Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 342 · Page 1 of about 118 results (0.023 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 20 2012

M/S. Sri Gajanan Stores Rep. by Its Managing Partner Sudhakar Phadki, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-20-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

as follows: O.P.No.342 of 1995: This O.P. was filed by the petitioners therein under Section 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short ‘the Act’) for granting probate of the Will, dated 06-08-1993 pertaining to the petition ‘A’ and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2016

Abha Dastane-Rao and Another Vs. Prabhakar Deolankar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-17-2016

Subject : MRTP

their position. If they have chosen not to do so, the consequences are of their own making. Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 301 Removal of executor Petitioner sought to remove first Respondent as executor of Will said to have been … appoint a Receiver of the estate in his hands (Pandurang Shamrao Laud v Dwarkadas Kalliandas, AIR 1933 Bom 342 : 1933 (35) Bom LR 700; Amalnathan, supra).The principles that would apply to a case for appointment of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1968

Bibhuti Bhusan Das Gupta and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-16-1968

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 205, 342, 342A, 537 and 540A

Reported in : AIR1969SC381; 1969CriLJ654; [1969]2SCR104

the ambit of s. III of the Regulation. Since the courts have now ample powers under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the Code of Civil Procedure, these provisions of the Regulation are out of date and should be … Chatterjee next contended that the trial of Bibhuti Dasgupta was illegal as he was not personally examined under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. To appreciate this argument it is necessary to refer to the following

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 17 2020

V. Kalyanaswamy (D) by Lrs. Vs. L. Bakthavatsalam (D) Thr. Lrs. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-17-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

life estate holder. In this context, no doubt, we must clarify one aspect. Section 119 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the “Indian Succession Act’, for short) deals with the date of vesting of legacy

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2007

Chunni Lal and anr. Vs. Vidya Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-12-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 14(1), 14(2), 27 and 39; Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1988; Delhi Shops and Establishment Act; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; ; ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68 and 116; Indian Registration Act, 1908; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : 2007(93)DRJ418

of the deceased owner.13. Learned Counsel for the appellants relied upon the provision of Section 63 ofthe Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Succession Act). The said Section reads as under:63. Execution of unprivileged wills.--Every testator, … single Judge of this Court in Kailash Kumar and Ors. v. Dr. R.P. apur : 54 (1994) DLT 342, which has succinctly set out the principles as regards sub-letting. It was held that no two cases are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 1978

Mahamaya Dassi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-16-1978

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 26, 161, 164, 168 and 256; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 247

Reported in : [1980]126ITR748(Cal)

order to examine this question, it may be relevant to refer to the relevant provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.18. Section 2 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, provides the definition and Sub-clause (a) of Section 2 defines … 247 of the Succession Act. In the case of Pandurang Shamrao Laud v. Dwarkadas Kalliandas, AIR 1933 Bom 342, the Bombay High Court held that the position of an administrator pendents lite was similar to that of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 1950

V.M. Raghavalu Naidu and Sons by Executors, C.G. Krishnaswami Naidu an ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-02-1950

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 3, 10, 41 and 41(1)

Reported in : AIR1950Mad790; [1950]18ITR787(Mad); (1950)IIMLJ300

and when the executors of a will have become trustees and the legatees have become beneficiaries.18. Chapter 7, Succession Act, 1925, succinctly defines the duties of executors. Shortly stated it is their duty to clear the estate to pay … to the bequest of a residue as the residue only comes into existence when the administration is completed.' Section 342, Succession Act enjoins that the executor, when there is a general legacy to be paid at a future

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2012

Harsh Vardhan Lodha and Others Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and Others

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-23-2012

Subject : Right to Information

AIR 1933 Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun and ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas and ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held that - the position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2012

Harsh Vardhan Lodha and ors. Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-23-2012

Subject : Education

h) AIR 193.Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun & ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas & ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held thatthe position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of a receiver,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 1961

Sm. Prova Debi Vs. Mrs. Fernandes

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-04-1961

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 205(1), 342, 540A and 540A(1)

Reported in : AIR1962Cal203,66CWN577

not absent during the examination under Section 342 Cr. P. C.49. In 1925, in the case of 29 Cal WN 939: (AIR 1926 Cal 430) … No useful purpose will be served by tracing here the history of the examination of an accused in successive Codes--of 1861 (Act XXV), of 1869 (Act VIII), of 1872 (Act X), of 1882 Act X). Section 342 … Sri R.N. Banerjee, Magistrate, 1st Class for disposal. When the stage arrived for examination of the accused under Section 342 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the learned Magistrate directed the petitioner Prova Debi to appear in person, observing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial