Advanced Search Results

Madansa Annasa JaIn Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 30, 31, 36, 48 and 49; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Railways Act - Sections 55, 56, 72 and 77

Reported in : AIR1971Bom34; (1972)74BOMLR568; 1971MhLJ338

Mad. 133 and Secy, of State v. Simla Footwear Co. [1935] A.I.R. All. 601, referred to. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … Full Bench case - Jaldu Venkatasubba Rao v. Asiatic Steam Navigation Co., Calcutta, cited in AIR 1916 Mad 314. The case according to him could not fall within the purview of Article 48. 10. Now Article 31

Kumud Lall versus Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through Lrs and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 5 S.C.R. 301

to what extent.Headnotes†Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - ss.13(7), 2(b)(v) - Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - ss.38(12), 2(5)(vi) - Succession Act, 1925 - s.306 - Legal Representatives Suits Act, 1855 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Ord. 22, r.4 … maintainable against the estate of the deceased doctor. Loss to estate constitutes 314 [2026] 5 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reportsa distinct and independent head of claim, … heirs. On notice, both wife and son filed applications4 under Order XXII5 Rule 16 and 47 read with Section 1518 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) and Section 229 of 1986 Act, praying to drop

Jagdish Prasad (Since Deceased) Through Lrs. Vs.government of Nct of D ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Procedure, 1908 (CPC) read with Section 299 of the FAO No.289/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 11 Indian Succession Act, 1925 impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 9.11.2009 by which the trial court has dismissed the petition

Anjan Chakraborty Vs. The State of West Bengal and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

which is capable of being so disposed of by him in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 2(h) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 defines a Will to mean the legal declaration of the intention … B.M.Bhattacharjee & Anr.v.Russel Estate Corporation & Anr.).He has also referred to 2005 Volume 11 Supreme Court Cases page 314 (Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad & Ors.v.Shantadevi P. Gaekwad & Ors.) for the meaning of the word ‘allotment’ and the

Sudesh @ Alka vs.the State & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is filed against the judgment of the probate court dated 02.05.2007 by which the probate court below has

Ms. Sumitra Devi and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2 and 63; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 50; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68

Reported in : 2007(98)DRJ617

it would be pertinent to note the relevant statutory provisions in this regard.3. Section 2(h) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (the Act) gives the definition of a 'Will'. It reads as under:2(h) 'Will' means the legal declaration of … counsel for the Petitioner has sought to distinguish S.S. Srivastava v. State and Ors. 2007 IV AD (Del) 314, wherein this Court has observed as under:16. A 'Will', in order to be validly executed, is required to

Laxmi and ors. Vs. Parameshwari Hengsu and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3(1), 4(1), 7(2), 8 and 30(1); Madras Aliyasanthana Act, 1949 - Sections 35, 35(2), 36, 36(3), 36(4), 36(5), 36(6) and 37; Indian Succession Act, 1925; Constitution of India - Article 254

Reported in : AIR1969Kant175; AIR1969Mys175; ILR1968KAR931; (1968)2MysLJ454

which is capable of being so disposed of by him, in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (39 of 1925) or any other law for the time being in force and applicable to Hindus. Explanation … question of law as to whether and if so, in what manner, the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 7(2) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, (Central Act 30 of 1956) operate on the death of a … suit was that a certain award decree made in Original Suit No. 314 of 1924 on the file of the District Munsiff, Mangalore, amounted to

Smt. Urmila Agarwala Vs. Lav Kumar Agarwal and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222 and 276

Reported in : [2004(4)JCR433(Jhr)]

it appears that appellant-plaintiff is not the executor of the Will and under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 under which this petition was filed before the learned Court below for grant of probate of the Will, … property left behind by Late Lachhman Prasad Agarwal and the Suit has been registered as Partition Suit No. 314 of 1991 in the Court of Sub-ordinate Judge, Patna and the learned Sub ordinate Judge, Patna has issued

Sh. Asha Sehgal and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act 1925 - Sections 276; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rule 4

Reported in : 2008(102)DRJ172

are wife and children of Mr. Surender Kumar Sehgal filed a petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 seeking probate of the will in question purported to have been executed by the testator in their favor. … learned Trial Judge.46. Impugned order dated 2.12.1998 is affirmed. 47. The appeal is dismissed.48. No costs. C.M. No. 314/011. Above-captioned application under Order I Rule 10 CPC has been filed by one Mr.Rajinder Kumar Sehgal seeking his

Nawab Mirza Mohammad Kazim Ali Khan and Nawab Fakhr Zahan Begam Vs. Na ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : (1938)40BOMLR843

a proper case by an application for the appointment of an administrator under Section 218 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.8. The question raised by the present case is whether the plaintiffs, as heirs having an interest in a