Advanced Search Results

Doraibabu and ors. Vs. K. Masilamani and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : (1991)2MLJ359

terms of the grant applicable thereto descends to a.single heir or to any property to which the Indian Succession Act, 1925 applies.Since under this provisions Mylai Ammal became a heir in her own fight to succeed to the share … 1956, a fact that is not disputed before us. But it is stated that the incidence recognised under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act shall not apply to the properties in question for the reason that … Mishra, J.1. These appeals against the decrees in C.S. No. 313 of 1976 and C.S. No. 22 of 1977 arise out of a

Basavaraja and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : II(2008)DMC764SC; 2008(6)KarLJ577; RLW2009(1)SC307; 2008(12)SCALE735; 2008(3)ShimLC267

- Held, accused did not cause death by burning - Conviction set aside - Appeal allowed - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 [C.A. No. 35/1925]. Section 263; [S.B.Sinha & H.S.Bedi, JJ] Revocation of Probate In the application for grant of … 7 indicated that the death was due to asphyxia as a result of smothering. In the examination under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the `Code') question nos. 61 and 62 relate to

Shakti Yezdani and Others Vs. Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

the law of inheritance? (iii) Whether a bequest made in a Will executed in accordance with the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in respect of shares or securities of the deceased supersedes the nomination made under the provisions of Sections … Kokate's case, in paragraphs 24 and 25, it was held thus: 24. In the light of these judgments section 109A of the Companies Act is required to be interpreted with regard to the vesting of the shares

G.P. Sharma Vs. Hari Shankar Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

making the will, by operation of law, the will stands revoked. (see Sections 69 and 70 of Indian Succession Act, 1925). Registration of a will does not make it any more effective.16. We therefore reiterate that immovable property can … various components are placed with reference to each other. In this way the word "lay-out" is defined under Section 313 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. That provision reads as under :“313(1) Before utilising, selling or otherwise

Tara Chand Sharma and anr., Vs. Uma Aggarwal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR2010P& H30

of Shri Thakur. However, application was filed by sister of the deceased under Section 301 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for removal of the Executor. The said application, after trial, has been granted with other consequential orders, which … of this Court in SB Ranjit Singh and Anr. v. S. Santokh Singh Rais and Ors. 1950 PLR 313 was distinguished.(iii) Conduct of the Executor was malafide. As against the stand of the testator in the Will

Kumud Lall versus Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through Lrs and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 5 S.C.R. 301

to what extent.Headnotes†Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - ss.13(7), 2(b)(v) - Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - ss.38(12), 2(5)(vi) - Succession Act, 1925 - s.306 - Legal Representatives Suits Act, 1855 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Ord. 22, r.4 … also by the Haryana Law Commission in its 8th Report.[2026] 5 S.C.R. 313 Kumud Lall v. Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through Lrs and Othersb. Comparative … heirs. On notice, both wife and son filed applications4 under Order XXII5 Rule 16 and 47 read with Section 1518 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) and Section 229 of 1986 Act, praying to drop

Shakti Yezdani Vs. Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the rigour applicable to a will for its making or the test of its validity under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. According to the ruling, S. 109A & S. 109B of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Bye-law 9.11 … It was also the appellants’ contention that nominations made under/in Jayant Shivram Salgaonkar’s MFs/shares were made as per Section 109A & 109B of Companies Act, 1956 and bye-law 9.11.7 of the Depositories Act, 1996. Section 109A and

A.Gomathi Vs. A.Sangeetha

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

No.1 of 2014 A.Gomathi ... Appellant Vs. A.Sangeetha ... Respondent Appeal filed under Order 384(1) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, against the order dated 28.08.2014, passed in S.O.P.No.1 of 2011, on the file of I Additional District Court … The learned counsel for the appellant further contended that Ex.P4 Will is a registered Will and as per Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, it is not necessary to give positive evidence, to prove that the Testator

Ramniklal Amritlal Shah Vs. Bhupendra Impex Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 21(1), 111 to 114, 212 and 213; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 4 and 44; Partition Act, 1893 - Sections 4(1); Straits Settlements Limitation Ordinance Act, 1896 - Sections 17

Reported in : AIR2001Bom224; 2001(2)ALLMR592; 2001(2)BomCR479; (2001)1BOMLR670; 2001(2)MhLj536

was quick to point out that these Judgments were rendered prior to coming into force of the Indian Succession Act. 1925. and that the language used in sections 111 to 114 of the 1925 Act made a qualitative difference … deceased plaintiff. He has also filed a petition, being Probate Petition No. 313 of 1998, in this Court for grant of probate of the Will … Madhuben @ Mridulaben Amritlal Shah who had filed the suit before this Court. The suit was filed invoking Section 44 of the Transfer of Property Act and Section 4 of the Partition Act, 1893. The case was

Saradindu Banerjee Vs. Sita Banerjee @ Rekha Banerjee

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 264 and 276; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 6(1), 8 and 8(2); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 34 and 42; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : [2006(3)JCR244(Jhr)]

whereas the respondent is the petitioner. The said respondent filed an application under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, [hereinafter referred to as the said Act'], before the learned District Judge, Durnka for grant of probate of … Allahabad High Court in I.T.I. Ltd., Allahabad v. District Judge, Allahabad and Ors. reported in AIR 1998 All 313.5. Mr. A.K. Sahani, learned Counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, submitted that the Additional District Judge