Advanced Search Results

Madhukar Rajanna Darbhe Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 57, 213, 213(1) and 213(2); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 3, 118 and 119; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1962; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 331; Hindu Disposition of Property Act, 1916; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR339; 2008(2)BomCR418

challenged in these 2 Writ Petitions on the ground that provisions of Section 57(a) and (b) of Indian Succession Act, 1925, violate Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India with prayer to hold that Probate is required … portion be extended to Hindus and Mohammedans but then as sufficient information in this respect was not available, Section 331 was introduced as a temporary provision excluding them from operation of any part of the 1865 Succession Act.

Solomon and ors. Vs. Muthiah and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1974)1MLJ53

III of 1951), which came into force on 1st April, 1951. it was the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 that applied to the succession to the property of Swaminathan which opened on his death on 29th May, … rules herein contained shall constitute the law of British India applicable to all cases of intestate or testamentary succession.Section 331 of that Act so far as it is relevant provided:The provisions of this Act shall not apply to

Siddamurthy Jayarami Reddy (D) by Lrs. Vs. Godi Jaya Rami Reddy and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 141, 74 to 111; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Section 331; Hindu Wills Act, 1870; Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Bigamy Prevention Act of 1949

Sundaravaradan, learned senior counsel for the appellants argued: The importation of Section 57 and Section 141 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short, `the 1925 Act') is wholly inappropriate since the present case is concerned with the muffussil will … 1865 (for short, `the 1865 Act') was enacted to provide for intestate and testamentary succession in British India. Section 331 of the 1865 Act, however, excluded its applicability to intestate or testamentary succession to the property of any

Commissioner of Wealth-tax, West Bengal Iii Vs. Smt. Champa Kumari Sin ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1972SC2119; [1972]83ITR720(SC); (1972)1SCC508; [1972]3SCR118

Act of 1929 speaks of Jains as well as Hindus and Sections. 4 and 57 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 also did the same. The Court pointed out that Section 331 of the Indian Succession Act 1865 did

Trustees of h.c.dhanda Trust Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

submits that the Deed of Assent executed on 21.04.2005 is referable to Section 331 and 332 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Shri Chitale 7 submitted that document in question is not a Gift Deed. Shri Chitale submits that the

Ambabai Bhaichand Gujar Vs. Keshav Bandochand Gujar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR1941Bom233; (1941)43BOMLR114

Indian Succession Act of 1925 also do the same. At the same; time it must be noted that Section 331 of the Indian Succession Act of 1865, which is replaced by Section 4 of the Indian Succession Act … same year, namely, the Indian Succession (Amendment) Act (XVIII of 1929), by which Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act of 1925 was enlarged by the addition of the new clause making it applicable to all wills and

D. Chelliah Nadar and anr. Vs. G. Lalita Bai and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 254; State (Law) Act, 1951 - Sections 6; Christian Succession Act, 1092; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 6 and 29(2)

Reported in : AIR1978Mad66

whether the parties are governed by the Travancore Christian Succession Act, Regulation II of 1092, or the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The Indian Succession Act X of 1865 was enacted by the Governor General of India in Council and … contained therein constituted the law of British India applicable to all cases of intestate or testamentary succession. But Section 331 of the Act provided that the provisions of this Act shall not apply to intestate or testamentary succession

D. Chelliah Nadar and anr. Vs. G. Lalitha Bai and anr. Overruled

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : (1977)1MLJ454

whether the parties are governed by the Travancore Christian Succession Act Regulation II of 1092, or the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The Indian Succession Act X of 1865 was enacted by the Governor-General of India in Council and received … contained therein constituted the law of British India, applicable to all cases of Intestate or Testamentary Succession. But Section 331 of the Act provided that the provisions of this Act shall not apply to Intestate or Testamentary Succession

Pandraj Kunjilal Sadh (Deceased) and Rai Kumar Sadh Vs. Santosh Kumari ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

been taken away is the jurisdiction of this Court to try and entertain the proceeding under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and such jurisdiction has been conferred upon the City Civil Court at Calcutta. According to Mr. Deb, apart … 1865 (for short “the 1865 Act”) was enacted to provide for intestate and testamentary succession in British India. Section 331 of the 1865 Act, however, excluded its applicability to intestate or testamentary succession to the property of any

Shri Prem Prakash Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222, 228, 276, 276(1), 280, 281 and 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 467 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 340

Reported in : 118(2005)DLT681; 2005(81)DRJ157

that the verification of the petition by the attesting witness in compliance with Section 281 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 shows that Pehlad, one of the two attesting witnesses did not verify the petition but signed the same … suit aforesaid was sought to be brought on record in the present proceedings by and under I.A. No. 331/05. Certified copy of the deposition by Pehlad has been filed Along with the said application. Vide order dated