Advanced Search Results

V.M. Mathew Vs. V.S. Sharma and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1996SC109; JT1995(6)SC318; 1996(1)KLT36(SC); (1996)1MLJ76(SC); 1995(5)SCALE111; (1995)6SCC122; [1995]Supp3SCR131; 1995(2)LC809(SC)

2 filed L.A.O.P. No. 143 of 1980 in the District Court, Ernakulam under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of letters of administration in respect of the estate of deceased Annamma and annexed the copy … sought to rely on the deposition of Kurian and he sought to bring on record that evidence under Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act (for short, The Act'), the reception of which was objected to by respondent

Mt. Ganga Devi Vs. Bijai Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Acts : Special Marriage Act, 1872 - Sections 22 and 24; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1952All244

costs. Family - succession - Sections 24 and 22 of Special Marriage Act, 1872 and Section 33 of Succession Act, 1925 - marriage under Special Marriage Act deemed to have separated from joint family - died and his wife

Mary Jecintha Vs. Joseph Mary and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure,(CPC) 1908 - Section 96; Court Fees Act - Section 37(2)(1); Indian Succession Act 1925 - Section 33

property. Such ascertainment of share is wrong in view of the provision in Section 33 of the Indian Succession Act 1925, which goes thus:"33. Where intestate has left widow and lineal descendants or widow and kindered only, or widow

J. Ramayyan Vs. J. Palayyan and 4 Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 -- Sections 33 and 33-A; Indian Succession Act, 1951; Travancore Christian Succession Regulation Act

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC455; (1998)IIIMLJ745

On the question of applicability of the Travancore Christian Succession Act after coming into force of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the lower Appellate Court had relied on the judgment of the Division Bench of this court reported in … the fourth defendant being the widow of Joseph Nadar. Her rights have to be determined in accordance with section 33 and 33-A of the Indian Succession Act, which has not been taken into account in view of the

Smt. Swaran Lata Vs. State and Sh. P.P. Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 281; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 61; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 22 and 33, Rule 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 13, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR2006Delhi21; 123(2005)DLT264; 2005(84)DRJ135

in as much as it was not in consonance with the provisions of Section 281 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and, thereforee, the same was liable to be rejected.2. That the Will was a fabricated document and was … evidence and would be of corroborative value. Dr. Sidhu learned counsel for the appellant drew our attention to Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and on the strength of the same contended that evidence of a

S. Palani and Others Vs. S. Bharathi Dasan (Deceased) and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2007 numbered on conversion of O.P.No.607 of 2007, filed under Sections 232 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Order 25 Rule 5 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, praying that Letters of Administration … (Prayers: T.O.S.No.22 of 2007 numbered on conversion of O.P.No.607 of 2007, filed under Sections 232 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Order 25 Rule 5 of the Madras High … Side Rules - Order 25 Rule 5; Comparative Citation: 2016 (1) MWN(Civil) 337,

Mrs. Elizabeth Connolly (Nee Faithful) Wife of Phelim Connolly Represe ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 24 to 28, 33, 118, 213, 227, 263, 301 and 302; Civil Procedure Coce - Order 27, Rule 2

for.In July 1990, one Rev. Benjamin Dorairaj tiled a petition under Section 301 and 302 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for brevity) to remove the Executrix on the ground that she was … his widow to an extent of half-share as well as on the petitioner and her sister as per Section 33 of the Act. Mrs.Faithful had a right over those properties only to an extent of hall-share and the

Kaliappan (Died) and Others Vs. A.K. Somasundaram (Died) and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

with 'Transfer for Benefit of Unborn Person' is almost similar to that of Section 113 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. It cannot be lost sight of that Section 13 of the Transfer of Property Act controls Section 113 … fide purchasers for value without notice who have improved the property and who are entitled to equity under Section 33 of the Specific Relief Act?" The Contentions, Discussions and Findings on Substantial Questions of Law No.1 to 4:

Jane Antony and ors. Vs. V.M. Siyath and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 8, 33, 36 and 37 to 40; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 19, 21 and 57; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 12 and 16; Domestic Violence Act, 2005; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 2(1) and 6; Property Law (Amendment) Act, 1971; Status of Children Act, 1969 - Sections 3; Matrimonial Causes Act; Family Law Reform Act, 1969; Family Law Reform (Amendment) Act, 1987; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 125 and 125(1); Hindu Law; Muslim Law; Constitution of India - Article 32; Central Civil Service (Conduct) Rules; Bihar Government Servants' Conduct Rules, 1976

Reported in : 2009ACJ2272

the entitlement of compensation for respondent Nos. 4 and 5 with reference to the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which is the law of succession applicable to the appellants. Counsel for the appellants relied on Section 33(a)

S.A. Quddus Vs. S. Veerappa and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33, 65 and 68; Karnataka Registration Rules, 1965 - Rules 81; Mysore Registration Rules, 1965 - Rule 81

Reported in : AIR1994Kant20

that Will has been duly proved. Its execution and attestation as required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 are proved. The contentions therefore raised with regard to the validity of the Will stand rejected. Validity of … Also the deposition of the scribe at Ex. P-10 does not fall under any of the clauses of Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act and as such, it is not admissible and is not available for being