Advanced Search Results

Kiran Arora Vs. Ram Parkash Arora and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195(1); Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 193; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276

Reported in : AIR1980Delhi99; ILR1980Delhi61

195(1)(b)(ii) & 340--Criminal Procedure Code (1898), Sections 195(1)(c) & 476--Indian Penal Code, Sections 193, 196, 467 & 471--Indian Succession Act (1925), Section 276.; Smt. Kiran Arora was married to Chand Kiran Arora and out of he wedlock a son and

Shri Prem Prakash Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222, 228, 276, 276(1), 280, 281 and 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 467 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 340

Reported in : 118(2005)DLT681; 2005(81)DRJ157

that the verification of the petition by the attesting witness in compliance with Section 281 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 shows that Pehlad, one of the two attesting witnesses did not verify the petition but signed the same … accordance with the Will, I hold that its effect is nil.61. During arguments, objectors filed an application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. It was taken in Court. In sum and substance, it is stated in the application that the

Sharda Devi Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195, 195(1), 340 and 482; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276

which is copy of plaint under probate case No. 22 of 2003 under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, filed by the petitioner Sharda Devi in the Court of District Judge, Saran at Chapra praying for grant … concerned or some other public servant to whom he is administratively subordinate. The learned counsel also referred to Section 340 of the Code which provides that when upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise

Syed Askari Hadi Ali Augustine Imam and anr. Vs. State (Delhi Admn.) a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 63 and 276; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 8, 8(1), 40 to 43 and 68; Probate and Administration Act, 1881 - Sections 12 and 59; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 227 and 273; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 420, 444, 448 and 468; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 300, 309, 340(1), 341, 343(2); Constitution of India - Article 136; ; ;

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW3251; AIR2009SC3232; JT2009(4)SC522; 2009(3)SCALE604; (2009)5SCC528; 2009AIRSCW3251; 2009(2)LHSC961; [2009] 3 SCR 1017

administrator : vide Sections 12 and 59, Probate and Administration Act, 1881, corresponding to Sections 227 and 273, Succession Act, 1925, which now incorporates that Act, Section 41, Evidence Act etc: Babu Lal v. Hari Bakhsh (1918) 13 P.R. … wherein it was held:24. There is another consideration which has to be kept in mind. Sub-section (1) of Section 340 CrPC contemplates holding of a preliminary enquiry. Normally, a direction for filing of a complaint is not made

Geej Raj Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1982CriLJ2079; 1982()WLN91

leading to this appeal are that the appellant Gees Raj submitted an application under Section 282 of the Succession Act, 1925, r/w Section 193, I.P.C, and Section 340, Cr. P.C. against non-applicant Kishan Dev for prosecuting the non-applicant under

Sudhir Sehgal vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

due execution and attestation of the Will in question in terms of the Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 has to be done, which provides to the effect : - “63(c) The Will shall be attested by … complaint, the application bearing M. No.49/2009 in CRL.M.C. 5247/2015 Page 3 of 33 Probate Case No.317/1994 (134/93) under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was moved on behalf of the legal representative of the respondent

Balbir Sher Gill vs.state of Delhi & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

document claimed to be the Will have been unable to prove the same. Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, while prescribing the mode of execution of unprivileged Wills, prescribes: Test.Cas.94/2008 Page 13 of 22 (i) that the … to also address on as to why prosecution of the petitioner of the offences committed by him, under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) be not ordered.25. The counsel for the petitioner only states

Mahashakti Peeth Religious Endowment Trust Vs. Shelendra Pratap Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Family

Reported in : RLW2009(3)Raj2490

Dalip Singh, J.1. This misc. appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 24.2.2006 passed by the learned District Judge, Jaipur … filed by Ramanand on behalf of the appellant Trust Maha Shakti Peeth, an application purporting to be under Section 340 Cr.P.C. came to be filed on or about 24.8.2004 by one Sitaramdas Swami claiming himself to be the

S.V.R. Saroja and Others Vs. S.V. Matha Prasad

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890; Indina Lunacy Act, 1912; the Indian Successions Act, 1925; the Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955; the Indian Trusts … the Indian Companies Act, 1913, the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890; Indina Lunacy Act, 1912; the Indian Successions Act, 1925; the Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955; the Indian Trusts Act, 1882;'the Arbitration Act, 1940; the Powers of … of the learned Master. 7. The respondent herein viz., S.V.Mathaprasad had filed the Application No.4969 of 2014 under Section 340 r/w 195(b)(ii) and (iii) of Cr.P.C. It is alleged by the respondent in the said petition that the

Balan Vs. Sivagiri Sree Narayana Dharma Sanghom Trust

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala High Court Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 5, 7, 207 and 207(1); Delhi High Court Act - Sections 10(1); Madhya Pradesh Letters Patent Act; Bombay Letters Patent Act; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9), 2(14), 23(3), 24, 104, 105, 141 and 151; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 17B; Patna Letters Patent Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 107 and 223; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 225, 227 and 228; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 299; Delhi Rent Control Act; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 39 and 108; Agriculturists Debt Relief Act, 1958 - Sections 7; Patents Act - Sections 104; Specific Relief Act - Sections 8; Karnataka High Court Act - Sections 4; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 54; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections

Reported in : AIR2006Ker58; 2006(4)CTC273; [2006(2)JCR94]; 2005(4)KLT865

even though an order passed by a single Judge of the High Court under Section 299 of the Succession Act, 1925 is not strictly a decree, it will come within the scope of judgment under Letters Patent Clause 15. … Section 5 (i) of the High Court Act against an interim order passed by a single Judge under Section 340 of Cr.P.C. At paragraph 10, it is observed as follows:'10. After hearing both sides, we are of the