Advanced Search Results

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … (1997 ) 9 SCC 450, and R.S. Raghunath v. State of Karnataka and anr. - (1992) 1 SCC 335). 25. In the case of Municipal Council, Palia vs. T.J. Joseph (supra), the Supreme Court has indicated that

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … (1997 ) 9 SCC 450, and R.S. Raghunath v. State of Karnataka and anr. - (1992) 1 SCC 335). 25. In the case of Municipal Council, Palia vs. T.J. Joseph (supra), the Supreme Court has indicated that

Adeline Maude Ellanor Catchick Nee Robertson and anr. Vs. Sunderlal Da ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 307, 332, 333 and 335; ; Succession Act, 1865 - Section 269

Reported in : AIR1950Cal559

[10] of 1865). The section, practically corresponds to Section 307 of the present Succession Act, XXXIX [39] of 1925. In the present case, the will and codicil do not impose any restriction on the powers of the … also to mortgage her life-estate.52. Reference was made to Sections 332, 333, 335, Succession Act, and it was urged that assent of the executors to … realised and if so, when. No inventory or account which was required to in filed under Section 317, Succession Act, by the executrix, has been produced.24. The testamentary expenses would be a fairly large sum. The pecuniary legacies

In Re: the Goods of Late Ravinder Kumar

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 225; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 9 and 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148 and 149; Sucession Act, 1925 - Sections 276 and 278

Reported in : AIR2004All46

Sri J. Nagar that the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure save as otherwise provided in the Indian Succession Act, 1925 have been made applicable to the proceedings in relation to the grant of probate and Letters of Administration.10. … of court-fee.55. In Indian Statistical Institute v. Associated Builders, AIR 1978 SC 335, their Lordships of the Supreme Court held as follows (paragraph 13 of … the Court has power to enlarge the period for payment of Court-fee in view of the provisions of Section 148 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is further submitted by Sri J. Nagar that the provisions

Babu Lal Grand Sons Family Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1989)31ITD52(Delhi)

and therefore, in view of Section 14 of the Transfer, of Property Act, 1908 and Section 114 of Succession Act, 1925, the tying-up of property beyond the minority of the persons to whom the Trust created belonged, was against … High Court in the case of CIT v. Trustees of Anupam Charitable Trust [1987] 167 ITR 129/31 Taxman 335 to say that the error envisaged by Section 263, was not one which depended on possibilities or guess

Rajinder Mehra vs.rajesh Tuli and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Subject :-"Substitution on the basis of Letter of Administration granted by the Court under Section 276 of Indian Succession Act 1925. Office Order No.3/89 Date 15.02.1989 It has been observed that in certain cases the lessee leave behind a … % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:7. h August, 2018 FAO(OS) 335/2016 RAJINDER MEHRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Arvind Bhatt and Mr.Kuber Giri, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus RAJESH TULI

Rajinder Mehra vs.rajesh Tuli and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Subject :-"Substitution on the basis of Letter of Administration granted by the Court under Section 276 of Indian Succession Act 1925. Office Order No.3/89 Date 15.02.1989 It has been observed that in certain cases the lessee leave behind a … % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:7. h August, 2018 FAO(OS) 335/2016 RAJINDER MEHRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Arvind Bhatt and Mr.Kuber Giri, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus RAJESH TULI

Kumud Lall versus Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through Lrs and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 5 S.C.R. 301

to what extent.Headnotes†Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - ss.13(7), 2(b)(v) - Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - ss.38(12), 2(5)(vi) - Succession Act, 1925 - s.306 - Legal Representatives Suits Act, 1855 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Ord. 22, r.4 … for professional negligence against a 34 (1988) 1 SCC 556[2026] 5 S.C.R. 335 Kumud Lall v. Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through Lrs and Otherslawyer for … heirs. On notice, both wife and son filed applications4 under Order XXII5 Rule 16 and 47 read with Section 1518 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) and Section 229 of 1986 Act, praying to drop

Nahar Hirasingh and ors. Vs. Mst. DukalhIn and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 158, 164, 164(1) and 164(2); Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 4(2) and 14

Reported in : AIR1974MP141; 1974MPLJ257

the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, or any other personal law, such as the Moham-madan Law or the Indian Succession Act, 1925, will be applicable.23. The real difficulty that we are finding in accepting the view of the Division Bench … a Bhumiswami under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959, is a tenure holder within the meaning of Section 4 of the Hindu Succession Act. 1956. That question is also involved in Second Appeal No. 91 of … namely, Tare, J. and the other is Gopikabai v. Bajva, 1971 MPLJ 335, decided by Shiv Dayal, J. In 1971 MPLJ 172 (supra), Tare, J.,

Sh. K.C. Bajaj and ors. Vs. Smt. Sudershan Kumari and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 59, 63 and 276; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68

Reported in : 149(2008)DLT694

Smt. Usha Bajaj (hereinafter referred to as the propounder) filed a petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 seeking probate of a will dated 02.11.1977 purportedly executed by the testatrix. Inter alia, to establish that the … bank account at Bombay. He admitted that the rental income of the testatrix was never less than Rs. 335/- per month. He maintained that since the year 1950 the testatrix was suffering from black cataract of both