Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 330 · Page 1 of about 76 results (0.043 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 11 1999

Sudhir Asher and anr. Vs. Vijay Shroff and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-11-1999

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 152 and 330;; High Court Original Side Rules - Rule 1;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 482;; Administration of Estates Act, 1925

Reported in : (2000)1CALLT548(HC)

or revoked by any act of the-testator. In fact, the Chapter on ademptlon of legacies in the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is Chapter XVI which pertains only to ademptlon of specific legacies. Thus under section 152 of the Indian … as well as the specific legacy, that there will be a pro-rata abatement of all specific legacies (See section 330 of the Indian Succession Act). The ' disadvantage' of a specific legacy is that since it is Identified,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 1928

In Re: Manchersha Pestonji Danania

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-09-1928

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1928)30BOMLR1566; 113Ind.Cas.402

Chapter, that is to say, Chapter XXXI, or by the rules of procedure laid down in the Indian Succession Act, 1925, or by the Civil Procedure Code, the practice and procedure of the Probate Division of the High Court … matter. Costs of all parties to come out of the estate. Counsel certified. Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925), Section 330-Administrator-Renunciation-Retractation of renunciation.;Where an administrator has renounced his prior right to obtain letters of administration to the estate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 1986

Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Kanpur and ors. Vs. Chander Sen and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-16-1986

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Income Tax Act, 1961; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 6, 8 and 19; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 30; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 25A

Reported in : AIR1986SC1753; (1986)58CTR(SC)119; [1986]161ITR370(SC); 1986(2)SCALE55; (1986)3SCC567; [1986]3SCR254

family. But the High Court found that this principle has been modified by Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Section 8 of the said Act provides, inter alia, that the property of a male Hindu dying … capable of being so disposed of by him in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.15. It is clear that under the Hindu law, the moment a son is born, he gets a share

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 17 2006

G. Gopal and Etc. Vs. G. Nagarathinam and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-17-2006

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 71, 263 and 283

Reported in : AIR2007Mad28

ORDERR. Banumathi, J.1. The Applicant/Third Party has filed this Application to revoke the Grant or Probate dated 5 8 2002 of the Will dated 25-12-1984 in T.O.S. No. 32 of 1999.2. For better appreciation of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1985

Abdul Karim and anr. Vs. Raheesa Ansari

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-31-1985

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 373, 373(3), 384(1) and 388(2); Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 39

Reported in : AIR1986Ker183

disposal. 8. Learned counsel for the revision petitioners contended that the Appellate Court under Section 384 of the Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act') has no power to order remand that the Succession Court acting under Part IX … C112 taken outby the deceasedDirhams 54,000.00 Rs. 1,40,625.022. GratuityDirhams 5,602.96 Rs. 14,591.043. Proportionate leave encashment of 9 daysDirhams 330.00 Rs. 859.38 4. Deposit in Bank of Oman Dirhams 2,271.90Rs. 5,916.40 Total Dirhams 62,204.86 Rs. 1,61,991.83 Less Consular

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2017

M. Vijayalakshmi and Another Vs. Sadhu A.N. Sircar Foundation, Rep.by ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-02-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

8 of CPC read with Order 25 Rule 62 of Original Side Rules read with 263 of Indian Succession Act 1925 to revoke or recall and annul the grant of Letters of Administration granted to the 1st respondent in … the material facts and obtained Letters of Administration fraudulently. 21. In this context, it is useful to refer Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act 1925, which reads as follows: 263. Revocation or annulment for just cause

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 1987

Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation, Ahmedabad Vs. Ramanbhai Prab ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-11-1987

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A, 110A(1), 110B and 110F; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(11)

Reported in : AIR1987SC1690; [1987]62CompCas609(SC); (1987)2GLR1104; JT1987(2)SC384; 1987MhLJ838(SC); 1987(1)SCALE1027; (1987)3SCC234; [1987]3SCR404; MANU/SC/0469/1987

specified cases. Section 102 of the Act provides that notwithstanding anything contained in Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the death of a person in whose favour a certificate of insurance has been issued, if it occurs … some extent as coming within the principle of liability defined in Rylands v. Fletcher [1868] LR. 3 H.L. 330. From the point of view of the pedestrian the roads of this country have been rendered by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

PROBATE OF A WILL, OR LETTER OF ADMINISTRATION, OR COURT DECREE (AS MAY BE APPLICABLE), UNDER THE INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 (10 OF1925 (ATTACH A COPY) 5. THE LATEST AND COMPLETE COPY OF THE FINANCIAL CONTRACT REFLECTING ALL AMENDMENTS … proviso, the CIRP has to be mandatorily completed within a period of 330 days from the insolvency commencement date. This period of 330 days is … petitioners have approached this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. They call in 2 question Sections 3, 4 and 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act 2020 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2004

Smt. A. Lakshmi Vs. Arjun Associated Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Director a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-12-2004

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 92A, 92B, 95, 110, 110B, 147, 162, 163A, 166, 167, 168 and 168(1); Fatal accidents Act, 1855; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168(1); Life Insurance Act, 1956 - Sections 44F; Provident Fund Act, 1925

Reported in : I(2005)ACC289; 2005ACJ704; 2004(4)ALD618; 2004(5)ALT13

which such person knows, under the law has to go to his heirs after his death either by succession or under a will could be said to be the 'pecuniary gain' only on account of one's accidental … should be accepted.' 17. The next deduction noticed from the salary is General Provident Fund. The Provident Fund Act, 1925 is a Central Enactment and it extends to the whole of India. The object underlying the Provident Fund … of death. The constitution of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal itself under section 110 is as the section states: '... for the purpose of adjudicating

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1993

Bherulal Vs. Ramkunwarbai and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-12-1993

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63

Reported in : AIR1994MP5

satisfied not only on execution but also about its authenticity. As regards 'execution' Section 63 of The Indian Succession Act, 1925, illumines the path by codifying Rule (c) as under:--'63(c).-- The will shall be attested by two or more … on the nature of the evidence adduced by the party.'xxxxx 18. More recently, this Court in M.A. No. 330/89 Shri Vasudeo v. Smt. Suman decided on 5-7-93 held that-'The propounder is required to show by satisfactory evidence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial