Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 33a · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.015 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 25 1944

Arulayi Vs. Antonimuthu Nadan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-25-1944

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1945Mad47

is very help, ful. The preamble states:Whereas it is expedient to amend the provisions of Section 33, Indian Succession Act, 1925, so as to provide more liberally for the surviving widow or husband where there are no lineal descendants … 1. The main question arising for decision in this second appeal is whether the provisions of Section 33A(1) of Act 39 of 1923, the Succession Act apply to this case so as to benefit the appellant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2016

Shirish Popatlal Shah Vs. Arun Popatlal Shah

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-08-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

A Will is proved if it meets the requirements of Sections 59, 61 and 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 59 says that a Will can be validly made by any adult of sound mind. The testamentary or … Caveat dated 14th February 2005 (Paperbook, p. 30)and an Affidavit in Support dated 21st February 2005 (Paperbook, p. 33a).The Petition was then renumbered as Testamentary Suit No. 20 of 2005. 3. Before I go further, I should

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2016

Jai Ganesh SRA CHS (Prop.) and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-28-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

and any subsistence grant or allowance made to any such servant while under suspension; (m) an expectancy of succession by survivorship or other merely contingent or possible right or interest; (n) a right to future maintenance; (o) … (k) all compulsory deposits and other sums in or derived from any fund to which the Provident Funds Act, 1925 (19 of 1925), for the time being applies, in so far as they are declared by the said … municipal or cantonment areas Nothing in section 31 to 32R (both inclusive) 33A, 33B, 33C and 43 shall apply to lands in the areas within … the provisions of the Slum Act will prevail over the provisions of section 36A of the MLR Code insofar as there is any conflict between

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 08 2018

b.c. Singh (D) by Lrs. Vs. j.m. Utarid (D) by Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-08-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Udarid and grandson of Dr. M.B. Utarid. Dr. S.L. Singh is admittedly an Indian Christian. Therefore, the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short ‘the Act’) would be applicable to the succession of the property left by her. This Act … widow and no kindred.-.Where the intestate has left a widow- 7 (a) ……..; (b) [save as provided by section 33A]., if he has left no lineal descendant, but has left persons who are of kindred to him, one-half

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1981

H. L. Vs. Matheson

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-23-1981

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court will decide a future case concerning this or a similar statute, and goes on to forecast a successful challenge on the merits. Today, of course, the Court's function is to decide only the question properly presented … this decision. [ Footnote 3 ] While still in the first trimester of her pregnancy, appellant instituted this action in the Third Judicial District Court of Utah. [ Footnote 4 ] She sought a declaration that § … (1978), he refused to perform the abortion without first notifying appellant's parents. Section 76-7-304, enacted in 1974, provides: "To enable the physician to exercise his

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1955

Ram Manohar Lohia and ors. Vs. V.S. Sundaram

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Apr-26-1955

Subject : Criminal

of Civil Procedure, the Transfer of Property Act, the Legal Practitioners Act, the Suits Valuation Act, the Indian Succession Act and others were not extended to Manipur. It is thus clear that the. Code of Criminal Procedure cannot … 422 (Y); 'Vasant B. Kale v. Emperor' AIR 1934 Bom 375 (Z); 'Ashutosh Roy v. Haris Chandra' AIR 1925 Cal 625 (Zl); 'Satish Chandra Roy v. Emperor', 11 Cal WN 79 (Z2) and 'Sat Narain v. Emperor' … of public meetings was prohibited by an order on the analogy of Section 144, Criminal P. C, dated 17-12-1954, passed i by the District Magistrate,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial