Advanced Search Results

Mohinder Lal and ors. Vs. Tule Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 106 and 113; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 337

Reported in : AIR2006HP103,2006(2)ShimLC142

a legacy is twelve years from the date when the legacy becomes deliverable. Section 337 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 says that an executor is not bound to pay or deliver any legacy until the expiration of one

S. Thimmappa and anr. Vs. Gopiamma

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 337; Limitation Act - Sections 12, 14 and 339

Reported in : AIR1964Kant276; AIR1964Mys276

arisen for claiming the annuity due in the year 1957 in view of Section 337 of the Indian Succession Act. 4. The Courts below were not correct in opining that O. S. No. 136/57 is a continuation of

Navnitlal Sakarlal Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Gujarat I

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957

Reported in : [1977]106ITR512(Guj)

Tribunal. The Tribunal, after analysing the provisions of the will and discussing the relevant provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the Act, held that the estate of deceased Balabhai vested absolutely in specified shares in the two … he is not bound to do so until the expiration of one year from the testator's death (vide section 337). In the other case, that is where by the terms of a bequest the legatee is not entitled

Simanapalli Rama Rao (Died) Per Lrs and ors. Vs. G. Kamalamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 141 and 337

Reported in : 1993(1)ALT696; II(1993)DMC246

as executors, they are not entitled to take the bequest in view of Section 141 of the Indian Succession Act (for short 'the Act'). In that view, the learned District Judge allowed the appeals decreeing the suits filed … on the ground that he has not paid the amount of Rs. 2,000/- to each of the sisters. Section 337 of the Act says that the executor or administrator of the Will is not bound to pay or

Emperor Vs. Nandkishorsinh Gayaprasad

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1937)39BOMLR616

a public place, but had done so only to a selected customer by a private arrangement. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … a selected customer, and that too not in a public place.;Emperor v. Ganesh Ramchandra (1930) 32 Bom, L.R. 337, Local Fund Overseer, Uayavamm v. Pakkirisami Thevan (1927) I.L.R. 51 Mad. 527 and Sardul Singh v. The Crown

Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth Annamalai Vs. Mrs. Valliammai Achi, W/O of Late Dr. Al ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : T.N. Court-fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Schedule - Sections 55, 56, 61 and 63 - Articles 1 to 6, 7, 11(K); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222, 261, 264, 265, 266, 268, 276, 284, 295 and 299; High Court Original Side Rules - Order 25, Rules 4, 25, 55, 689, 690 and 692; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 235; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). 1908 - Sections 26, 75 to 78, 86, 87-B, 90 to 92, 94, 95, 100, 104, 141 and 144 - Order 41 Rule 1; Original Side Rules, 1956 - Order 2, Rules 2, 20 to 50, 51 to 68; Government of India Act, 1915; Indian Oaths Act, 1873; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Parition Act, 1893; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890; Indian Divorce Act,1869; Specific Relief Act, 1877; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940; Indian Stamp Act, 1899;

Reported in : AIR1991Mad284

the plaintiff filed the O. P. No. 197 of 1988 under Ss. 222 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with O. XXV, Rule 4 of the Original Side Rules. In the said petition, the petitioner sought … Schedule I of the Tamil Nadu Court-fees Act could not be made applicable because in a preceding under Section 295 of the Indian Succession Act properties were not the subject matter of the dispute. The matter under … our High Court reported in Jayalakshmi v. S. Krishnaswamy 1990 M L.W. 337 in which our High Court held as follows :--'Para-17 : In an

Joginder Pal Vs. Indian Red Cross Society and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Succession Act, 1952 - Sections 372 and 387; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : (2000)125PLR280

him. His contention is that the application for succession certificate was filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and has contended that proceedings for the grant of succession certificate are sum mary proceedings and are not … the will and the succession certificate which clinched the matter. A reference was also made to (1995-3)111 P.L.R. 337, Mahant Brahm Dass v. Mahant Sarju Dass in which case similar observations were made. The facts of both

V.K.S. Bawa Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1996)56ITD232(Delhi)

completion of the administration of the will. Our attention was also invited to Section 211 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in support of the contention that the property vests in the executor though he is not the owner … deceased person till the property is distributed amongst the legatees. Reference was also made to Sections 119,327,332,333,336 & 337 of the Indian Succession Act in support of the contention that the executor/administrator is bound to deliver the

Smt. Pramila Devi Vs. M Sathyanarayana

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the executant, Thammaiah, and Pillanna. The evidence of DW.3 satisfies the requirements of Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the very finding of the trial Court that the Will is shrouded with suspicious circumstances is erroneous. … Court in the case of THAYYIL MAMMO AND ANOTHER v. KOTTIATH RAMUNNI AND OTHERS reported in AIR1966Supreme Court 337 and brought to my notice para No.9 of the said judgment, wherein the Apex Court has referred to

Sm. Daljit Kaur, B.A., B.T. Vs. S. Tarlok Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 192, 209 and 299

Reported in : AIR1953All707

4. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Civil - dismissal of application - Sections 192 and 209 of Succession Act, 1925 - appellant filed an application under Section 192 with District Judge, Rampur - appeal dismissed on the ground … Section 209 and are not subject to appeal or review. In -- 'Gajadhar v. Megha', AIR 1922 All 337 (3) (A), it was held that an order appointing a curator was not appealable by reason of the