Advanced Search Results

Virbhadrappa Shilvant Vs. Shekabai Harun Sayed Ahmed Arab

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1939Bom188; (1939)41BOMLR249

Section 32 of the Administrator-General's Act, 1913, or a succession certificate granted under Part X of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, or a certificate granted under the Succession Certificate Act of 1889, and having the debt specified therein. Unless … expressed in Khurshetbibi v. Keso Vinayek I.L.R. (1887) Bom. 101 and Davalava v. Bhimaji Dhondo I.L.R. (1895) Bom. 338. In the latter case upon a review of authorities Ranade J. came to the conclusion that the heirs

Nanda Kishore Mohapatra and ors. Vs. Binayak Mishra and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; Orissa Civil Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 18 and 299; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 388(1) and 388(2)

Reported in : 89(2000)CLT438; 2000(I)OLR92

by the petitioners, Binayak Mishra, O.P. No. 1 herein, instituted a proceeding Under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter called 'the Act') before the District Judge, Puri, for grant of Letters of Administration in respect of … The further argument of the O.P. No. 1 is that as per the proviso to Sub-section (2) of Section 338 of the Act, since an appeal lies from the order of an inferior Court, the impugned order of

Keshao Raghunath Deosant and ors. Vs. Waman Keshao Deosani and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 54 - Order 20, Rule 18, 18(1) and 18(2) - Order 26, Rules 13 and 14; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1971Bom26; (1971)73BOMLR820; 1970MhLJ801

F.B. : S.C. [1945] A.I.R. Bom. 338, followed.;Tikaram v. Hansraj [1954] A.I.R. Nag. 241, referred to. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth Annamalai Vs. Mrs. Valliammai Achi, W/O of Late Dr. Al ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : T.N. Court-fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Schedule - Sections 55, 56, 61 and 63 - Articles 1 to 6, 7, 11(K); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222, 261, 264, 265, 266, 268, 276, 284, 295 and 299; High Court Original Side Rules - Order 25, Rules 4, 25, 55, 689, 690 and 692; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 235; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). 1908 - Sections 26, 75 to 78, 86, 87-B, 90 to 92, 94, 95, 100, 104, 141 and 144 - Order 41 Rule 1; Original Side Rules, 1956 - Order 2, Rules 2, 20 to 50, 51 to 68; Government of India Act, 1915; Indian Oaths Act, 1873; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Parition Act, 1893; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890; Indian Divorce Act,1869; Specific Relief Act, 1877; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940; Indian Stamp Act, 1899;

Reported in : AIR1991Mad284

the plaintiff filed the O. P. No. 197 of 1988 under Ss. 222 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with O. XXV, Rule 4 of the Original Side Rules. In the said petition, the petitioner sought … Schedule I of the Tamil Nadu Court-fees Act could not be made applicable because in a preceding under Section 295 of the Indian Succession Act properties were not the subject matter of the dispute. The matter under … decision reported in P. Natarajan v. R. Par-thasarathy and others 1973 T.L.N.J. 338.'As per R. 58 of the O. XXV of the Original Side Rules,

Kartick Das Vs. Sri Kamal Ghosh and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 98, 99, 100 and 101 - Order 22, Rules 4A and 5; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 13, 14 and 17(2); ;Hindu Succession Act - Section 30

Reported in : (2004)1CALLT600(HC)

which is capable of being so disposed of by him, in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (39 of 1925), or any other law for the time being in force and applicable to Hindus.Explanation.--The interest … made defendant. In September 1988 said Lakshmi Rani Dutta entered appearance in the suit arid filed applications under Section 17(2) and Section 17(2)(a)(b) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act. She did not however file any Written … July 1988 the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed Title Suit No. 338/88 in the Court of learned 2nd Munsif at Alipur against one Lakshmi

Smt. Radhamma and ors. Vs. H.N. Muddukrishna and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4(1), 14 and 30; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 281A, 281A(1) and 281A(3); Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 35(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; Indian Succession Act, 1925; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR2006Kant68; 2006(1)KarLJ176

which is capable of being so disposed of by him, in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (39 of 1925) or any other law for the time being in force and applicable to Hindus.Explanation.--The interest … plaint is hit by provisions of Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988?2. Whether defendant 2(e) proves that provisions of Section 14 of Hindu Succession Act is a bar to maintain plea against Schedule 'H' of plaint?12. R.F.A. No. … Smt. Chinnamma and Ors. v. Devanga Sangha and Ors. AIR 1973 Mys. 338 (DB);(8) Baliram Atmaram Kelapure v. Smt. Indirabai and Ors. : AIR1996SC2024 ;

Fgp Ltd. Vs. Saleh Hooseini Doctor and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : TenancyContract

Acts : Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; Bombay Rent Act, 1947; Special Marriage Act; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 21, 105, 211, 213, 213(2), 216, 222, 232 and 234; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53A; Income-tax Act - Sections 230A; Transfer of Property (Amendment) Act, 1929; Evidence Act - Sections 116; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(11); Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2010(1)ALT3(SC); JT2009(12)SC210; RLW2010(1)SC434; 2009(12)SCALE516; (2009)10SCC223; 2009(9)LC4445(SC); 2009AIRSCW6026; 2009(5)LHSC3282

21 of the said Act, the property of the parties shall be regulated under the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925. It was further urged that as a result of the necessary corollary of the same, the provisions of … registration, be deemed to be a marriage solemnized under the said Act and as a consequence thereof under Section 21 of the said Act, the property of the parties shall be regulated under the provisions of Indian

Chandra Kishore Dikshit Son of Sri Kewal Krishna Dikshit Alias Babu Ra ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : FamilyLimitation

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 47, 57, 276, 278, 278(1) and 298; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 2 - Schedule - Article 137; Limitation Rules - Rules 7 and 39; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 181

Reported in : AIR2006All86

made in the suit. The Court also declines to exercise its discretion under Section 298 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 to grant the relief.28. The Suit is dismissed. The defendant shall be entitled to the cost of the

C S Aggarwal vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Test.Cas.8/1995 Page 31 of 82 Principles relating to mode of proving a will 25. Section 63 of the Succession Act, 1925 provides that a will has to be attested by two or more witnesses, each of whom has seen … in question is encircled by suspicious circumstances. (Emphasis supplied) 35. In Raja Ram Singh v. Arjun Singh, AIR2002Delhi 338, the Division Bench of this Court following Jaswant Kaur (supra) held that if the propounder has taken prominent

Tirith Kumar & Ors. versus Daduram & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.665

x x 56. I would hold that the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and the Indian Succession Act, 1925 though in terms, would not apply to the Scheduled Tribes, the general principles contained therein being consistent with … the High Court in overturning the findings returned by the Courts below is that: 2.6.1 The Court noticed Section 2 (2) of the HSA, 1956 and the judgment of this Court in Madhu Kishwar & Ors. v. … the issue of public notification in respect of Scheduled Tribes. Under Article 338(3), it is provided that references to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes