Advanced Search Results
Crystal Developers Vs. Smt. Asha Lata Ghosh (Dead) Through Lrs. and or ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-05-2004
PropertyFamily
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 59, 61, 63, 211, 211(1), 212, 213, 213(1), 214, 216, 218, 218(1), 218(2), 219, 220, 221, 222, 227 235, 263, 273, 278, 297, 307, 317 and 332; ;Transfer of Property Act - Sections 41; ;Evidence Act - Sections 41 and 68; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23, Rule 3B; Indian Succession Act, 1865 - Sections 234; Constitution of India - Article 136
AIR2004SC4980; 2005(1)ALD1(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)64; (2005)1CALLT45(SC); 2004(5)CTC121; JT2004(9)SC64; (2004)4MLJ172(SC); 2004(8)SCALE390; (2005)9SCC375
adopted the arguments advanced on behalf of defendant No. 14 and submitted that under section 211 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, the estate of the deceased testator vests in the executor from the date the will becomes enforceable, i.e. … Balai Chand on 25.12.1977. He relied on the probate dated 31.7.1981; consent decree dated 3.8.1981 in suit No. 310 of 1981 as also the conveyance (Ex.A/8) dated 4.8.1981 in favour of Crystal Developers, defendant No. 14. In
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu Lal Grand Sons Family Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Aug-17-1989
Direct Taxation
(1989)31ITD52(Delhi)
and therefore, in view of Section 14 of the Transfer, of Property Act, 1908 and Section 114 of Succession Act, 1925, the tying-up of property beyond the minority of the persons to whom the Trust created belonged, was against … decision of the Supreme Court in the case of N.V. Shanmugham & Co. v. CIT [1971] 81 ITR 310 to press the point as to when assessment could be framed in the status of AOP. He submitted
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFerani Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Nusli Neville Wadia
Mumbai
Dec-15-2010
Contract
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 241, 301, 118, 310; Indian Contract Act - Section 56; Indian Trust Act - Section 53; Probate and Administration Act - Section 91
Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction of this Court. The said application was made under Section 241 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (the IS Act) for grant of Letters of Administration for the use and benefit of Bachoobai limited until … the Petitioner would not be entitled to the cover of the Court.114. Dr.Singhvi has drawn my attention to Section 310 of the Indian Succession Act which runs thus:310. Purchase by executor or administrator of deceased s property.-If any
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
J.B. Advani and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and Excess Pro ...
Mumbai
Mar-17-1950
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2)
AIR1950Bom297; (1950)52BOMLR434; [1950]18ITR557(Bom)
I to the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940.;Tennant v. Smith (1892) 3 T.C. 158, referred to. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … The English case on which the attorney-General relied is Spofforth and Prince v. Golder [1945] 26 T C 310. There one Spofforth, who was a chartered accountant, was charged with having supplied a scheme to one white
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarsh Vardhan Lodha and Others Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and Others
Kolkata
Aug-23-2012
Right to Information
AIR 1933 Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun and ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas and ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held that - the position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of … facts of the case properly and has not exercised its discretion properly in appointing the Administrator Pendente Lite. 310. Hence, we pass an order of injunction restraining the appellant not to deal with and not to transfer
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarsh Vardhan Lodha and ors. Vs. Devendra Kumar Mantri and anr.
Kolkata
Aug-23-2012
Education
h) AIR 193.Bom 342, Pandurang Shamrao Laun & ors. vs. Dwarkadas Kalliandas & ors.; APL and Receiver under Succession Act, 1925, Section 247 It was held thatthe position of an administrator pendente lite is similar to that of a receiver, … Dasi vs. Naba Gopal Chabi (1907) ILR 3.Cal. 305]. According to Kerr on Receivers (13th Edn.) at page 310 : The power of the company and its directors to deal with the property comprised in the appointment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.S. Chetan (Since Deceased by His Lrs. Leelavathi @ Leelamma W/O. K. ...
Karnataka
Apr-12-2006
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149, 149(2), 155, 166, 170 and 173; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A and 110C(2A); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306; Constitution of India - Article 38
2008ACJ191; 2007(6)KarLJ381; 2007(4)AIRKarR192; AIR2007NOC1642(DB).
reported In : ILR2002KAR1864 . Our attention was drawn to the provisions of Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Central Act No. 39 of 1925), Placing reliance on both these decisions, the learned Counsel assertively canvassed that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLeelavathi @ Leelamma and anr. Vs. Chandra Mouli and anr.
Karnataka
Apr-12-2006
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149(2), 155, 166, 170 and 173; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A and 110C(2A); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306; Constitution of India - Article 38; Indian Penal Code
ILR2007KAR2338; ILR2007(2)Kar2338; 2007(4)KCCRSN217(DB)
and Anr : ILR2002KAR1864 . Our attention was drawn to the provisions of Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (Central Act No. 39 of 1925). Placing reliance on both these decisions, the learned Counsel assertively canvassed that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Mh Rajbarbhuiya Vs. Mr. Am Mazumdar.
Guwahati
Sep-24-2010
divorce
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 384
1. Challenge in this appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is made against the judgment and order dated 4. 3. 2002 passed by the learned District Judge, Hailakandi, … the rules under the relevant law. Mulla on principles of Mahomedan Law (19th Edn, 1990) states vide para 310:,310. Talak may be oral or in writing A Talak may be effected (1) Orally (by spoken words) or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMussit. Rebun Nessa (2nd Wife), W/O Late Intaj Ali Laskar, Vs. Mussit. ...
Guwahati
Sep-24-2010
Right to Information
1. Challenge in this appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is made against the judgment and order dated 4.3.2002 passed by the learned District Judge, Hailakandi, in Misc.(Succession) … the rules under the relevant law. Mulla on principles of Mahomedan Law (19th Edn, 1990) states vide para 310:,310. Talak may be oral or in writing A Talak may be effected (1) Orally (by spoken words) or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »