 applies to wills executed by Hindus on or … petitioners for this proposition had relied upon a decision in A.S. Murthy v. D.V.S.S. Murthy, 1979 (2) ALT 347, wherein the Division Bench was pleased to observe that Section 213(2) of the Indian Succession Act excludes wills

Dokala Buchiraju Vs. Dokala Bangaramma (Died) by Lr

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(11) and 11 - Order 22, Rule 5; Indian Sucession Act, 1925 - Sections 57 and 213;

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD676; 1999(1)ALT527

probate of the Will or letters of administration. By referring to Sections 57 and 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and also by relying upon earlier judgment of this Court reported in A.S. Murthy v. D.V.S. Murthy, 1979 … this Court reported in A.S. Murthy v. D.V.S. Murthy, 1979 (2) ALT 347, this Court has held that Section 213(1) of the Indian Succession Act, … record as legal representative of the deceased Bangaramma, and it is not a fit case for interference under Section 115 of CPC and therefore prayed for the dismissal of the revision petition.4. Both the Counsel took me

Radhamma Vs. h.n. Muddukrishna

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

which is capable of being so disposed of by him, in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, or any other law for the time being in force and applicable to Hindus. Explanation: The interest of … of the testator held that the respondents have established the due execution of the Will as required under Section 68 of the Evidence Act. But while answering the question in reference to the 1/10th share of the

Subha@ Bhasura vs Ramesan

Court : Kerala

execution and attestation of Will were effected in adherence to the requirements under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Due execution of Will cannot be proved otherwise than by recourse to the aforesaid provisions even in the