Advanced Search Results

Virbhadrappa Shilvant Vs. Shekabai Harun Sayed Ahmed Arab

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1939Bom188; (1939)41BOMLR249

Section 32 of the Administrator-General's Act, 1913, or a succession certificate granted under Part X of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, or a certificate granted under the Succession Certificate Act of 1889, and having the debt specified therein. Unless … such as Bhagirthibai v. Roshanbi : Mirkha v. Bhagirithibai I.L.R. (1918) 43 Bom. 412 : 21 Bom L.R. 329; and Lala Miya v. Manubibi I.L.R. (1923) 47 Bom. 712 : 25 Bom. L.R. 408. That view has

Gotiram Nathu Mendre Vs. Sonabai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 91 - Schedule - Articles 44 and 91; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 59 - Schedule - Article 59; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 211, 307, 307(1) and 307(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 32, Rule 7(1) - Order 41, Rule 25; Bombay Rent Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1970Bom73; (1969)71BOMLR157; ILR1969Bom402

No. 1 contended that Sakhubai was constituted an 'executor within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which defines an executor as meaning a person to whom the execution of the last will of a … of the Privy Council in the case of Bijoy Gopal Mukerji v. Krishna Mahishi Debi ILR (1907) Cal. 329 . That was a case of reversioner filing a suit for possession without a prayer for setting aside

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. VipIn K. Nagori

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1988)24ITD51(Ahd.)

other testamentary disposition his interest in the Mitakashara coparcenary property in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, or any other law for the time being in force and applicable to Hindus. As we shall presently … did not accept the claim of the AP and thereby rejected its contention referred to above relying on Section 3(2) of the Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 and Hindu Succession Act, 1956 holding therein as

Pravina Vikrant Ghotge Vs. Vinayak Ramchandra Dindorikar and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

of 4 weeks from today. The interim order in the petition shall continue during the period of stay. Succession Act, 1925 - Section 211, 312 – Case Referred: ShaliniShyam Shetty and Another V/s. Rajendra Shankar Patil 2010 (8) SCC … Apex Court in Shalini Shyam Shetty and Another V/s. Rajendra Shankar Patil, reported in 2010 (8) SCC page 329. The Apex Court at paragraph-62 of the decision, formulates the principles on the exercise of High Court's jurisdiction

Emperor Vs. Yellappa Durgaji Jadhav

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1929)31BOMLR523

them to be illegal or untenable.;Saadat Mian v. King-Emperor (1926) I.L.R. 6 Pat. 329, dissented from. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

T.K.Natarajan vs T.K.Raman Achari

Court : Kerala

its issuance. The words “Administrator” and “Probate” aredefined under clause (a) and (f) of Section 2 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short, 'the Act') as follows: “(a) "administrator" means a person appointed by competent authority to administer the … COURT, ERNAKULAM APPELLANTS/ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS 2 TO 7:1 T.K.NATARAJAN, S/O LATE KRISHNAN KUTTY ACHARI, R/O. THARAMMAL HOUSE, ARUVAKKOTTE, NILAMBUR-679 329, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA STATE (DIED). 2 T.K. SANTHAKUMARI, W/O. LATE SUKUMARAN ACHARI, R/O. THARAMMAL HOUSE, ARUVAKKOTTE, NILAMBUR-679 329,

Manicklal Mukherjee (Kali Durga Estate), Calcutta Vs. Commissioner of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ContractCivil

Reported in : AIR1993SC1571; 1992(2)SCALE812; (1993)1SCC505; [1992]Supp1SCR967

the ambit of s. III of the Regulation. Since the courts have now ample powers under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the Code of Civil Procedure, these provisions of the Regulation are out of date and should be … of title the appellants also filed on 28th April, 1981 suit No. 329 of 1981 on the file of the High Court at Calcutta for … of the respondent on both the points and directed the District Judge to take security under s. IV. Section IV of the Regulation is as follows, "If there be more heirs than one to the estate of

Susila Ammal Vs. Indiraniammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 -- Sections 87, 88, 97, 113, 114 and 118; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 -- Sections 15

Reported in : 2000(4)CTC78

will were incongrous and offended the rule against perpetuity as set out in Section- 114 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.6. Per contra, Mrs.Prabha Sridevan submitted that the concept of rule against perpetuity could not be brought in or

Gurdial Singh (Dead) Through Lr versus Jagir Kaur (Dead) and Anr. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]8S.C.R.257

SCC 209 - referred to. Hames v. Hinkson, AIR 1946 PC 156 - referred to. List of Acts Succession Act, 1925; Evidence Act, 1872. [2025] 8 S.C.R. 259 Gurdial Singh (Dead) Through LR v. Jagir Kaur (Dead) and Anr. … Legal Principles 11. A Will has to be proved like any other document subject to the requirements of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, that is … taking steps to alienate the property, appellant filed a Suit RBT No. 329/1992 by propounding a Will executed by Maya Singh on 16.05.1991, bequeathing the

M/S. Sumac International Ltd. Vs. M/S. Pnb Capital Services Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : United Provinces High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948 - Schedule - Article 14; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10, 433, 434, 439, 446, 448, 542 and 543; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 21; Rules of the Court, 1952 - Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1997All424; [1998]93CompCas236(All)

Act, 1913(ActVII of 1913). 4. The Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 (Act XI of 1922). 5. The Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Act XXXIX of 1925). 6. The Indian Matrimonial Causes (War Marriages) Act, 1948 (Act No. XL of 1948).Provided … Hardware and Tools Ltd. v. Saru Smalling (P.) Ltd., AIR 1983 All 329 are based on Section 21, C.P.C. and cannot be helpful in the … are that respondent Punjab National Bank tiled a petition on 2-7-1996 for winding up of appellant Company under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The winding up of the Company has been sought