Advanced Search Results

R. Rama Subbarayalu Reddiar Vs. Rengammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 265; ;Madras Civil Courts Act, 1873 - Sections 29(1); Indian Succession Act, 1925

Reported in : AIR1962Mad450

They are (1) By virtue of a notification made by this Court under Sec. 265 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, all subordinate Judges in the Madras Province have been appointed as ex officio District delegates under that enactment … in ILR 55 Mad 701: IR 1932 Mad 456. That was a case relating to a petition under Section 192 of the Indian Succession Act. It was contended @herein that the notification made under Sec. 29(1) of … In Craies on Statute Law (5th Edn) it is stated at page 339:'Where a new Act is couched in general affirmative language and the previous

Emperor Vs. Abdul Satar Ilahibax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1907)9BOMLR30

are not voluntarily continued by the persons accused of the obstruction throughout the time obstruction lasts. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … private right of way as is specially exempted from the operation of Section 341 by the exception to Section 339, Indian Penal Code, defining wrongful restraint. The accused throughout set up a private title to the land, negativing

R. Rama Subbarayalu Reddiar Vs. Rengammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1962)2MLJ318

are : (1) By virtue of a notification made by this Court under Section 265 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, all Subordinate Judges in the Madras Province have been appointed as ex offico District Delegates under that enactment … latter to all the other matters. In Craises on Statute Law (5th Edition), it is stated at page 339:Where a new Act is couched in general affirmative language and the previous law can well stand with it,

Bhagvan Manaji Marwadi Vs. Hiraji Premaji Marwadi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1932Bom516; (1932)34BOMLR1112; 140Ind.Cas.519

lie only incases of fraud and collusion-Indian Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 183-Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925), Section 214 (b)-Arbitration-Reference by one partner-Award not binding on other partners.;An application made under Order XXI, Rule 50, of … the other partners. See Dooly Chand v. Musaji (1916) 25 C.L. J. 339 and Gopal Das v. Baij Nath I.L.R. (1925) All. 23911. Under Order … Chhaganlal cannot recover the amount without the production of a succession certificate under Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act; secondly, that the application under Order XXI, Rule 50, Clause (2), is not within time; and thirdly, the

N. Renuka Devi Vs. E. Lalitha and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

out of the above said decisions, it is necessary to take notice of the relevant provisions in the Succession Act, 1925. Section 266 of the Act provides that the District Judge shall have, in relation to the granting of Probate … 32. Similarly in P.M.Latha Vs. State of Kerala (2003 (3) SCC 541 : 2003 SCC (L and S) 339) (vide SCC p.546, para 13) this Court observed : "13. Equity and law are twin brothers and law

In Re: Laurence Claude Levack

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 228, 237, 238, 239, 241, 276 and 276(1)

Reported in : AIR1954Mad898; (1954)IIMLJ249

security being furnished. Family - exemption - Sections 228, 237, 238, 239, 241, 276 and 276 (1) of Succession Act, 1925 - Section 291 (1) exempts person to whom letters of administration are granted under Section 241 from giving … at any time present, or the person is only temporarily not present.In -- 'Ashbury v. Eilis', 1893 AC 339 (B) the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council had to construe the word 'absent' which occurred in a

Ramaswami Gounder Vs. Ramaswami Gounder and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : (1972)1MLJ417

Natesa and the first defendant is a vested remainder within the meaning of Section 119 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Incidentally we may straightaway dispose of a minor contention that there were no specific terms of bequest in … 1928) executed by Sowbagyammal and the plaintiff in favour of Natesa Goundar for Rs. 1,389 in all, Rs. 339 received on several occasions for family expenses and Rs. 1,050 an oral loan taken from the promisee Natesa

Saraswathi R. Rai Vs. Korapalu

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Aliyasanthana Law

Reported in : ILR1992KAR416; 1991(3)KarLJ283

in view and also the Rules of Construction of Wills as incorporated in Chapter VI of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, we proceed to consider the will in question.8. We have reproduced above several relevant portions of the will … circumstances; and, when this is the case, those circumstances should be taken into consideration. As laid down by Section 82, Succession Act, the meaning of any clause in a will is to be collected from the entire … in Venkata Narasimha v. Parthasarathy, 41 I.A. 51 at p.70: (21 I.C. 339 P.C.)'the Courts are entitled and bound to bear in mind other matters

Gomi Bai and ors. Vs. Uma Rastogi and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 8, Rule 5(3); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 15, 19, 20 and 22(1); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 54; Evidence Act - Sections 102

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD631

person.54. General Clauses Act, 1897 also does not define the term 'representative in interest' or 'legal representative'. Indian Succession Act, 1925 also does not define these terms. In Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 the term 'legal representative' is defined … contract is enforceable. Beaumont C.J. in Vishweshwar v. Durgappa, AIR 1940 Bom 339 held that both under the common law as well as under Section … as 'representative of interest' of her husband and therefore suit by her as nominee is maintainable as per Section 15 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The respondents/ defendants did not deny the factum of nomination and

Dennis Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Education

U.S. at 268 U. S. 673 , in the Gitlow case in 1925 with the setting of events in this case in 1950. "It does … criminal jurisprudence. See American Communications Assn. v. Douds, 339 U. S. 382 , 339 U. S. 411 … here, advocate, and the general goal of the Party was, during the period in question, to achieve a successful overthrow of the existing order by force and violence. Page 341 U. S. 499 I It will be … CIRCUIT Syllabus 1. As construed and applied in this case, §§ 2(a)(1), 2(a)(3) and 3 of the Smith Act, 54 Stat. 671, making it a crime for any person knowingly or willfully to advocate the overthrow or … the instant case, violates the First and Fifth Amendments because of indefiniteness. Sections 2 and 3 of the Smith Act, 54 Stat. 671, 18 U.S.C.