Advanced Search Results

Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar and Others Vs. Jayashree Jayant Salgaonkar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

otherwise, they submit, would be to put these corporate statutes in direct and irreconcilable conflict with the Indian Succession Act, 1925. For, Mr. Shah and Mr. Tamboly say, not only would succession by intestacy be defeated by a corporate … and Vegetable Merchants Union v The Delhi Improvement Trust (AIR 1957 SC 344; Kokate, paragraph 18.), Dr. M. Ismail Faruqi v Union of India, (1994) … 29A of the SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations, 1996. Defendant No.6 makes a similar claim on the basis of Section 45-ZA of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 in respect of a fixed deposit receipt for Rs.50 lakhs with

Shakti Yezdani and Others Vs. Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

the law of inheritance? (iii) Whether a bequest made in a Will executed in accordance with the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in respect of shares or securities of the deceased supersedes the nomination made under the provisions of Sections … Bhattacharjee case [Usha Ranjan Bhattacharjee v. Abinash Chandra Chakraborty, (1997) 10 SCC 344]. In this behalf, it is necessary to clarify that transfer of share … Kokate's case, in paragraphs 24 and 25, it was held thus: 24. In the light of these judgments section 109A of the Companies Act is required to be interpreted with regard to the vesting of the shares

Kasinath Patel Vs. Radha Bai and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD859; 2005(4)ALT740

original owner of the suit land. He died issueless. According to him, under the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 if a Hindu husband dies issueless, his wife alone succeeds to his estate. As defendant No. 1's husband … Will Ex.B9 as attesting witnesses, only one attesting witness has been examined, and as per the provisions of Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 at least

Kumud Lall versus Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through Lrs and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 5 S.C.R. 301

to what extent.Headnotes†Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - ss.13(7), 2(b)(v) - Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - ss.38(12), 2(5)(vi) - Succession Act, 1925 - s.306 - Legal Representatives Suits Act, 1855 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Ord. 22, r.4 … right to sue for damages of defamation and as this right does 344 [2026] 5 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reportsnot survive his death, his legal representative … heirs. On notice, both wife and son filed applications4 under Order XXII5 Rule 16 and 47 read with Section 1518 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) and Section 229 of 1986 Act, praying to drop

Joti Ram and ors. Vs. Chaman Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 110-A(1) and 306; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : AIR1985P& H2

legal representatives of the deceased plaintiff, the Supreme Court explained the scope of the provisions of s. 306, Succession Act, 1925 and observed that this section expresses a qualification of the maxim act personalis mortar cum persona to the … a Single Bench decision of this Court in Calcutta Insurance Ltd. v. Bhupinder Singh, 1970 Acc. C. J. 344 and the claim petition dismissed vide order dated June 11, 1979.3. Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, learned counsel for the

In Re: Priyambada Debi Birla (Deceased)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 247 and 247(IA);; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 211, 213, 214, 247 and 319;; Chartered Accountants Act, 1942;; Evidence Act - Section 111;; Probate Act, 1857;; Indian Probate and Administration Act, 1881 - Section 34;; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406, 417, 420 and 120B;;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200 and 482;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : (2006)3CALLT547(HC)

of their existence or he deliberately concealed the same. According to him under Section 319 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 the foremost duty of an executor is to acquaint himself with the assets and properties of the deceased … before exercising its jurisdiction has also to be satisfied whether there is necessity for such grant.43. At page 344 of the same Judgment the scope of Section 247 has been explained as I have already observed. It

In Re: Goods of Pasupati Nath Mukerjee

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Reported in : 150Ind.Cas.158

must be relegated to a suit. I shall deal with these points in the order mentioned.(1) Section 104, Succession Act, 1925, comes under Ch. VI of the Act which deals with the construction of wills. It provides that if … 9 C.W.N. 225 : 2 A.L.J. 190 : 8 Sar. 713 : 18 M.L.J. 125 : 3 M.L.T. 344 : 7 C.L.J. 395 : 10 Bom. L.R. 262 (P.C.).28. It was a debt, in my opinion, due

Smt. Meera Bora Vs. Smti. Hira Nath.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 280; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1999 - Rule 14 and 15; Assam Urban Areas Rent Control Act, 1972.

not verified by her, was not in compliance of the mandatory requirements of Section 280 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereafter referred to as the Act). 02. I have heard Mr. KK Mahanta, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. … the order dated 28. 04. 2009 passed by the learned District Judge, Kamrup, Guwahati, in Probate Case No. 344/2007, rejecting the application filed by the present petitioner for Letter of Administration on the ground that the same

Smt. K.C. Gandhi Vs. Controller of Estate Duty

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1991)38ITD378(Ahd.)

the Act says that "the domicile of a person shall be determined as if the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925, on the subject, applied to him". Section 6 of that Act says that a person can have only … yds. in a village Nana Malwa near Rajkot worth Rs. 6000, shares of limited companies valued at Rs. 344, fixed deposits with Banks amounting to Rs. 2,01,439 with accrued interest and readjustment of taxes, balance in some

Mrs. Pushpa Vadera Vs. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Education

Reported in : (1996)87CompCas921

no effect as the will has not been executed and attested in the manner provided under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The witness clause of the will reads as under : "In witness whereof, I have signed this will … matter of K.V. Sasidhar v. Dhanalahshnii Bank Ltd. [1989] 2 Comp LJ 344 (CLB), wherein it was held that even where the directors enjoy a … on March 28, 1990, by Mrs. Pushpa Vadera, an Indian inhabitant (hereinafter referred to as "the appellant") under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956, for issuance of necessary directions to Thomas Cook (India) Limited (hereinafter referred