Advanced Search Results

In Re: Hasima Latifi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 212, 213, 213(1), 213(2), 370 and 370(1); Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 21; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 5(2) and 324(1)

Reported in : AIR1962Bom227; (1961)63BOMLR940

and that because of that reason succession to his property is regulated by the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. As regards the statement of fact contained in that paragraph there is obviously some mistake, because it has … country is the person entitle to succeed to the moveable property of the deceased determined. Sub-section (1) of Section 324 of the Succession Act, however, provides that if the domicile of the deceased was not in India, the

Emperor Vs. Manjubhai Gordhandas

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1929)31BOMLR536

opportunity arises for its use. The words do not necessarily connote a habitual course of conduct. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … a distinct offence from the previous one, and in our opinion, this previous trial for an offence under Section 324, Indian Penal Code, would not be a bar to the present proceedings. The ruling of our Court in

Hawva Nachiyar and Another Vs. Balkish Beevi Ammal and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

have no application. A will must be proved in terms of the provisions of Section 63(c) of the Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. In the event of the provisions thereof cannot be … 450 (vi) Om Prakash (Dead) th. His LRs Vs. Shanti Devi and Othersreported in 2015 (1) MWN (CiVil) 324 (vii) Thulasiammal and 7 others Vs. Kalyani and 5 othersreported in 2003 (1) CTC 609 (viii) Jagat Ram

Kumud Lall versus Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through Lrs and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 5 S.C.R. 301

to what extent.Headnotes†Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - ss.13(7), 2(b)(v) - Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - ss.38(12), 2(5)(vi) - Succession Act, 1925 - s.306 - Legal Representatives Suits Act, 1855 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Ord. 22, r.4 … of the National Consumers Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in MA No. 324 of 2011 and MA No. 1214 of 2009. With Civil Appeal No(s). … heirs. On notice, both wife and son filed applications4 under Order XXII5 Rule 16 and 47 read with Section 1518 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) and Section 229 of 1986 Act, praying to drop

Municipal Council, Raichur Vs. Amar Chand Prasanna Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Mysore Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 57, 95, 97(1), 97(2), 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 323, 324, 325(1), 325(2) and 325(3); Mysore Municipalities Taxation Rules, 1965 - Rules 25 to 32

Reported in : AIR1968SC255; [1968]1SCR87

the ambit of s. III of the Regulation. Since the courts have now ample powers under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the Code of Civil Procedure, these provisions of the Regulation are out of date and should be … a trader of public body allowed to have an account current to present a declaration in Form VII. Section 324 authorises the municipal council to make, alter or rescind bye-laws, subject to the provisions of the Act and

Pressy Pinto Vs. Rony Maxim Pinto and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 35A, 91, 92, 95, 295 and 299; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24; Karnataka Court-Fee and Suits Valuation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(2), 2(14), 96, 104 and 144 - Order 7, Rule 10 - Order 9, Rules 9 and 13 - Order 11, Rule 21 - Order 21, Rules 34, 72, 92 and 106(1) - Order 22, Rules 9 and 10 - Order 25, Rule 2 - Order 33, Rules 5 and 7 - Order 35, Rules 3, 4 and 6 - Order 37, Rules 2, 3 and 6 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A, 4 and 10 -Order 40, Rules 1 and 4 - Order 41, Rules 1, 2, 19, 21, 23 and 23A - Order 43, Rules 1 and 2 and Order 47, Rule 4

Reported in : AIR2009Kant157; 2009(5)KarLJ601; 2009(4)AIRKarR281

of the observation of learned single Judge on earlier occasion in RFA 324/02.3. Sections 295, 299 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and so also Sections 96, 104 and Order 43, Rules 1 and 2 of the C.P.C. are relevant … would be maintainable in view of the observation of learned single Judge on earlier occasion in RFA 324/02.3. Sections 295, 299 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and so also Sections 96, 104 and Order 43, Rules 1

N. Renuka Devi Vs. E. Lalitha and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

out of the above said decisions, it is necessary to take notice of the relevant provisions in the Succession Act, 1925. Section 266 of the Act provides that the District Judge shall have, in relation to the granting of Probate … This Court in Dalip Singh Vs. State of U.P. (2010 (2) SCC 114 : 2010 (1) SCC (Civ) 324) observed that: (SCC p.116, para 1) "1. Truth constituted an integral part of the justice delivery system which

Jogendranath Banerjee Vs. Makhan Lal Banerjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR1942Cal401

the defendant has to prove suoh person's right as legatee, he comes within the scope of Section 213, Succession Act, 1925 (Section 187 of the old Act 10 of 1865).19. In Ranjit Kumar v. Subodh Chandra : AIR1937Cal252 (D.N. Mitter … was made to the cases in Sarala Sundari Debi v. Hazari Dasi Debi ('16) 3 A.I.R. 1916 Cal. 324, Basunta Kumar v. Gopal Chunder ('15) 2 A.I.R. 1915 Cal. 207, Rani Prayag Kumari Debi v. Siva Prosad

Chittaranjan Narottamdas Negandhi Vs. Hemkala Alias Meenakshi Mansingh ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

evidence on record, it is necessary to note the provisions of Sections 59 and 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925: "59. Person capable of making Wills.- Every person of sound mind not being a minor may dispose of … two elements. Before I turn to the evidence on record, it is necessary to note the provisions of Sections 59 and 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925: "59. Person capable of making Wills.- Every person of … 323), and of her in Amreli playing garba, Exhibit "W" (Paperbook, p. 324). 42. Mr. Shah refers to a decision of the Himachal Pradesh High

Narain Malik vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 228 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeking letter of administration in respect of the properties of late Nalin Malik located within the territorial jurisdiction … has been filed with the petition. As per schedule there is a vacant plot of land admeasuring about 324 square meters being Plot No.29, Bhirochi Cooperative House Building Society Limited, Bhera Enclave, New Delhi - 110087. There