Advanced Search Results

Ramani U. Krishnan Vs. Dr. Ammini Praveen Joshua @ Veena

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263 and 283(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54

Reported in : AIR2005Mad423; 2005(2)CTC262; (2005)2MLJ364

of 1999 under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act,1925 and Order XXV Rule 62 of the Original Side Rules. The respondent herein filed the said O.P. No. … of testator.17. In the case of D.L. Rajasekaran (died) and Ors. v. Ayyavu reported in 1995 (2) MLJ 334 it is held that a person, not claiming any right under testator, nor a beneficiary of Will, nor

N. Namberumal Chetti Vs. Veeraperumal Pillai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1930Mad956; (1930)59MLJ596

the legacy as administrator of Aparanji's estate, from establishing his claim to the legacy?13. Section 213 (1), Indian Succession Act, 1925, says:No right as executor or legatee can be established in any Court of Justice, unless a Court of … Graham v. Drummond (1896) 1 Ch. 968 and Taylor v. Hawkins (1803) 8 Ves. Jun. 209: 32 E.R. 334 held that an alienee with notice of the fact that the executor was using it for his own

Kumud Lall versus Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through Lrs and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 5 S.C.R. 301

to what extent.Headnotes†Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - ss.13(7), 2(b)(v) - Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - ss.38(12), 2(5)(vi) - Succession Act, 1925 - s.306 - Legal Representatives Suits Act, 1855 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Ord. 22, r.4 … the plaintiff respondent which his legal representative is33 (1986) 1 SCC 118 334 [2026] 5 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports entitled to uphold and defend and … heirs. On notice, both wife and son filed applications4 under Order XXII5 Rule 16 and 47 read with Section 1518 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) and Section 229 of 1986 Act, praying to drop

Ramautar Vs. Ram Naresh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : FamilyCivil

Reported in : 2009(3)MPHT340

be proved only by examining an attesting witness to the Will. According to Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (in short 'the Act of 1925') the Will is required to be attested by two or more witnesses, … on Single Bench decision of this Court Illyas and Ors. v. Badshah alias Kamla : AIR 1990 MP 334.10. On the other hand, Shri L.S. Baghel, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1/plaintiff argued in

The Chairman, A.P.S.R.T.C., Hyderabad Vs. Shafiya Khatoon and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1A, 4 and 4A

Reported in : AIR1985AP83

to his legal representatives under the Legal Representatives Suits Act. 1855 read with S. 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The corresponding law in England in this regard is the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act. 1934. The Indian … Jokhiram v. Naresh Kantha, , Damayant Devi v. Sita Devi, 1972 ACCC.J. 334 (Punj & Har) and by a Division Bench of the karnatka High … the dependency is to be made between the wife, husband, parent and child, if any, of the deceased. Section 4 of the said Act states the word 'parent' shall include the father, mother, grandfather and grandmother and

Ravi Shanker Lakhanlal Mishra and anr. Vs. Rajendra Kumar Dubey and an ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act - Sections 68

Reported in : 1999(2)MPLJ281

marked as Ex.P/1-C has not been duly proved as per the requirement of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act. It has been submitted in the above context that the … of the testator. Similar proposition find place in Illyas and other v. Badshah alias Kamla, AIR 1990 MP 334 and T. Venkat Sitaram Rao and Anr. v. T. Kamakshiamma and Ors., AIR 1978 Orissa 145.16. Now in

G. Gopal and Etc. Vs. G. Nagarathinam and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 71, 263 and 283

Reported in : AIR2007Mad28

ORDERR. Banumathi, J.1. The Applicant/Third Party has filed this Application to revoke the Grant or Probate dated 5 8 2002 of the Will dated 25-12-1984 in T.O.S. No. 32 of 1999.2. For better appreciation of the...

Harish Brijmohan Loyalka and Another Vs. Dileep Balkrishna Nevatia

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

amended Petition, there is no averment sufficient to comply with the provisions of Section 237 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. That Section reads thus:“237. Probate of copy or draft of lost Will. —When a Will has been lost … Ors., (AIR 2009 Delhi 21) and Nand Lal v Vidya Devi and Ors. (2009 (1) Shim L C 334).11. There is a further obstacle in Mr. Nevatias way. The petition is never a ‘pleading properly so-called. Indeed,

Indranil Chakravarti & Anr vs.the State Nct of Delhi Through of Se ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Page 1 of 4 FAO No.175/2017 1. By this first appeal filed under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, appellants who were the petitioners in the succession certificate case, seek for setting aside of the impugned judgment … just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.14993/2017 (for delay) This is an application seeking condonation of 334 days delay in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the application the same is allowed and

Rajinder Mehra vs.rajesh Tuli and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Administration of the property and the Executor/Administrator till he executes an assent deed under Section 333 and 334 of the Indian Succession Act 1925. this office mutate the name of the property in The matter has, … Subject :-"Substitution on the basis of Letter of Administration granted by the Court under Section 276 of Indian Succession Act 1925. Office Order No.3/89 Date 15.02.1989 It has been observed that in certain cases the lessee leave behind a