Advanced Search Results

Gita Alias Gita Ravi Vs. Mary Jenet James Alias M.J. James and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1995)1MLJ467

of the will had to be proved in accordance with the provisions of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The letters which had been written by Shri Mishra's clerk contained no mention whatsoever of any instructions having … whether the explanation is exhaustive or illustrative. In R. Thangarajan v. R. Balasubramanian and Ors. (1994) 2 L.W. 326 another Division Bench to which a member of the Bench which decided the above case was a party,

Thurukanni Pompiah and anr. Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(1)

Reported in : AIR1965SC939; 1965CriLJ31

in absence of further corroboration - Conviction and sentence of appellant set aside - Appeal allowed - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 276: [S.B. Sinha, Lokeshwar Singh Panta & B. Sudershan Reddy, JJ] Forgery of Will … the State was allowed in part, the conviction of Pompiah and Hussaini was altered into one under Section 326/34 of the Indian Penal Code, and in lieu of the sentence imposed by the Sessions Judge, they were

Maharajadhiraj Kameshwara Singh Bahadur of Darbhanga Vs. Pherozsha Mer ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 165Ind.Cas.121

executrix will retain their costs out of the estate as between attorney and client. Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925), Sections 211, 326 - Lease--Lessee's death--Executors, liability of--Executor entering into possession--Personal liability. - … after he has assigned his interest....9. Reliance is also placed on Sections 211 and 323 of the Indian Succession Act.10. For the second defendant Mr. Choudhury has contended that the first defendant, although he was an executor, became … incur after he has assigned his interest....9. Reliance is also placed on Sections 211 and 323 of the Indian Succession Act.10. For the second defendant

City of El Paso Vs. Simmons

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

remedy-obligation distinction. Rather, the Court upheld a moratory statute in post-depression times suspending for the tenth year in succession the mortgagee's right of foreclosure on the ground that contracts are not constitutionally immune from impairment by state … attempts to quiet titles through a repurchase act, the Land Commissioner in 1925 expressed the belief that the "owners can realize such returns from [the … necessary.'" East New York Savings Bank v. Hahn, 326 U. S. 230 , 326 U. S. 232 … the land was forfeited for nonpayment of interest. A notice of forfeiture and a copy of the 1941 Act allowing reinstatement within five years were sent to the last purchaser of record, but were returned unclaimed. Appellee … from the United States courts of appeals. [ Footnote 5 ] That section now provides that an appeal improvidently taken from a court of appeals,

H.V. Veerabhadraiah Vs. H.S. Kanteeravachar and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 214; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 and 146 - Order 21, Rule 35; Administrator General's Act, 1918 - Sections 31 and 32; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 214(1); Income Tax Rule, 1961 - Rule 26(1)

Reported in : AIR2001Kant171; 2001(4)KarLJ31

probate or succession certificate the proceeding could not be maintained in view of Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The learned Counsel for the revisionist, further made reference to decision of this Court in Smt. Kariyamma and … of the plaintiff the opposite party. The suit had been filed in the year 1972 in O.S. No- 326 of 1972 on the file of the Additional Munsiff, Madhugiri. The Trial Court decreed the suit and the

R. Chandran Vs. M.V. Marappan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 173 and 326; Madras Village Panchayat Act - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1973SC2362; (1973)2SCC166; [1974]1SCR46; 1973(5)LC659(SC)

the ambit of s. III of the Regulation. Since the courts have now ample powers under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the Code of Civil Procedure, these provisions of the Regulation are out of date and should be … president there is no Constitutional provision laying down any age limit. Article 326 of the Constitution, which lays down the principle of adult suffrage, lays … below 19. The High Court treated the matter as though it was dealing with a first appeal under Section 96 C.P.C. and not its powers under Article 227 of the Constitution. It did not deal with the

Maj. Gen Rajinder Singh Chowdhary Vs. S. Manjit Singh Chowdhary and or ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1157; AIR2001Delhi15; 88(2000)DLT173; 2000(55)DRJ518

pugantia reprinted in testamento ultimum ractum est'. This principle is also contained in Section 88 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 which together with its illustrations, provides as under:- 88. The last of two inconsistent clauses prevails._Where two clauses

Lalitha Christian Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

the subject land was Government land; (vi) that there was an amendment to Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and sub-Section (2) thereof categorically stated that sub-Section (1){which required a probate to be obtained in regard to

Othayoth Kunhikrishnan vs Othayoth Karunakaran

Court : Kerala

B1 Will. According to him, Ext. B1 Will is proved as required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and also Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, by examining DW1 who is one of the … the said Will was considered in that suit.6. The other suits namely O. S. Nos. 118, 119 and 326 of2013 were filed when the plaint schedule properties therein which is part of the Plaint schedule Item No.1

Othayoth Kunhikrishnan vs Mutteri Puthiya Veettil Satheesan

Court : Kerala

B1 Will. According to him, Ext. B1 Will is proved as required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and also Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, by examining DW1 who is one of the … the said Will was considered in that suit.6. The other suits namely O. S. Nos. 118, 119 and 326 of2013 were filed when the plaint schedule properties therein which is part of the Plaint schedule Item No.1