Advanced Search Results

Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Another Vs. Ashok Jagjivan Gokal and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

respondent Nos.1 and 2. Learned counsel placed reliance on Sections 192, 193, 301, 317 and 318 of Indian Succession Act 1925 in support of his submission that respondent Nos.1 and 2 who have acted contrary to the interest of … for stay is refused. Indian Succession Act 1925 - Section 192, Section 193, Section 301, Section 317 and Section 318 - Executer - Claiming right by succession to property - Petition seeking removal and discharge of respondent Nos.1

Nawab Mirza Mohammad Kazim Ali Khan and Nawab Fakhr Zahan Begam Vs. Na ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : (1938)40BOMLR843

a proper case by an application for the appointment of an administrator under Section 218 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.8. The question raised by the present case is whether the plaintiffs, as heirs having an interest in a … in case of the rest' (Deering v. The Earl of Winchelsea (1787) Bos. Pul. 270 : 1 Cox 318). ' The principle established in the case of Deering v. The Earl of Winchelsea (supra) is universal, that

Mary Assumption Trinidade Etc. Vs. Vincent Manuel Trinidade and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 5(2); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2 and 273; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(28)

Reported in : ILR1976Delhi95

effect of the aforesaid conclusion, it was held, negativing the contention of the respondents herein that the Indian Succession Act, 1925 did not then extend to Goa that on the annexation of Goa, the Succession Act was automatically extended … marked either to the elder son, who had been disinherited, or to his wife.(3) By a petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, the younger son, respondent No. 1, sought from the District JudgeLetters of … AIR1931Cal580 . In the matter of Sailendra Krishna Ray, Air 1949 Patna 318(3) ; ., Air 1936 Bombay 363(4) and in the matter of G.

Vinoo Bhagat Vs. Anita Rewal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 273

Reported in : 1980RLR245

She died on 29th August, 1977. Mrs. Anita Rewal made the petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter called 'the Act') for the grant of the probate with an affidavit of valuation of the property … been directed under Section 317 of the Act to file an inventory of all the assets and under Section 318 of the Act she has to state the value of such property in the inventory. Section 19E of

Ramchandra Ganpatrao Hande Alias Handege Vs.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

the Appellant that the decision in Rupali Mehta does not take into account the scheme of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The Learned Single Judge observed that the judgment does not prohibit any person from seeking protection of the … 261, 264, 266, 268, 269, 273, 276, 291, 295, 307, 308, 317, 318, 319, 332 and 368 (besides the Original Side Rules framed by this … to make an interim order in relation to the property. The Learned Single Judge held that (i) Under Section 217, which is in Part IX , the grant of probate or Letters of Administration as well as

K. Iyeswaran (since deceased) and Others Vs. G. Iyeswarialakshmi and A ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

is dismissed. However, considering the relationship between the parties, there shall be no order as to costs. Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 232, Section 276 Indian Contract Act, 1872 Section 12 Grant of Letters of Administration Petitioner sought for grant … counsel for the plaintiffs has placed reliance on the judgment of this Court reported in 2007 (5) CTC 318 (J.MATHEW V. LEELA JOSEPH) as well as the judgments of the Hon`ble Apex Court reported in (1995) 4

Shri Prem Prakash Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222, 228, 276, 276(1), 280, 281 and 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 467 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 340

Reported in : 118(2005)DLT681; 2005(81)DRJ157

that the verification of the petition by the attesting witness in compliance with Section 281 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 shows that Pehlad, one of the two attesting witnesses did not verify the petition but signed the same … of properties vis-a-vis the Will.58. One of the properties referred to in the Will is House No. XVII 318-322, Joshi Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. Schedule of properties filed with the petition describes the property as XVII/318-323,

N.P. Saseendran versus N.P. Ponnamma & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 3 S.C.R. 957

1959 - Art.31 - Registration Act, 1909 - s.17 - Specific Relief Act, 1963 - s.2(b) - Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Part VI - ss.2(h), 59, 61, 62, 63, 70, 89 - Respondent No.1 was the plaintiff (daughter) … v. State of Bihar [2024] 1 SCR 1165 : (2024) 4 SCC 318 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 87 at page 327; Naramadaben Maganlal Thakker … registration of the same, would amount to acceptance of the gift and the transaction satisfies the requirement of Section 122 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Once the document is categorized as a gift, in

K.Vasantharajan vs Vijayalakshmi Krishnaswamy

Court : Chennai

the genuineness of Ex-B.30- Poomathal's alleged Will. Further, Ex-B.30 was not proved as per Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. One of the attestor is the plaintiff's father … Court Coimbatore. Page No.53 of 57N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.ANDR.SAKTHIVEL, J.TK PRE-DELIVERY COMMON JUDGMENT MADE IN A.S.Nos.623 of 2018 and 318 of 2019N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.andR.SAKTHIVEL, J.These cases have been listed under the caption, for being mentioned. Page No.54 of

Adi Dara Patel and Others Vs. S. R. Jondhale and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Minocher so also Sorabji and a daughter Nagi. 111. Mr. Chidambaram's arguments overlook the scheme of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and its specific provisions relating to the role and power of executors. That Act consolidates the law applicable … State of Bombay vs. Morarji Cooverji (1958) Vol. LXI B. C. R. 318. (xii) M. P. Mittal vs. State of Haryana and Ors. (1984) 4 … calling for the records, papers and proceedings pertaining to :- (i) The order dated 30th November, 2006 under section 8(4) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short the ULC Act ). (ii) The